Skip to main content
Log in

Amplitude-time characteristics of the long-latency components (N1, N2, and P300) of acoustic evoked potential in healthy subjects

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to trace the cumulative changes in the amplitude-time parameters of the AEP (acoustic evoked potential) components N1, N2, and P300 in the experimental situations of different complexities (counting and listening to sounds) and to compare the differences between young and mature subjects. The AEP was recorded in 12 healthy subjects aged 18 to 22 years and in 12 subjects aged 32 to 59 years. It was revealed that the components N1, N2, and P300 recorded in the situation of listening without any preliminary instruction did not differ in young and mature individuals. In the younger subjects, a higher N1 amplitude was revealed when they counted sounds, compared to listening, whereas the latency values of this component did not differ, irrespective of the complexity of the task. The component N2 was shown to demonstrate latency stability in relation to the age and the experimental situation. The N2 amplitude was higher in the situation of counting sounds in both age groups. The amplitude-time parameters of P300 did not differ in subjects of different ages in the listening task. The features of the components N1, N2, and P300 revealed in young and mature subjects in the experimental situations differing in complexity lead us to suggest that, with age, humans develop adaptive mechanisms contributing to successful task performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norman, D.A. and Shallice, T., Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior, in Consciousness and Self-Regulation, Davidson, R.J., Schwartz, G.E., and Shapiro, D., Eds., New York: Plenum, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luu, P. and Tucker, D.M., Self-Regulation and the Executive Functions: Electrophysiological Clues, in The Cognitive Electrophysiology of Mind and Brain, Zani, A. and Preverbio, A.M., Eds., San Diego: Academic, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gnezditskii, V.V., Vyzvannye potentsialy mozga v klinicheskoi praktike (Evoked Brain Potentials in Clinical Practice), Taganrog: Taganrog Gos. Univ., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ivanitskii, A.M., Il’yuchenok, I.R., and Ivanitskii, G.A., Selective Attention and Memory—Evoked Potentials in the Competition of Visual and Verbal Signals, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyatel., 2003, vol. 53, no. 5, p. 541.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kostandov, E.A., Psikhofiziologiya soznaniya i bessoznatel’nogo (Psychology of Consciousness and the Unconscious), St. Petersburg: Piter, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naatanen, R., Vnimanie i funktsii mozga (Attention and Brain Functions), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alho, K., Medvedev, S.V., Pakhomov, S.V., et al., Selective Tuning of the Left and Right Auditory Cortices during Spatially Directed Attention, Cogn. Brain Res., 1999, vol. 17, p. 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deouell, L.Y. and Knight, R.T., ERP Measures of Multiple Attention Deficits following Prefrontal Damage, in Neurobiology of Attention, Handbook of Neuropsychology, Los Angeles: Elsevier, 2005, chapter 56, p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, H.M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W.T., and Deldin, P., P300 as an Index of Attention to Self-Relevant Stimuli, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 2004, vol. 40, p. 216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Margun, G.R. and Hillyard, S.A., Spatial Gradients of Visual Attention: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1988, vol. 70, no. 5, p. 417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muller-Gass, A. and Campbell, K., Event-Related Potential Measures of the Inhibition of Information Processing: I. Selective Attention in the Waking State, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2002, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oknina, L.B., Nechaeva, N.L., Kutakova, E.V., et al., The Acoustic Evoked Potential P300 and Human Regulatory Functions, Mater. konf. po kognitivnoi nauke (Proc. Conf. on Cognitive Science), St. Petersburg, 2006, vol. 2, p. 386.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petel, S.H. and Azzam, P.N., Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected Studies of the Event-Related Potentials, Int. J. Med. Sci., 2005, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Danilova, N.N., Psikhofiziologiya (Psychophysiology), Moscow: Aspekt-Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dubrovinskaya, N.V., Machinskaya, R.I., and Kulakovskii, Yu.V., Dynamic Characteristic and Age-Related Determination of Functional Organization of the Brain in Attention, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyatel., 1997, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fjell, A.M. and Walhold, K.B., P3a and Neuropsychological “Frontal” Tests in Aging, Aging, Neuropsychol., Cognition, 2003, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walhold, K.B. and Fjell, A.M., Two- and Three-Stimuli Auditory Oddball ERP Tasks on Neuropsychological Measure in Aging, NeuroReport, 2001, vol. 12, no. 14, p. 3149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oknina, L.B., Tolochko, Yu.S., Sharova, E.V., et al., Specific Features of Spatial Organization of the AEP P300 in Active and Passive Stimulus Perception in Healthy Subjects, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyatel., 2001, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Delorme, A. and Makeig, S., EEGLAB: An Open Source Toolbox for Analysis of Single-Trial EEG Dynamics Including Independent Component Analysis, J. Neurosci. Methods, 2004, no. 134, p. 9.

  20. Polich, J., Clinical Application of the P300 Event-Related Brain Potentials, Phys. Med. Rehab. Clin. N. Am., 2004, vol. 15, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ceponiene, R., Westerfield, M., Torki, M., and Townsend, J., Modality-Specificity of Sensory Aging in Vision and Audition: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials, Brain Res., 2008, vol. 1215, p. 53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sysoeva, O.V., Ilyuchenok, I.R., and Ivanitsky, A.M., Rapid and Slow Brain Systems of Abstract and Concrete Worlds, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2007, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zanto, T.P. and Gazzaley, A., Neural Suppression of Irrelevant Information Underlies Optimal Working Memory Performance, J. Neurosci., 2009, vol. 29, no. 10, p. 3059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schiff, S., Valenti, P., Andrea, P., et al., The Effect of Aging on Auditory Components of Event-Related Brain Potentials, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2008, vol. 119, no. 8, p. 1795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © L.B. Oknina, O.A. Kuznetsova, A.P. Belostotskyi, N.L. Nechaeva, E.V. Kutakova, E.L. Masherow, A.S. Romanov, 2011, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2011, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 56–64.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oknina, L.B., Kuznetsova, O.A., Belostotskyi, A.P. et al. Amplitude-time characteristics of the long-latency components (N1, N2, and P300) of acoustic evoked potential in healthy subjects. Hum Physiol 37, 49–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119710061052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119710061052

Keywords

Navigation