Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of biological and social factors for academic performance

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three groups of children with LDs (LDs; a total of 62 children) are considered in this study with respect to their specific cognitive and psychological features. In the first group of children, these difficulties are symptoms of the FMR1 gene dysfunction. The poor academic performance of children from the second group is associated with social interaction problems at a high intelligence level. The low academic performance of children from the third group results from unevenly developed verbal and nonverbal abilities. The importance of integrated neurophysiologic, neuropsychological, and clinical psychological examination for identifying the causes of difficulties at school has been demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sabaratnam, M., Fragile X Syndrome, Psychiatry, 2006, vol. 5, p. 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Irwin, S.A., et al., Abnormal Dendritic and Dendritic Spine Characteristics in Fragile-X Patients and the Mouse Model of Fragile-X Syndrome, Cerebral Cortex, 2000, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 1038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cornish, K.M., Li, L., Kogan, C.S., et al., Age-Dependent Cognitive Changes in Carriers of the Fragile X Syndrome, Cortex, 2008, vol. 44, no. 6, p. 628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufmann, W.E., Cortell, R., Kau, A.S., et al., Autism Spectrum Disorder in Fragile X Syndrome: Communication, Social Interaction, and Specific Behaviors, Am. J. Med. Genetics, 2004, vol. 129A, no. 3, p. 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornish, K., Turk, J., and Hagerman, R., The Fragile X Continuum: New Advances and Perspectives, J. Intell. Disab. Res., 2008, vol. 52, no. 6, p. 469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagerman, R.G. and Cronister, A., Fragile X Syndrome. Diagnosis, Treatment and Research, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peng, J. and Stephen, T., Understanding the Molecular Basis of Fragile X Syndrome, Hum. Mol. Gen., 2000, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hagerman, R. and Coffey, S., Neuropathy as a Presenting Feature in Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome, Am. J. Med. Gen., p. 2256.

  9. Berry-Kravis, E.M. and Hessl, D., A Pilot OpenLabel Single-Dose Trial of Fenobam in Adults with Fragile X Syndrome, J. Med. Genet. Online, 6 Jan 2009, p. 6, http://jmg.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/jmg.2008.063701v1.

  10. Goetz, C.G., Leehey, M.A., Hagerman, R.J., et al., Neuropathic Features in Fragile X Premutation Carriers, Am. J. Med. Genet. A, 2007, vol. 143, no. 1, p. 19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faraz Farzin, B.S., Perry, H., Hessl, D., et al., Autism Spectrum Disorders and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Boys with the Fragile X Premutation, JDBP, 2006, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grigsby, J., Brega, A.G., Leehey, M.A., et al., Impairment of Executive Cognitive Functioning in Males with Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome, Mov. Disord., 2007, vol. 22, no. 5, p. 645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Terrasier, J.-Ch., Gifted Children: Research and Education in France, in Education of the Gifted in Europe: Theoretical and Research Issues, Monks, F.J. and Boxtel, H.W., Eds., Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1992, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery, D., Non-Verbal Learning Difficulties, in Gifted and Talented Children with Special Education Needs. Double Exceptionality, London: David Fulton, 2003, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gyarmathy, E., Holistic Learners: Identifying Gifted Children with Learning Disabilities: An Experimental Perspective, in Able Underachievers, Montgomery, D., Ed., London, Philadelphia: Whurr, 2004, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Voinova, V.Yu., Novikov, P.G., Vorsanova, S.G., et al., Novaya sistema dlya otsenki tyazhesti klinicheskikh priznakov u detey s sindromom umstvennoy otstalosti, stseplennoy s lomkoy khromosomot X (The New System for Estimating the Severity of Clinical Signs in Children with Mental retardation Syndrome Coupled with Fragile X Syndrome), Moscow, 2006.

  17. Kaufman, A.S. and Kaufman, N.L., Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Circle Pines: AGS, 2004, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lovi, O.V. and Belopol’sky, V.I., Zritel’no-motorny geshtal’t-test Bender: Rukovodstvo (Bender Visuomotor Gestalt Test: A Manual), Moscow, 2003.

  19. Simernitskaya, E.G., Neiropsikhologicheskaya metodika ekspress diagnostiki “Luriya-90” (Luria-90 Neuropsychological Quick Diagnostic Technique), Moscow: Obshchestvo “Znanie,” 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shumakova, N.B., Obuchenie i razvitie odarennykh detei (Education and Development of Gifted Children), Moscow: MPSI, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shcheblanova, E.I., Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika odarennosti shkol’nikov: problemy, metody, rezul’taty issledovanii i praktiki (Psychological Diagnostics of Schoolchildren’s Giftedness: Problems, Methods, Research Results, and Practices), Moscow: MPSI, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Averina, I.S. and Shcheblanova, E.I., Verbal’nyi test tvorcheskogo myshleniya “Neobychnoe ispol’zovanie” (Verbal Test of Creative Thinking “Uncommon Usage”), Moscow: Sobor”, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kratkii test tvorcheskogo myshleniya: Figurnaya forma / Posobie dlya shkol’nykh psikhologov (Brief Test of Creative Thinking: Figured Shape: A Guide for School Psychologists), Shcheblanova, E.I., Ed., Moscow: Intor, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prikhozhan, A.M., Trevozhnost’ u detei i podrostkov: psikhologicheskaya priroda i vozrastnaya dinamika (Anxiety in Children and Adolescents: Psychological Nature and Age-Specific Dynamics), Moscow: MPSI, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Praktikum po vozrastnoi psikhologii (Practical Course in Developmental Psychology), Golovey, L.A. and Rybalko, E.F., Eds., St. Petersburg: Rech’, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gorbachevskaya, N.L., Zavadenko, N.N., Yakupova, L.P., et al., Electroencephalographic Study of Children’s Hyperactivity, Fiziol. Chel., 1996, vol. 22, no. 5, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chuprikova, N.I., Psikhologiya umstvennogo razvitiya: printsip differentsiatsii (Psychology of Mental Development: The Principle of Differentiation), Moscow: Stoletiye, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Adrianov, O.S., Brain Architecture and Personal Individuality), Usp. Fiziol. Nauk, 1993, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Panyushkina, S.V., Kurova, N.S., Kogan, B.M, and Darovskaya, N.D., Cholinolytic and Cholinomimetic Effects on Certain Neuro-, Psychophysiological and Biochemical Indices, Ross. Psikhiatr. Zh., 1998, no. 3, p. 42.

  30. Davydova, E.Yu., Neyrobiologicheskiye korrelyaty uspeshnosti obucheniya (Neurobiological Correlates of Learning Success), Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2002.

  31. Craggs, J.G., Sanchez, J., Kibby, M.Y., et al., Brain Morphology and Neuropsychological Profiles in a Family Displaying Dyslexia and Superior Nonverbal Intelligence, Cortex, 2006, vol. 42.

  32. Iznak, A.F., Zhigul’skaya, S.E., Gorbachevskaya, N.L., et al., EEG Correlates of “Mild” Impairments of Higher Cortical Functions, Fiziol. Chel., 2001, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Davydova, E.Yu., Gorbachevskaya, N.L., Yakupova, L.P., and Iznak, A.F., Age-Specific Changes in the Hearing-Speech Memory in Boys and Girls of 6–12, Fiziol. Chel., 1999, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.L. Gorbachevskaya, E.Yu. Davydova, S.O. Petrova, S.A. Tushkevich, O.I. Pashkevich, 2010, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2010, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 66–73.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorbachevskaya, N.L., Davydova, E.Y., Petrova, S.O. et al. The importance of biological and social factors for academic performance. Hum Physiol 36, 305–311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119710030084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119710030084

Key words

Navigation