Skip to main content
Log in

Specificity of switching attention in mechanisms of visual thinking in hemispheres of the human brain

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results of experiments on the sequence of stages of visual perception and theoretical notions on the structure of invariant descriptions of classes of visual objects are considered. Two interrelated theses on the mechanisms of visual thinking in the hemispheres of the human brain are substantiated: (1) in visual thinking each hemisphere of the human brain uses (the “a part through parts”) structural principle of describing objects and scenes; and (2) differences in visual recognition and classification between the dominant (with respect to speech) and subdominant hemispheres are related to the mechanisms of the switching attention system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zinchenko, V.P. and Vergiles, N.Yu., Formirovanie zritel’nogo obraza (Formation of Visual Image), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pritchard, R.M., mstabilized Images on the Retina), Sci. Am., 1961, vol. 294, p. 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kapran, V.I., Fragmentation of a Stabilized Image as a Means for Studying Microgenesis of Perception, in Trudy VNIITE. Ergonomika. 19. Issledovanie funktsional’noi struktury ispolnitel’noi deyatel’nosti (Proceedings of All-Union Scientific and Technical Institute of Technical Esthetics. Ergonomics. 19. Study of Functional Structure of Executive Activity), Moscow, 1980, p. 122.

  4. Kurtev, A.D. and Penchev, A.N., Recognition of Visual Patterns and High Frequency Deficit, Acta Physiol. Pharmac. Belg., 1991, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leushina, L.I. and Nevskaya, A.A., Differences between Hemispheres in Processing of Visual Information and Recognition of Visual Images, in Funktsional’naya mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya (Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry), Moscow: Nauchnyi Mir, 2004, p. 293.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krol, V.M., Psikhologiya (Psychology), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R.S., Smith, E.E., et al., Introduction to Psychology, New York, Hartcourt College, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biedermann, I., Recognition by Components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding, Psychol. Rev., 1987, vol. 94, p. 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Solso, R.L., Kognitivnaya psikhologiya (Cognitive Psychology), Moscow: Trivola, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yamane, S., Kaji, S., and Kawano, K., What Facial Features Active Face Neurons in the Inferotemporal Cortex of the Monkey, Exp. Brain Res., 1988, vol. 73, no. 1, p. 209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodman, M.R., Scalaidhe, S., and Gross, C., Response Properties of Neurons in Temporal Cortical Visual Areas of Infant Monkeys, J. Neurophysiol., 1993, vol. 70, no. 3, p. 1115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobatake, E. and Tanaka, K., Neuronal Selectivities Complex Object Feature in the Ventral Visual Pathway of the Macaque Cerebral Cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 1994, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 856.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikami, A., Nakamura, K., and Kubota, K., Neuronal Responses to Photographs in the Superior Temporal Silcus of Rhesus Monkeys, Behav. Brain, 1994, vol. 60, no. 1, p. 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamura, K., Matsumoto, K., Mikami, A., and Kubota, K., “Visual Responses Properties of Single Neurons in Temporal Pole of Behaving Monkeys,” J. Neurophysiol., 1994, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 1206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito, M., Tamura, H., Fujita, I., et al., Size and Position Invariance of Neuronal Responses in Monkey Interotemporal Cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 1995, vol. 73, no. 1, p. 218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Logothetis, N.K., Pauls, J., and Poggio, T., Shape Representation in the Inferior Temporal Cortex of Monkey, Curr. Biol., 1995, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 552.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perrett, D.I., Smith, P.A., Potter, D.D., et al., Visual Cells in the Temporal Cortex Sensitive to Face View and Gaze Direction, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1995.

  18. Al’tman, Ya.A., Balonov, L.Ya., and Deglin, V.L., On Ignoring the Left Side of Space Under Conditions of Temporary Inactivation of the Right Hemisphere, Tr. Mosk. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Psikhiatrii Min. Zdravookhr. RSFSR, 1976, vol. 78, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deglin, V.L., Ivashina, G.G., and Nikolaenko, N.N., The Role of Dominant and Nondominant Brain Hemispheres in the Image of Space, in Neiropsikhologicheskii analiz mezhpolusharnoi asimmetrii mozga (Neuropsychological Analysis of Brain Interhemispheric Asymmetry), Moscow: Nauka, 1986, p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luriya, A.R., Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka (Higher Cortical Functions in Humans), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kok, E.P., Zritel’nye agnozii (Visual Agnosia), Moscow: Meditsina, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kok, E.P., Common and Different in Higher Functions of Symmetric Regions of the Right and Left Hemisphers of the Brain, Fiziol. Chel., 1975, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 427.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dobrokhotova, T.A. and Bragina, N.P., Funktsional’naya asimmetriya i psikhopatologiya ochagovogo porazheniya mozga (Functional Asymmetry and Psychopathology of the Focal Brain Damage), Moscow: Meditsina, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dobrokhotova, T.A., Bragina, N.P., Zaitsev, O.S., et al., Importance of Neurosurgery in the Study of Brain-Mind Relations, in Funktsional’naya mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya (Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry), Moscow: Nauchnyi Mir, 2004, p. 544.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gazzaniga, M., The Split Human Brain, in Vospriyatie: Mekhanizmy i modeli (Perception Mechanisms and Models), Alekseenko, N.Yu., Ed., Moscow: Mir, 1974, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gazzaniga, M.S. and Le Doux, J.E., The Integrated Mind, New York: Plenum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Springer, S. and Deich, G., Levyi mozg, pravyi mozg: Asimmetriya mozga (The Left Brain, the Right Brain: Brain Asymmetry), Moscow, 1983.

  28. Gianotty, G., D’Erme, P., Monteleone, D., and Silvere, M.C., Mechanisms of Unilateral Spation Neglect in Relation to Lateralization of Cerebral Lesions, Brain, 1986, vol. 109, no. 4, p. 599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. De Renzi, E., Disorders of Visual Recognition, Semin. Neurol., 2000, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Korchazhinskaya, V.I. and Popova, L.T., Mozg i prostranstvennoe vospriyatie (Brain and Spatial Perception), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sergeenko, E.A. and Dozortseva, A.V., Funktsional’naya asimmetriya polusharii mozga. Funktsional’naya mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya (Functional Asymmetry of Brain Hemisphers. Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry), Moscow: Nauchnyi Mir, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Krol, V.M., Model of Invariant Recognition of Classes of Visual Images, Naukoemkie Tekhnol., 2006, no. 4–5, p. 67.

  33. Nebes, R.D., Superiority of the Minor Hemisphere in Commissurotomized Man for the Perception of Part-Whole Relations, Cortex, 1971, vol. 7, nos. 3–4, p. 333.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nebes, R.D., Dominance of the Minor Hemisphere in Commissurotomized Man on a Test of Figural Unification, Brain, 1972, vol. 95, no. 3, p. 633.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nebes, R.D., Perception of Relationships by the Right and Left Hemisphere in Commissurotomized Man, Neuropsychologia, 1973, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pernet, C., Basan, S., Doyon, B., et al., Neural Timing of Visual Implicit Categorization, Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 2003, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Levy, J., Trevarthn, C., and Sperry, R.W., Perception of Bilateral Chimeric Figures Following Hemispheric Disconnection, Brain, 1972, vol. 95, no. 1, p. 61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bloom, F.E., Lazerson, A., and Hofstadter, L., Brain, Mind, and Behavior, New York: Freeman, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tsvetovskii, S.B., The Efficiency of Solving Spatial Tasks in Relation to Memory Characteristics and Functional Specialization of Brain Hemispheres, Psikhol. Zh., 1993, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Laeng, B. and Caviness, V.S., Prosopagnosia As a Deficit in Encoding Curved Surface, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 2001, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mason, M.F. and Macrae, C.N., Categorizing and Individuating Others: The Neural Substrates of Person Perception, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 2004, vol. 16, no. 10, p. 1785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rossion, B. and Caldara, R., Seghier M., et al., A Network of Occipito-Temporal Face-Sensitive Areas Besides the Right Middle Fusiform Gyrus Is Necessary for Normal Face Processing, Brain, 2003, vol. 126, p. 2381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schiltz, C., Sorger, B., Caldara, R., et al., Impaired Face Discrimination in Acquired Prosopagnosia Is Associated with Abnormal Response to Individual Faces in the Right Middle Fusiform Gyrus, Cerebr. Cortex, 2006, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Meerson, Ya.A. and Zal’tsman, A.G., On Signs Used by Brain Hemispheres in Recognition of Geometric Figures, Fiziol. Chel., 1989, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Delis, D.S., Robertson, L.S., and Efron, R., Hemispheric Specialization of Memory for Visual Hierarchial Stimuli, Neuropsychology, 1986, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Weintraub, S. and Messalum, M.M., Right Cerebral Dominance in Spatial Attention. Farther Evidence Based on Ipsilateral Neglect, Arch. Neurol., 1987, vol. 44, no. 6, p. 621.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hartje, W., Reul, J., and Wilmes, K., Left Hemispheric Interference with Nonverbal Performance in Aphasion: Comparision with Date from Split-Brain Studies, Brain Cogn., 1988, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Robertson, L.C., Lamb, M.R., and Knight, R.T., Effect of Lesions in Temporal-Parietal Junction on Perceptual and Attentional Processing in Humans, J. Neurosci., 1988, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 3757.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hellige, J., Hemispheric Asymmetry, Ann. Rev. Psychol., 1990, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ladavas, E., Petronio, A., and Umilta, C., The Deployment of Visual Attention in the Intact Field of Hemineglect Patients, Cortex, 1990, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 307.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Seron, X., Deloche, G., Ferrand, I., et al., Dot Counting by Brain Damaged Subjects, Brain Cogn., 1991, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Trojano, L., De Cicco, G., and Grossi, D., Copying of Procedures in Focal Brain Damage Patients, Ital. J. Neurol. Sci., 1993, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Paghera, B., Marien, P., and Vignolo, L.A., Crossed Aphasia with Left Spatial Neglect and Visual Imperception: A Case Report, Neurol. Sci., 2003, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kalinin, V.V., Brain Asymmetry and Psychopathological Symptomatics. A Neuropsychological Approach, in Funktsional’naya mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya (Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry), Moscow: Nauchnyi Mir, 2004, p. 594.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Krol, V.M., Specificity of Visual Mechanisms of the Right and Left Hemispheres in Humans, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat. im. I.P. Pavlova, 1995, vol. 45,issue 5, p. 1075.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.M. Krol, 2009, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2009, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 13–19.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krol, V.M. Specificity of switching attention in mechanisms of visual thinking in hemispheres of the human brain. Hum Physiol 35, 402–408 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709040021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709040021

Keywords

Navigation