Skip to main content
Log in

Biofeedback in optimizing psychomotor reactivity: I. Comparison of biofeedback and common performance practice

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To estimate the role of biofeedback technology in the optimization of psychomotor reactivity, 29 healthy young (aged 22.3 ± 1.5 years) musical performers were examined. On the first day of the study, they followed instructions for the voluntary control of finger motor comfort when performing musical passages for the right hand during standard performance practice without an adaptive feedback. On the second day, biofeedback was used, the muscle tone and EEG α-rhythm power being voluntarily controlled. Eventually, a biofeedback method was developed that simultaneously stimulated the activity of the EEG α rhythm and decreased the tone of the muscles not involved in the playing movement. This improved the performance in 75.8% of musicians (versus 13.8% using commonly practiced methods). The changes in the EEG parameters after effective biofeedback training were the same as in the case of successful traditional performance practice: an increase in the frequency, width, and power of the α activity and a decrease in the powers of the θ and β rhythms. The biofeedback method developed in this study can be recommended as an approach to the formation of the skills necessary for voluntarily controlling psychomotor reactivity and has prognostic implications for improving performance skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Othmer, S., Othmer, S.F., and Kaiser D.A., EEG Biofeedback: An Emerging Model for Its Global Efficacy, in Introduction to Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback, Evans, J.R. and Abarbanel, A., Eds., San Diego: Academic, 1999, p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz, M.S. and Andrasik, F., Biofeedback: A Practitioner’s Guide, New York: Guilford, 2003, 3rd edition, p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Talalai, B.I., The Problem of Controlling Muscle Tension, in Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya prepodavaniya na orkestrovykh instrumentakh: Uchebnoe posobie po kursu metodiki dlya muzykal’nykh uchebnykh zavedenii (Problems of the Improvement of Training of Performers Playing Orchestra Musical Instruments: A Musical Education Textbook on the Course of Training Methods), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Inst. Kul’tury, 1978, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hale, M., EMG Biofeedback of the Abductor Pollicis Brevis in Piano Performance, Biofeedback Self Reg., 1993, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vysochin, Yu.V., Denisenko, Yu.P., and Gordeev, Yu.V., Increase in Athletes’ Functional Capacities via Biological Feedback, Fiziol. Chel., 2005, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 93 [Hum. Physiol. (Engl. Transl.), 2005, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 324].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Powell, D.H., Treating Individuals with Debilitating Performance Anxiety: An Introduction, J. Clin. Psychol., 2004, vol. 60, no. 8, p. 801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Egner, T. and Gruzelier, J.H., Ecological Validity of Neurofeedback: Modulation of Slow Wave EEG Enhances Musical Performance, Neuroreport, 2003, vol. 14, p. 1221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernshtein, N.A., Ocherki po fiziologii dvizhenii i fiziologii aktivnosti (Notes on Movement Physiology and Activity Physiology), Moscow: Meditsina, 1966, p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pantev, C., Engelien, A., Candia, V., and Elbert, T,. Representational Cortex in Musicians: Plastic Alterations in Response to Musical Practice, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 2001, vol. 930, p. 300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bazanova, O.M., The Possibility to Use Electroencephalographic Mapping for Diagnosing Musical Talent, in Bioupravlenie: Teoriya i praktika (Kollektivnaya monografiya Rossiya-SShA) (Biofeedback: Theory and Practice (A Russian-United States Collective Monograph)), Shtark, M.B. and Schwartz, M., Eds., 2002, issue 4, p. 311.

  11. Hatfield, B.D., Haufler, A.J., Hung, T.M., and Spalding, T.W., Electroencephalographic Studies of Skilled Psychomotor Performance, J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2004, vol. 21,issue 3, p. 144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baevskii, R.M., Prognozirovanie sostoyanii na grani normy i patologii (Prediction of States at the Borderline between Norm and Pathology), Moscow: Meditsina, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kraus, E., Studying Music in the Federal Republic of Germany: Study Guide, Schott, 1982/1983, p. 123.

  14. Dzhafarova, O.A. and Shtark, M.B., Computer-Aided Biofeedback Systems: Trends of Development, Med. Tekhnika, 2002, vol. 1, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Angelakis, E., Lubar, J.F., and Stathopoulouc, S., Electroencephalographic Peak Alpha Frequency Correlates of Cognitive Traits, Neurosci. Lett., 2004, vol. 371, no. 16, p. 60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gusel’nikov, V.I. and Iznak, A.F., Ritmicheskaya aktivnost’v sensornykh sistemakh (Rhythmic Activity in Sensory Systems), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1983, p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaiser, D.A., Rethinking Standard Bands, J. Neurother., 2002, vol. 5, p. 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klimesch, W., EEG Alpha and Theta Oscillations Reflect Cognitive and Memory Performance: A Review and Analysis, Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev., 1999, vol. 29, p. 169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirnarskaya, D.K., Kiyashchenko, N.I., Tarasova, K.V., and Tsypin, G.M., Psikhologiya muzykal’noi deyatel’nosti. Teoriya i praktika: Uchebnoe posobie (The Psychology of Musical Activity. Theory and Practice: A Textbook), Tsypin, G.M., Ed., Moscow: Akademiya, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Altenmuller, E., Focal Dystonia: Advances in Brain Imging and Understanding of Fine Motor Control in Musicians, Hand Clin., 2003, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamijo, K., Nishihira, Y., Hatta, A., et al., Changes in Arousal Level by differential Exercise Intensity, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2004, vol. 115, issue 12, p. 2693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerick, S.E., Douglass, L.W., and Hatfield, B.D., Cerebral Cortical Adaptations Associated with Visuomotor Practice, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 2004, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nunez, H.L., Toward a Quantitative Estimation of Large-Scale Neocortical Dynamic Function and EEG, Behav. Brain Sci., 2000, vol. 23, p. 371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Iznak, A.F., Modulation of Human Sensorimotor Activity against the Background of the EEG α Rhythm, in Problemy razvitiya nauchnykh issledovanii v oblasti psikhologii zdorov’ya (Problems in the Development of Research in Health Psychology), Moscow: Min. Zdrav. SSSR, Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR, 1989, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shchukin, T.N., Dorokhov, V.B., Lebedev, A.N., and Lutsenko, E.V., EEG Prediction of Success in a Psychomotor Test under the Conditions of a Decreased Wakefulness Level: Setting the Problem, Nauchn. Zh. Kub-GAU, 2004, no. 4, issue 6, p. 9.

  26. Lotze, G.M., Schelera, H.-R., Tand, M., et al., The Musician’s Brain: Functional Imaging of Amateurs and Professionals during Performance and Imagery, Neuroimage, 2003, vol. 20,issue 3, no. 11, p. 1817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bazanova, O.M. and Shtark, M.B., Neurofeedback in Optimizing Musical Performance, Byull. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk, 2004, vol. 113, no. 3, p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hanslmayr, S., Sauseng, P., Doppelmayr, M., et al., Increasing Individual Upper Alpha Power by Neurofeedback Improves Cognitive Performance in Human Subjects, Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2005, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © O.M. Bazanova, M.B. Shtark, 2007, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2007, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 24–32.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazanova, O.M., Shtark, M.B. Biofeedback in optimizing psychomotor reactivity: I. Comparison of biofeedback and common performance practice. Hum Physiol 33, 400–408 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119707040044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119707040044

Keywords

Navigation