Skip to main content
Log in

The meaning of the Weber-Fechner law and description of scenes in terms of neural networks

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt was made to determine to which functions of the visual cortex the Weber-Fechner law pertains. Pairs of lines were presented in different halves of the visual field. One of them was a reference line with an unchanged length, and the other (the test line) was of variable length. Psychometric curves reflecting the probability of the answer that the test line was longer than the reference one were plotted. A neuronal scheme for calculating the subjective reference stimulus, which differed from the objective reference stimulus, was proposed. The central zone of the visual field was determined. Two psychometric curves were obtained in the zone of each hemisphere. One of them was based on the results of tests where the test stimulus was presented above the reference stimulus and the other, on those where the test stimulus was below the reference one. The mutual positions of the curves were asymmetric in the hemispheres. One psychometric curve was obtained outside the central zone in each hemisphere. There was no dependence on the positions of the test and reference stimuli. The obtained data, according to which ΔL = const in the central zone and ΔL/L = const outside it, served as the basis for postulating the existence of three neuronal mechanisms. One of them is responsible for the interaction of neural networks between the hemispheres and serves for describing the scene, estimating the perspective, and determining the relative distances between objects. The second and third mechanisms are responsible for the interactions within the left and right hemispheres and serve only for describing the scene. Only the mechanism of describing the scene operates outside the central zone. It is assumed that the three postulated mechanisms, together with the mechanism of image recognition, create the visual image of the world perceived by the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vision and Visual Perception, Graham, C.H., Ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Visual Psychophysics, Jameson, D. and Hurvich, L.M., Eds., Berlin: Springer, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Watt, R.J. and Andrews, D.P., APE: Adaptive Probit Estimates of Psychometric Functions, Curr. Psychol. Rev., 1981, vol. 1, p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Regan, D. and Humstra, S.J., Shape Discrimination and the Judgment of Perfect Symmetry: Dissociation of Shape from Size, Vision Res., 1992, vol. 32, p. 1845.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glezer, V.D., Nevskaya, A.A., Chernova, N.D., and Gauzel’man, V.E., Separate Learning of Visual Recognition by the Individual Brain Hemispheres under the Conditions of Interhemispheric Transmission Block by Masking, Fiziol. Zh., 2003, vol. 89, no. 10, p. 1177.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Finney, D.J., Probit Analysis, New York: Cambridge Univ., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.D. Glezer, 2007, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2007, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 5–14.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glezer, V.D. The meaning of the Weber-Fechner law and description of scenes in terms of neural networks. Hum Physiol 33, 257–266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119707030012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119707030012

Keywords

Navigation