Programming and Computer Software

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 314–322 | Cite as

Social network technologies for semantic linking of information objects in scientific digital library

Article

Abstract

In the last decade, scientific digital libraries were traditionally used for publishing research results and for enabling wide open access to them. Functional capabilities of digital libraries can be extended by offering users the opportunity of linking information objects of the library and providing for created linkages explicitly defined semantics based on a given ontology. Such an activity of users, which is peculiar to social networks, motivated by different reasons, and carried out on their own initiative, results in the dynamic semantic structure of the digital library content. In the environment of such a kind of a social network, certain new forms of scientific activities become possible and data sources can be created that provide more information for scientometric researches as compared to presently available ones. In this paper, we propose an approach for creating such networks and discuss results of its implementation in the Socionet environment; the Socionet is a large-scale online information space that covers information resources of a number of scientific, educational, etc. organizations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kogalovsky, M.R. and Parinov, S.I., Semantic structuring of the content of scientific digital libraries based on ontologies, in Sovremennye tekhnologii integratcii informatsionnykh resursov: sbornik nauchnykh trudov (Modern Technologies for Integration of Information Recourses: Collection of Papers), St. Petersburg: Boris Yeltsin Presidential Library, 2011, pp. 26–45.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dix, A., Levialdi, S., and Malizia, A., Semantic halo for collaboration tagging systems, in Social Navigation and Community-Based Adaptation Technologies Workshop, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parinov, S., Kogalovsky, M., and Lyapunov, V., A challenge of research outputs in GL circuit: From open access to open use, 15th Int. Conf. on Grey Literature, The Grey audit: A Field Assessment in Grey Literature, Bratislava, 2013. http://www.textrelease.com/gl15callforpapers.html.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parinov, S. and Kogalovsky, M., Semantic linkages in research information systems as a new data source for scientometric studies, Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 927–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CERIF 1.3 semantics: Research vocabulary, CERIF Task Group, euroCRIS. http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.3/Specifications/CERIF1.3Semantics.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Semantic Web applications in neuromedicine (SWAN) ontology, W3C Interest Group Note. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-hcls-swan-20091020/.
  7. 7.
    Shotton, D., Introduction the semantic publishing and referencing (SPAR) ontologies. http://opencitations.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/introducing-the-semantic-publishing-and-referencing-spar-ontologies/.
  8. 8.
    Shotton, D. and Peroni, S., Semantic annotation of publication entities using the SPAR (Semantic Publishing and Referencing) ontologies. http://imageweb.zoo.ox.ac.uk/pub/2010/Publications/Shotton&Peronisemantic-annotation-of-publication-entities.pdf.
  9. 9.
    SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System reference, W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/.
  10. 10.
    Kogalovsky, M.R. and Parinov, S.I., Use of citation linkages for scientometric measurements in the Socionet system. http://socionet.ru/publication.xml?h=repec:rus:rssalc:web-32.
  11. 11.
    Berners-Lee, T., Linked Data, World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Linked-Data.html.
  12. 12.
    Jorg, B., Ruiz-Rube, I., Sicilia, M., Dvorak, J., Jeffery, K., Hoellrigl, T., et al., Connecting closed world research information systems through the linked open data web, Int. J. Software Engineering Knowledge Engineering, 2012, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Open Annotation Collaboration. http://www.openan-notation.org/.
  14. 14.
    Open Annotation Collaboration Group. http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation.
  15. 15.
    Groth, P., Gibson, A., and Velterop, J., The anatomy of a nano-publication. http://iospress.metapress.com/content/ftkh21q50t521wm2/.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Kogalovsky, M.R. and Parinov, S.I., Classification and use of semantic linkages between information objects in scientific digital libraries, Informatika i ee primeneniya, 2012, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 32–42.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parinov, S.I. and Kogalovsky, M.R., Technology for semantic structuring the content of scientific digital libraries, Trudy XIII Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferencii “Elektronnye biblioteki: perspektivnye metody i tekhnologii, elektronnye kollektcii” (Proc. XIII All-Russian Sci. Conf. “Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections”), Voronezh, 2011, pp. 94–103.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parinov, S., Open repository of semantic linkages, in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Current Research Information Systems e-Infrastructure for Research and Innovations (CRIS 2012), Prague, 2012. http://socionet.ru/publication.xml?h=repec:rus:mqijxk:29.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parinov, S., Towards a semantic segment of a research e-infrastructure: necessary information objects, tools and services, Metadata and Semantics Research, Communications in Computer and Information Science, Dodero, J.M., Palomo-Duarte, M., and Karampiperis, P., Eds., Springer, 2012, vol. 343, pp. 133–145. http://socionet.ru/pub.xml?h=RePEc:rus:mqijxk:30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parinov, S.I., Lyapunov, V.M., and Puzyrev, R.L., Socionet system as a platform for developing scientific information resources and online services. http://www.elbib.ru/index.phtml?page=elbib/rus/journal/2003/part1/PLP.
  22. 22.
    Open Archives Initiative. http://www.openarchives.org/.
  23. 23.
    F1000Research, The first Open Science journal for life scientists. http://f1000research.com/.
  24. 24.
    CERIF 1.3 Full Data Model (FDM): Introduction and Specification, euroCRIS. http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.3/Specifications/CERIF1.3-FDM.pdf.
  25. 25.
    Parinov, S., Towards a semantic segment of a research e-infrastructure: necessary information objects, tools and services, Metadata and Semantics Research, Communications in Computer and Information Science, Dodero, J.M., Palomo-Duarte, M., and Karampiperis, P., Eds., Springer, 2012, vol. 343, pp. 133–145. http://socionet.ru/pub.xml?h=RePEc:rus:mqijxk:30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kogalovsky, M.R., Ontological annotation of references in scientific publications and its use in scientometrics, Informatsionnye resursy Rossii, 2013, no. 5, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klekovkina, M.V. and Kotel’nikov, E.V., Method for automated classification of texts by tonality based on the vocabulary of emotional lexis, Trudy 14-i Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferencii “Elektronnye biblioteki: perspektivnye metody i tekhnologii, elektronnye kollekcii” (Proc. 14th All-Russian Sci. Conf. “Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections”), Pereslavl-Zalessky, 2012, pp. 118–123.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feldman, R., Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis, Communications of the ACM, 2013, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Galassini, C., Malizia, A., and Bellucci, A., An approach for developing intelligent systems for sentiment analysis over social networks, Intelligent Systems and Control /742: Computational Bioscience, Whidborne, J.F., Willis, P., and Montana, G., Eds., Cambridge, 2011.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pang, B. and Lee, L., Opinion mining and sentiment analysis, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2008, vol. 2, nos. 1–2., pp. 1–135. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1454712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Small, H., Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation, Scientometrics, 2011, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shotton, D., CiTO: The citation typing ontology. http://www.jbiomedsem.com/content/1/S1/S6.
  33. 33.
    Shotton, D. and Peroni, S., CiTO: The citation typing ontology, version 2.0. http://purl.org/spar/cito/.
  34. 34.
    Shotton, D. and Peroni, S., DoCO: The document components ontology. http://speroni.web.cs.unibo.it/cgibin/lode/req.py?req=http:/purl.org/spar/doco.
  35. 35.
    The Open Archives Initiative protocol for metadata harvesting, version 2.0. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/openarchivesprotocol.htm.

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Market Economy InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Central Economics and Mathematics InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations