Abstract
We first observe that the Path topology of Hawking, King and MacCarthy is an analogue, in curved space-times, of a topology that was suggested by Zeeman as an alternative topology to his so-called Fine topology in Minkowski space-time. We then review a result of a recent paper on spaces of paths and the Path topology, and see that there are at least five more topologies in the class \(\mathfrak{Z}-\mathfrak{G}\) of Zeeman-Göbel topologies which admit a countable basis, incorporate the causal and conformal structures, but the Limit Curve Theorem (LCT) fails to hold. The “problem” that the LCT does not hold can be resolved by “adding back” the light cones in the basic-open sets of these topologies, and create new basic open sets for new topologies. But, the main question is: do we really need the LCT. to hold, and why? Why is the manifold topology, under which the group of homeomorphisms of a space-time is vast and of no physical significance (Zeeman), more preferable than an appropriate topology in the class \(\mathfrak{Z}-\mathfrak{G}\) under which a homeomorphism is an isometry (Göbel)? Since topological conditions that come as a result of a causality requirement are key in the existence of singularities in general relativity, the global topological conditions that one will supply the space-time manifold might play an important role in describing the transition from a quantum nonlocal theory to a classical local theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.H. Kronheimer and R. Penrose, “On the structure of causal spaces,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 63, 481 (1967).
R. Penrose, “Techniques of differential topology in relativity,” in: CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, 1972.
Chris Good and Kyriakos Papadopoulos, “A topological characterization of ordinals: van Dalen and Wattel revisited,” Topology Appl. 159, 1565–1572 (2012).
Kyriakos Papadopoulos, “On the orderability problem and the interval topology,” in: Topics in Mathematical Analysis and Applications, in “Optimization and Its Applications” Springer Series, Eds. T. Rassias and L. Toth (Springer-Verlag, 2014).
Gerhard Gierz, Karl Heinrich Hoffmann, Klaus Keimel, Jimmie D. Lawson, Michael W. Mislove, and Dana S. Scott, A Compendium of Continuous Lattices (Springer-Verlag, 1980).
Robert J. Low, “Spaces of paths and the path topology,” J. Math. Phys. 57, 092503 (2016).
E. C. Zeeman, “The topology of Minkowski space,” Topology 6, 161–170 (1967).
Göbel, “Zeeman topologies on space-times of general relativity theory,” Comm. Math. Phys. 46, 289–307 (1976).
E. C. Zeeman, “Causality implies the Lorentz group,” J. Math. Phys. 5, 490–493 (1964).
Ignatios Antoniadis, Spiros Cotsakis, and Kyriakos Papadopoulos, “The causal order on the ambient boundary,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 31, Issue 20 (2016).
G. M. Reed, “The intersection topology w.r.t. the real line and the countable ordinals,” Trans. Am. Math. Society 297, 509–520 (1986).
Kyriakos Papadopoulos, “On the possibility of singularities on the ambient boundary,” Int. J. Geom. Methods in Mod. Phys. 14, No. 10 (2017).
S. W. Hawking, A. R. King, and P. J. McCarthy, “A new topology for curved space-time which incorporates the causal, differential, and conformal structures,” J. Math. Phys. 17, 174–181 (1976).
Kyriakos B. Papadopoulos, Santanu Acharjee, and Basil K. Papadopoulos, “The order on the light cone and its induced topology,” Int. J. Geom. Methods in Mod. Phys. 15, 1850069 (2018).
Kyriakos B. Papadopoulos and Basil K. Padopoulos, “On two topologies that were suggested by Zeeman,” arXiv: 1706.07488.
Kyriakos Papadopoulos, “On properties of nests: some answers and questions,” Questions and Answers in General Topology 33, No. 2 (2015).
Kyriakos Papadopoulos, “Nests and their role in the orderability problem,” in: Mathematical Analysis, Approximation Theory and Their Applications, Eds. Th. M. Rassians and V. Gupta (Springer, 2016), pp. 517–533.
David B. Malament, “The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of space-time,” J. Math. Phys. 19, 1399 (1977).
R. Geroch, “Domain of dependence,” J. Math. Phys. 11, 437–449 (1970).
Seth Major, “On recovering continuum topology from a causal set,” J. Math. Phys. 48, 032501, (2007).
Onkar Parrikar and Sumati Surya, “Causal topology in future and past distinguishing space-times,” Class. Quantum Grav. 28, No 15 (2011).
R. D. Sorkin, “Does locality fail at intermediate length scales?” in Approaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter, Ed. D. Oriti (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. 2009), pp. 26–43.
Nikolaos Kalogeropoulos, “Systolic aspects of black hole entropy,” arXiv: 1711.09963.
Acknowledgment
K.P. would like to thank Robert Low for his comments on the interval topology, Fabio Scardigli for discussions on the topological structure of spacetime, and Nikolaos Kalogeropoulos for inspiring discussions on quantum gravity, based on his article [23].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papadopoulos, K., Papadopoulos, B.K. Space-time Singularities vs. Topologies in the Zeeman—Göbel Class. Gravit. Cosmol. 25, 116–121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289319020117
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289319020117