Skip to main content
Log in

Crossing the phantom boundary in f(R) modified gravity: Jordan vs. Einstein frames

  • Published:
Gravitation and Cosmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the capability of f(R) gravity models to allow for crossing the phantom boundary in both Jordan and Einstein conformal frames. In the Einstein frame, these models are equivalent to Einstein gravity with a scalar field minimally coupled to gravity. This scalar degree of freedom appears as a quintessence field with a coupling to the matter sector. We investigate the evolution of the equation of state parameter for some cosmologically viable f(R) gravity models in both conformal frames. This investigation (beyond mere theoretical arguments) acts as an operational tool to distinguish the physical status of the two conformal frames. It shows that this status is not the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043528 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. M. Carroll, A. De Felice, V. Duvvuri, D. A. Easson, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 71, 063513 (2005); G. Allemandi, A. Browiec, and M. Francaviglia, Phys. Rev. D 70, 103503 (2004); X. Meng and P. Wang, Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 951 (2004); M. E. Soussa and R. P. Woodard, Gen. Rel. Grav. 36, 855 (2004); S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123512 (2003); P. F. Gonzalez-Diaz, Phys. Lett. B 481, 353 (2000); K. A. Milton, Grav. Cosmol. 9, 66 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3159 (1989); D. Wands, Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 269 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Magnano and L. M. Sokolowski, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5039 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Bisabr, Phys. Lett. B 690, 456 (2010); Phys. Rev. D 82, 124041 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. Scherrer and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev.D 77, 083515 (2008); Phys. Rev. D 78, 067303 (2008); S. Dutta, E. N. Saridakis, and R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D 79, 103504 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Vikman, Phys. Rev. D 71, 023515 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 63, 103510 (2001);A.Melchiorri, L. Mersini, C. J. Odman, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D 68, 043509 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. R. Caldwell and M. Doran, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043527 (2005); W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 71, 047301 (2005); Z. K. Guo, Y. S. Piao, X. M. Zhang, and Y. Z. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 608, 177 (2005); B. Feng, X. L. Wang, and X. M. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 607, 35 (2005); B. Feng, M. Li, Y. S. Piao, and X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 634, 101 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Perivolaropoulos, JCAP 0510, 001 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Faraoni, E. Gunzig, and P. Nardone, Fund. Cosmic Phys. 20, 121 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. H. Dick, Phys. Rev. 125, 2163 (1962); J.D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1313 (1980); V. Faraoni, Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Faraoni and E. Gunzig, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 217 (1999); K. Nozari and S. D. Sadatian, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 3143 (2009); S. Capozziello, P. Martin-Moruno, and C. Rubano, Phys. Lett. B 689, 117 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 652, 343 (2007); Phys. Lett. B 657, 238 (2007); L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski, and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 75, 083504 (2007); G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani, and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 77, 046009 (2008); A. Dev, D. Jain, S. Jhingan, S. Nojiri, M. Sami, and I. Thongkool, Phys. Rev. D 78, 083515 (2008); T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. D. Dolgov and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Lett. B 573, 1 (2003).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. G. Gong and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 73, 083506 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Komatsu et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 18 (2011); M. Sullivan at al., Astrophys. J. 737, 102 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Gong and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 75, 043520 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. C. A. Shapiro and M. S. Turner, astro-ph/0512586.

  20. S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, S. Carloni and A. Troisi, Int. J.Mod. Phys. D 12, 1969 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski, and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 75, 083504 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 86, 157 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. E. E. Flanagan, Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 3817 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Bisabr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bisabr, Y. Crossing the phantom boundary in f(R) modified gravity: Jordan vs. Einstein frames. Gravit. Cosmol. 18, 143–150 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S020228931202003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S020228931202003X

Keywords

Navigation