Skip to main content
Log in

Morphology of Dune-Like Relief in Rivers

  • HYDROPHYSICAL PROCESSES
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Linearized equations of two-dimensional hydraulics have been analyzed by the method of small perturbations within a wide range of alluvial features sizes at large values of Froude numbers and hydraulic resistance. The preservation of three-dimensional effects in depth-averaged equations of motion, continuity, and deformation enabled the authors to identify domains with combinations of flow hydraulic characteristics that correspond to alluvial features of different size and morphology. The study confirmed the results of the earlier analysis for subcritical flows with small hydraulic resistance and showed new types of relationships between alluvial features morphology and the hydraulic characteristics of flow for flows with large Froude numbers and high hydraulic resistance. In addition, a relationship between the length of two-dimensional ultramicroforms and hydraulic resistance has been established. A new class of macroforms—two-dimensional macroforms—have been identified. The verification of the results of theoretical analysis by measurements data on the morphology of channel formations and hydraulic characteristics of the flow has shown that the analysis of linearized equations of two-dimensional hydrodynamics by small-perturbation method can be used to determine the morphology and dimensions of channel forms in both subcritical and supercritical streams. The step–pool systems in torrential streams in mountain rivers are analogues of antidunes (in supercritical flows) and ripples (in subcritical flows), obtained in large flumes with sand alluvium. Three-dimensional macroforms are most common in rivers. If such macroforms are well developed in wide channels (at flow width greater than the half-width of the macroform), their length is determined by channel depth. Macroforms in narrower channels cannot develop completely, and their lengths are limited by channel width and can be calculated only through this width.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Velikanov, M.A., Gidrologiya sushi (Land Hydrology), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1948.

  2. Grishanin, K.V., Ustoichivost’ rusel rek i kanalov (Bed Stability of Rivers and Channels), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1974.

  3. Kartvelishvili, N.A., Potoki v nedeformiruemykh ruslakh (Flows in Nondeforming Channels), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1973.

  4. Kochin, N.E., Kibel’, I.A., and Roze, N.V., Teoreticheskaya gidromekhanika (Theoretical Hydromechanics), Moscow: Gostekhizdat, 1948, part 2.

  5. Lin’, Ts.Ts., Teoriya gidrodinamicheskoi ustoichivosti (Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability), Moscow: Izd. inostr. lit, 1958.

  6. Makkaveev, N.I., Ruslo reki i eroziya v ee basseine (River Channel and Erosion in Its Basin), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1955.

  7. Mikhinov, A.E., Instability of bedforms in an erodible channel, Meteorol. Gidrol., 1983, no. 11, pp. 84–91.

  8. Rozovskii, I.L., Dvizhenie vody na povorote otkrytogo rusla (Water Motion in an Open Channel Bend), Kiev: Akad. Nauk USSR, 1957.

  9. Sidorchuk, A.Yu., Struktura rel’efa rechnogo rusla (Relief Structure of River Channel), St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 1992.

  10. Anderson, A.G., On the development of stream meanders, Proc. 12th Congress IAHR, Fort Collins, 1967, vol. 1, pp. 370–378.

  11. Callander, R.A., Instability and river channels, J. Fluid Mech., 1969, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombini, M., A decade’s investigation of the stability of erodible stream beds, J. Fluid Mech., 2014, vol. 756, pp. 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Colombini, M., Revisiting the linear theory of sand dune formation, J. Fluid Mech., 2004, vol. 502, pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Curran, J.H. and Wilcock, P.R., Characteristic dimensions of the step-pool bed configuration: an experimental study, Water Resour. Res., 2005, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Curran, J.H. and Wohl, E.E., Large woody debris and flow resistance in step-pool channels, cascade range, Washington, Geomorphology, 2003, vol. 51, pp. 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fredsoe, J., Meandering and braiding of rivers, J. Fluid Mech., 1978, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 609–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grant, G.E., Swanson, F.J., and Wolman, M.G., Pattern and origin of stepped-bed morphology in high-gradient streams, Western Cascades, Oregon, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1990, vol. 102, pp. 340–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guy, H.P., Simons, D.B., and Richardson, E.V., Summary of alluvial channel data from flume experiments 1956-61, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1966, 462-I, pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harnischmacher, S., Thresholds in small rivers? Hypotheses developed from fluvial morphological research in Western Germany, Geomorphology, 2007, vol. 92, pp. 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrison, L.R. and Keller, E.A., Modeling forced pool–riffle hydraulics in a boulder-bed stream, southern California, Geomorphology, 2007, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kennedy, J.F., The mechanics of dunes and antidunes in erodible-bed channels, J. Fluid Mech., 1963, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 521–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, A.J., The hydraulics of steep streams, Ph. D. Dissertation, Sheffield: Univ. Sheffield, 1998.

  23. Lenzi, M.A., Step-pool evolution in the Rio Cordon, Northeastern Italy, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 2001, vol. 26, pp. 991–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nickolotsky, A. and Pavlowsky, R.T., Morphology of step-pools in a wilderness headwater stream: The importance of standardizing geomorphic measurements, Geomorphology, 2007, vol. 83, pp. 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parker, G., On the cause and characteristic scales of meandering and braiding in rivers, J. Fluid Mech., 1976, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 457–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sidorchuk, A., The structure of river bed relief, Coherent Flow Structures in Open Channels, Chichester: Wiley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Whittaker, J.G., Flow and sediment movement in stepped channels, Ph. D. Dissertation, Canterbury: Univ. Canterbury, 1982.

  28. Wohl, E.E. and Wilcox, A., Channel geometry of mountain streams in New Zealand, J. Hydrol., 2005, vol. 300, pp. 252–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was carried out under the project: “Evolution and Transformation of Erosion-Channel Systems under Changing Environment and Human Impact” (GO) (government financing, section 0110, no. I.13, TsITIS no. АААА-А16-116032810084-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Yu. Sidorchuk.

Additional information

Translated by G. Krichevets

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sidorchuk, A.Y. Morphology of Dune-Like Relief in Rivers . Water Resour 47, 65–76 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807820010133

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807820010133

Keywords:

Navigation