Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical analysis of structural variations of benthic communities and testing the hypothesis of river continuum

  • Water Quality and Protection: Environmental Aspects
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical methods for assessing the spatial distribution of benthic communities in different parts of watercourses have been considered as applied to lowland rivers of the Lower Volga region. The applicability domains are described for different response models, gradient analysis, and random skewers methods, which are used to analyze the distribution of aquatic organisms in bottom sediments. Stationarity and autocorrelation criteria for the description of generalized characteristics of macrozoobenthos communities are analyzed. The problems of identification of statistically significant isolated zones at whose boundaries the succession change of the species composition of aquatic organisms are discussed. The results of nonparametric dispersion analysis of species similarity matrices, the formation of dendrites, and the search for barriers between individual areas are given (based on Delaunay triangulation and Monmonier’s maximal-diversity algorithm).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alimov, A.F., Elementy teorii funktsionirovaniya vodnykh ekosistem (Elements of the Theory of Aquatic Ecosystem Functioning), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bogatov, V.V., Combined concept of river ecosystem functioning, Vestnik DVO RAN, 1995, no. 3, pp. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jongman, R.H.G., ter Braak, C.J.F., and van Tongeren O.F.R., Analiz dannykh v ekologii soobshchestv i landshaftov (Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology), Moscow: RASKhN, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zinchenko, T.D., Ekologo-faunisticheskaya kharakteristika khironomid (Diptera, Chironomidae) malykh rek basseina Srednei i Nizhnei Volgi (atlas) (Ecological-Faunistic Characteristic of Chironomids (Diptera, Chironomidae) in Small Rivers in the Basins of the Middle and Lower Volga: Atlas), Tolyatti: Kassandra, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shitikov, V.K., Zinchenko, T.D., and Rozenberg, G.S., Makroekologiya rechnykh soobshchestv: kontseptsii, metody, modeli (Macroecology of Riverine Communities: Concepts, Methods, Models), Tolyatti: Kassandra, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shitikov, V.K., Rozenberg, G.S., and Zinchenko, T.D., Kolichestvennaya gidroekologiya: metody, kriterii, resheniya (Quantitative Hydroecology: Methods, Criteria, Solutions), Moscow: Nauka, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, M.J., A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance, Aust. J. Ecol., 2001, vol. 26, pp. 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benda, L., Poff, L.R., Miller, D., et al., Network dynamics hypothesis: spatial and temporal organization of physical heterogeneity in rivers, BioScience, 2004, vol. 54, pp. 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Avois-Jacquet, C., et al., Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales, Ecology, 2004, vol. 85, pp. 1826–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Connor, E.F. and Simberloff, D., The assembly of species communities: chance or competition?, Ecology, 1979, vol. 60, pp. 1132–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A., Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1979, vol. 74, pp. 427–431.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher, S.G., Barnes, J.R., and Minshall, G.W., Succession in streams, in Stream Ecology: Application and Testing of General Ecological Theory, New York: Plenum Press, 1983, pp. 7–27.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Guisan, A. and Thuillier, W., Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitats models, Ecol. Let., 2005, vol. 8, pp. 993–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huisman, J., Olff, H., and Fresco, L.F., A hierarchical set of models for species response analysis, J. Veget. Sci., 1993, vol. 4, pp. 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ljung, G.M. and Box, G.E.P., On a measure of lack of fit in time series models, Biometrika, 1978, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manni, F., Guerard, E., and Heyer, E., Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by “Monmonier’s” “algorithm,” Hum. Biol., 2004, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McGill, B.J., Strong and weak tests of macro-ecological theory, Oikos, 2003, vol. 102, pp. 679–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Montgomery, D.R., Process domains and the river continuum concept, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 1999, vol. 35, pp. 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oksanen, J. and Minchin, P.R., Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients?, Ecol. Modell., 2002, vol. 157, pp. 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perry, J.A. and Schaeffer, D.J., The longitudinal distributions of or riverine benthos: a river discontinuum?, Hydrobiologia, 1987, vol. 148, pp. 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pielou, E.C., Probing multivariate data with random skewers: a preliminary to direct gradient analysts, Oikos, 1984, vol. 42, pp. 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pillar, V.D., How sharp are classifications?, Ecology, 1999, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 2508–2516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sokal, R.R. and Oden, N.L., Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology, Biol. J. Lin. Soc., 1978, vol. 10, pp. 199–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thorp, J.H., Thoms, M.C., and DeLong, M.D., The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time, Riv. Res. & Appl., 2006, vol. 22, pp. 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Townsend, C.R., The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology, J. North Amer. Benthol. Soc., 1989, vol. 8, pp. 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Townsend, C.R., Scarsbrook, M.R., and Dolédec, S., Quantifying disturbance in streams: alternative measures of disturbance in relation to macroinvertebrate species traits and species richness, J. North Amer. Benthol. Soc., 1997, vol. 16, pp. 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vannote, R.L., Minshall, G.W., Cummins, K.W., et al., The river continuum concept, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1980, vol. 37, pp. 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yodzis, P., Competition, mortality, and community structure, in Community Ecology, Diamond, J. and Case, T., Eds. New York: Harper and Row, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. K. Shitikov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.K. Shitikov, T.D. Zinchenko, 2014, published in Vodnye Resursy, 2014, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 530–540.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shitikov, V.K., Zinchenko, T.D. Statistical analysis of structural variations of benthic communities and testing the hypothesis of river continuum. Water Resour 41, 543–552 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807814050121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807814050121

Keywords

Navigation