Water Resources

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 325–341 | Cite as

A review of the numerical modelling of salt mobilization from groundwater-surface water interactions

Interaction Between Continental Waters and the Environment

Abstract

Salinization of land and water is a significant challenge in most continents and particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. The need to accurately forecast surface and groundwater interactions has promoted the use of physically-based numerical modelling approaches in many studies. In this regard, two issues can be considered as the main research challenges. First, in contrast with surface water, there is generally less observed level and salinity data available for groundwater systems. These data are critical in the validation and verification of numerical models. The second challenge is to develop an integrated surface-groundwater numerical model that is capable of salt mobilization modelling but which can be validated and verified against accurate observed data. This paper reviews the current state of understanding of groundwater and surface water interactions with particular respect to the numerical modelling of salt mobilization. 3D physically-based fully coupled surface-subsurface numerical model with the capability of modelling density-dependent, saturated-unsaturated solute transport is an ideal tool for groundwater-surface water interaction studies. It is concluded that there is a clear need to develop modelling capabilities for the movement of salt to, from, and within wetlands to provide temporal predictions of wetland salinity which can be used to assess ecosystem outcomes.

Keywords

Floodplain Salinization Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions Numerical modelling Salt mobilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Crosbie, R.S., McEwan, K.L., Jolly, I.D., Holland, K.L., Lamontagne, S., Moe, K.G., and Simmons, C.T., Salinization risk in semi-arid floodplain wetlands subjected to engineered wetting and drying cycles, Hydrological Processes, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 3440–3452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller, C.T. and Gray, W.G., Hydrogeological research: just getting started, Ground Water, 2002, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenlee, G.M., Pauluk, S., and Bowser, W.E., Occurrences of soil salinity in drylands of southwestern Alberta, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1968, vol. 48, pp. 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steppuhn, H. and Wall, K.G., Canada’s salt tolerance testing laboratory, Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 1999, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 185–189.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steppuhn, H., Pre-irrigation of a severely-saline soil with in-situ water to establish drylandforages, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2001, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1543–1551.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halvorson, A.D. and Black, A.L., Saline seep development in dryland soils of north-eastern Montana, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1974, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Worcester, B.K., Brun, L.J., and Doering, E.J., Classification and management of saline seeps in western North Dakota, North Dakota Farm Research, 1975, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Konikow, L.F. and Person, M., Assessment of longterm salinity changes in an irrigated stream-aquifer system, Water Resources Research, 1985, vol. 21, pp. 1611–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goff, K., Lewis, M.E., Person, M.A., and Konikov, L.F., Simulated effects of irrigation on salinity in the Arkanese River valley in Colorado, Ground Water, 1998, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Vries, J.J., Seasonal expansion and contraction of stream networks in shallow saline groundwater systems, Journal of Hydrology, 1995, vol. 170, pp. 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kloosterman, F.H., Stuurman, R.J., and van der Meijden, R., Groundwater flow systems analysis on a regional and nation-wide scale in the Netherlands; the use of flow systems analysis in wetland management, Water Resources Research, 1995, vol. 31, pp. 375–378.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmid, W., Hanson, R.T., T.M.M III, and Leak, S.A., User’s guide for the Farm process (FMP) for the U.S. Geological Survey’s modular three-dimensional finitedifference ground-water flow model, MODFLOW-2000, in USGS Techniques and Methods 6-A17, 2006, USGS: Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schofield, R., Thomas, D.S.G., and Kirkby, M.J., Casual processes of soil salinisation in Tunisia, Spain and Hungary, Land Degradation and Development, 2001, vol. 12, pp. 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saiko, T.A. and Zonn, I.S., Irrigation expansion and dynamics of desertification in the Circum-Aral region of Central Asia, Applied Geography, 2000, vol. 20, pp. 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saeijs, H.L.S. and van Berkel, M.J., Global water crisis: the major issue of the 21st century, a growing and explosive problem, European Water Pollution Control, 1995, vol. 5, pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mumba, M. and Thompson, J., Hydrological and ecological impacts of dams on the Kafue Flats floodplain system, southern Zambia, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2005, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bauer, P., Gumbrich, T., and Kinzelbach, W., A regional coupled surface water/groundwater model of the Okavango Delta, Botswana, Water Resources Research, 2006, vol. 42, p. W04403.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ebert, C.H.V., Irrigation and salt problems in Renmark, South Australia, Geographical Review, 1971, no. 1, pp. 355–369.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herczeg, A.L., Dogramaci, S.S., and Leaney, F.W.. Origin of dissolved salts in a large, semi-arid groundwater system: Murray Basin, Australia, Marine and Freshwater Research, 2001, vol. 52, pp. 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jolly, I.D., Williamson, D.R., Gilfedder, M., Walker, G.R., Morton, R., Robinson G., Jones, H., Zhang, L., Dowling, T.I., Dyce, P., Nathan, R.J., Nandakumar, N., Clarke, R., and McNeill, V., Historical stream salinity trends and catchment salt balances in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, Marine and Freshwater Research, 2001, vol. 52, pp. 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    George, R.J., Management of saline seeps in the wheatbelt of Western Australia, Agricultural Water Management, 1991, vol. 19, pp. 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peck, A.J., Salinization of non-irrigated soils and associated streams: a review, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1978, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogers, B.R., Fools rush in, Part 3:Selected dryland areas of the world, Arid Lands Newsletter, 1981, vol. 14, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jolly, I.D., Narayan, K.A., Armstrong, D., and Walker, G.R., The impact of flooding on modelling salt transport processes to streams, Environmental Modelling & Software, 1998, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Person, M. and Konikow, L.F., Recalibration and predictive reliability of a solute-transport model of an irrigated stream-aquifer system, Journal of Hydrology, 1986, vol. 87, nos. 1–2, pp. 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Orlob, G.T. and Ghorbanzadeh, A., Impact of water resource development on salinization of semi-arid lands, Agricultural Water Management, 1981, vol. 4, no. 1–3, pp. 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Allison, G.B., Cook, P.G., Barnet, S.R., Walker, G.R., Jolly, I.D., and Hughes, M.W., Land clearance and river salinisation in the western Murray Basin, Australia, Journal of Hydrology, 1990, vol. 119, no. 1–4, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jolly, I.D., Walker, G.R., Hollingworth, I.D., Eldridge, S.R., Thorburn, P.J., McEwan, K.L., and Hatton, T.J., The causes of decline in eucalypt communities and possible ameliorative approaches, in Salt and Water Movement in the Chowilla Floodplain, Walker, G.R., Jolly, I.D., and Jarwal, S.D., Eds., CSIRO Division of Water Resources: Canberra, Australia, 1996.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maheshwari, B., Walker, K.F., and McMahon, T.A., Effects of regulation on the flow regime of the river Murray, Australia, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 1995, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    MDBC, Basin Salinity Management Strategy 2001–2015, 2001, Murray-Darling Basin Commision: Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leblanc, M., Tweed, S., Van Dijk, A., and Timbal B., A review of historic and future hydrological changes in teh Murray-Darling Basin, Global and Planetary Change, 2012, 80–81, pp. 226–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khublaryan, M. and V. Zyryanov, Modeling the interaction between water flows, Water Resources, 2006, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morel-Seytoux, H.J. and Daly, C.J., A discrete kernel generator for stream aquifer studies, Water Resources Research, 1975, vol. 11, pp. 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hall, F.R. and Moench, A.F., Application of the convolution equation to stream-aquifer relationships, Water Resources Research, 1972, vol. 8, pp. 487–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marino, M.A., Digital simulation model of aquifer response to stream stage fluctuation, Journal of Hydrology, 1975, vol. 25, nos. 1–2, pp. 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marino, M.A., Analysis of the transient movement of water and solutes in stream-aquifer systems, Journal of Hydrology, 1981, vol. 49, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Therrien, R., McLaren, R.G., Sudicky, E.A., and Panday, S.M., HydroGeoSphere: A Three-Dimensional Numerical Model Describing Fully-Integrated Subsurface and Surface Flow and Solute Transport, 2005, Groundwater Simulations Group, University of Waterloo: Waterloo, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., and McDonald, M.G., MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model, in User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Groundwater Flowprocess-USGS Open File Report 00-92, 2000, USGS: Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Diersch, H.J.G., Interactive, graphics-based finite-element simulation system FEFLOW for modeling groundwater flow, contaminant mass and heat transport processes, I.f.W.R.P.a.S. Research, Ed., 1996, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Holland, K.L., Charles, A.H., Jolly, I.D., Overton, I.C., Gehrig, S., and Simmons, C.T., Effectiveness of artificial watering of a semi-arid saline wetlandfor managing riparian vegetation health, Hydrological Processes, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 3474–3484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Konikow, L.F. and Bredehoeft, J.D., Modelling flow and chemical changes in an irrigated stream-aquifer system, Water Resources Research, 1974, vol. 10, pp. 546–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rosenberry, D.O. and Winter, T.C., Dynamics of water-table fluctuation in an upland between two prairie potholes wetlands in North Dakota, Journal of Hydrology, 1997, vol. 191, pp. 266–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wurster, F.C., Cooper, D.J., and Sanford, W.E., Stream/aquifer interactions at Great Sand Dunes National Monument, Colorado: influences on interdunal wetland disappearance, Journal of Hydrology, 2003, vol. 271, pp. 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Doble, R., Simmons, C., Jolly, I, and Walker, G., Spatial relationships between vegetation cover and irrigation-induced groundwater discharge on a semi-arid floodplain, Australia, Journal of Hydrology, 2006, vol. 329, nos. 1–2, pp. 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Grebenyukov, P.G., Interaction between Surface and Subsurface Waters: Case Study of a Region in Kazakhstan, Water Resources, 2001, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Overton, I.C., Jolly, I.D., Slavich, P.G.,, Lewis, M.M., and Walker, G.R., Modelling vegetation health from the interaction of saline groundwater and flooding on the Chowilla floodplain, South Australia, Australian Journal of Botany, 2006, vol. 54, pp. 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Walker, K.F. and Thoms, M.C., Environmental effects of flow regulation on the lower River Murray, Australia, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 1993, vol. 8, pp. 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kovalevskii, V.S., Principles of substantiating the functional reliability of systems based on the combined use of surface and subsurface water resources, Water Resources, 2003, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Marti, E., Fisher, S., Schade, J., and Grimm, N., Flood frequency and stream-riparian linkages in arid lands, in Streams and Groundwater, Jones, J. and Mulholland, P., Eds., 2000, San Diego, USA: Academic Press, pp. 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Harrington, G., Cook, P., and Herczeg, A., Spatial and temporal variability of ground water recharge in central Australia: A tracer approach, Ground Water, 2002, vol. 40, pp. 518–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Akeroyd, M.D., Tyeman, S.D., Walker, G.R., and Jolly, I.D., Impact of flooding on the water use of semi-arid riparian eucalypts, Journal of Hydrology, 1998, vol. 206, no. 1–2, pp. 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jolly, I.D., Walker, G.R., and Narayan, K.A., Floodwater recharge processes in the Chowilla anabranch system, South Australia, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1994, vol. 32, pp. 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Burt, T., Pinay, G., Matheson, F., Haycock, N., Butturini, A., Clement, J., Danielescu, S., Dowrick, D., Hefting, M., Hillbricht-Ilkowska, A., Maitre, V., Water table fluctuations in the riparian zone: comparative results from a pan-European experiment, Journal of Hydrology, 2002, vol. 265, pp. 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pinder, G.F., Bredehoeft, J.D., and Cooper, H.H., Determination of aquifer-diffusivity from aquifer response to fluctuations in river stage, Water Resources Research, 1969, no. 5, pp. 850–855.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Woessner, W.W., Stream and fluvial plain groundwater interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought, Ground Water, 2000, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Holland, K.L., Jolly, I.D., Overton, I.C., and Walker, G.R., Analytical model of salinity risk from groundwater discharge in semi-arid, lowland floodplains, Hydrological Processes, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 3428–3439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sauvage, S., Teissier, S., Vervier, P., Améziane, T., Garabetian, F., Delmas, F., and Caussade, B., A numerical tool to integrate bio-physical diversity of a large regulated river: hydro-biogeochemical bases; the case of the Garonne River (France), River Research Applications, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Weng, P., Sanchez-Perez, J., Sauvage, S., Vervier, P., and Giraud, F., Hydrological modelling to characterise the riparian wetland of a large alluvial river (Garonne River, France), Hydrological Processes, 2003, vol. 17, pp. 2375–2392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bauer, P., Held, R., Zimmermann, S., Linn, F., and Kinzelbach, W., Coupled flow and salinity transport modelling in semi-arid environments: the Shashe River Valley, Botswana, Journal of Hydrology, 2006, vol. 316, pp. 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lamontagne, S., Leaney, F.W., and Herczeg, A.L., Groundwater-surface water interactions in a large semi-arid floodplain: implications for salinity management, Hydrological Processes, 2005, vol. 19, pp. 3063–3080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kollet, S.J. and Maxwell, R.M., Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model, Advances in Water Resources, 2006, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 945–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Krause, S., Bronstert, A., and Zehe, E., Groundwater-surface water interactions in a North German lowland floodplain—Implications for the river discharge dynamics and riparian water balance, Journal of Hydrology, 2007, vol. 347, nos. 3–4, pp. 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Krause, S., Jacobs, J., and Bronstert, A., Modelling the impacts of land-use and drainage density on the water balance of a lowland-floodplain landscape in northeast Germany, Ecological Modelling, 2007, vol. 200, nos. 3–4, pp. 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Peyrard, D., Sauvage, S., Vervier, P., Sanchez-Perez, J.M., and Quintard, M., A coupled vertically integrated model to describe lateral exchanges between surface and subsurface in large alluvial floodplains with a fully penetrating river, Hydrological Processes, 2008, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 4257–4273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fairbanks, J., Panday, S., and Huyakorn, P., Comparisons of linked and fully coupled approaches to simulating conjunctive surface/subsurface flow and their interactions, in MODFLOW 2001 and Other Modeling, Seo, B., Poeter, E., and Zheng, C., Eds., 2001, Odysseys, Greece, pp. 356–361.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gunduz, O. and Aral, M., Simultaneous solution of coupled surface water/groundwater flow systems, in International Conference on River Basin Management, Brebbia, C.A., Ed., 2003, Gran Canaria Islands, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    van der Kwaak, J. and Loague, K., Hydrologicresponse simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model, Water Resources Research, 2001, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 999–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bear, J., Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, 1972, New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Berens, V., White, M.G., and Souter, N.J., Injection of fresh river water into a saline floodplain aquifer in an attempt to improve the condition of river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.), Hydrological Processes, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 3464–3473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Banks, E.W., Simmons, C.T., Jolly, I.D., Doble, R.C., McEwan K.L., and Herczeg, A.L., Interactions between a saline lagoon and a semi-confined aquifer on a salinized floodplain of the lower River Murray, southeastern Australia, Hydrological Processes, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 3415–3427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lenahan, M.J. and Bristow, K.L., Understanding subsurface solute distributions and salinization mechanisms in a tropical coastal floodplain groundwater system, Journal of Hydrology, 2010, vol. 390, no. 3–4, pp. 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Beven, K., Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system. Hydrological Processes, 2002, vol. 16(2), pp. 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ebel, B.A., and Loague, K., Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality. Hydrological Processes, 2006, vol. 20(13), pp. 2887–2900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Loague, K., Heppner, C.S., Mirus, B.B., Ebel, B.A., Ran, Q., Carr, A.E., BeVille, S.H., and VanderKwaak, J.E., Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: Foundation for hydroecology and hydrogeomorphology, Hydrological Processes, 2006. vol. 20(5), pp. 1231–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Loague, K. and van der Kwaak, J.E., Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool?, Hydrol. Proc., 2004, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1015–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Beven, K., and Binley, A., The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrological Processes, 1992, vol. 6(3), pp. 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Beven, K., A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, Journal of Hydrology, 2006, vol. 320, no. 1–2, pp. 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Beven, K., Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2002, vol. 458(2026), pp. 2465–2484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Beven, K., On explanatory depth and predictive power, Hydrological Processes, 2001, vol. 15(15), pp. 3069–3072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Freeze, R.A., and Harlan, R.L., Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model, Journal of Hydrology, 1969, vol. 9(3), pp. 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    van der Kwaak, J.E., Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems, 1999, University of Waterloo: Waterloo, Canada.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Qu, Y., and Duffy, C.J., A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation, Water Resources Research, 2007, vol. 43(8), pp. W08419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O’Connell, P.E., and Rasmussen, J., An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Système Hydrologique Européen, SHE, 2: Structure of a physicallybased distributed modeling system, Journal of Hydrology, 1986, vol. 87(1–2), pp. 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Camporese, M., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., and Orlandini, S., Surface-subsurface flow modeling with pathbased runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data, Water Resources Research, 2010, vol. 46(2).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hydrogeologic Inc., MODHMS software (Version 2.0) documentation, 2003, Hydrogeologic Inc.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Markstrom, S.L., Niswonger, R.G., Regan, R.S., Prudic, D.E., and Barlow, P.M., GSFLOW-Coupled groundwater and surface-water FLOW model based on the integration of the precipitation-runoff modeling system (PRMS) and the modular ground-water flow model (MODFLOW-2005), in USGS Techniques and Methods, 6-D12008, USGS: Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Leavesley, G.H., Restrepo, P.J., Markstrom, S.L., Dixon, M., and Stannard, L.G., The modular modeling system (MMS): User’s manual, in USGS Open-File Report 96-1511996, USGS: Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ross, M.A., Tara, P.D., Geurink, J.S., and Stewart, M.T., FIPR hydrologic model users’ manual and technical documentation, in CMHAS Water Resources Report FIPR.97.031997, University of South Florida: Tampa.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sophocleous, M.S., and Perkins, P., Methodology and application of combined watershed and ground-water models in Kansas, Journal of Hydrology, 2000, vol. 236, no. 3–4. pp. 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Sudicky, E., Jones, J., Park, Y.-J., Brookfield, A., and Colautti, D., Simulating complex flow and transport dynamics in an integrated surface-subsurface modeling framework, Geosciences Journal, 2008, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Brown, D.L., An analysis of transient flow in upland watersheds: interactions between structure and process, 1995, University of California: Berkeley, p. 242.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Jones, J.P., Sudicky, E.A., and McLaren, R.G., Application of a fully-integrated surface-subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: A case study, Water Resources Research, 2008, vol. 44, no. 3.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Loague, K., Heppner, C., Abrams, R., Carr, A., VanderKwaak, J. and Ebel, B., Further testing of the integrated hydrology model (InHM): event-based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma, Hydrological Processes, 2005, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1373–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Loague, K., and van der Kwaak, J.E., Simulating hydrological response for the R-5 catchment: Comparison of two models and the impact of the roads, Hydrological Processes, 2002, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1015–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Jones, J.P., Sudicky, E.A., Brookfield, A.E., and Park, Y.J., An assessment of the tracer-based approach to quantifying groundwater contributions to streamflow, Water Resources Research, 2006, vol. 42, no. 2.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sulis, M., Paniconi, C., Rivard, C., Harvey, R., and Chaumont, D., Assessment of climate change impacts at the catchment scale with a detailed hydrological model of surface-subsurface interactions and comparison with a land surface model, Water Resources Research, 2011, vol. 47, no. 1.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Cey, E., Rudolph, D., and Therrien, R., Simulation of groundwater recharge dynamics in partially saturated fractured soils incorporating spatially variable fracture apertures, Water Resources Research, 2006, vol. 42, no. 9.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Brookfield, A.E., Sudicky, E.A.,. Park, Y.J, and Conant, B., Jr., Thermal transport modelling in a fully integrated surface/subsurface framework, Hydrological Processes, 2009, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 2150–2164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Raymond, J., Therrien, R., and Gosselin, L., Borehole temperature evolution during thermal response tests, Geothermics, 2011, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Bonton, A., Rouleau, A., Bouchard, C., and Rodriguez, M.J., Nitrate transport modeling to evaluate source water protection scenarios for a municipal well in an agricultural area, Agricultural Systems, 2011, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Graf, T., and Boufadel, M.C., Effect of viscosity, capillarity and grid spacing on thermal variable-density flow, Journal of Hydrology, 2011, vol. 400, no. 1–2, pp. 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Li, Q., Unger, A.J.A., Sudicky, E.A., Kassenaar, D., Wexler, E.J., and Shikaze, S., Simulating the multiseasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model, Journal of Hydrology, 2008, vol. 357, no. 3–4, pp. 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Calderhead, A.I., Therrien, R., Rivera, A., Martel, R., and Garfias, J., Simulating pumping-induced regional land subsidence with the use of InSAR and field data in the Toluca Valley, Mexico, Advances in Water Resources, 2011, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Bunn, M.I., Rudolph, D.L., Endres, A.L., and Jones, J.P., Field observation of the response to pumping and recovery in the water table region of an unconfined aquifer, Journal of Hydrology, 2011, vol. 403, no. 3–4, pp. 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Weatherill, D., Graf, T., Simmons, C.T., Cook, P.G., Therrien, R., and Reynolds, D.A., Discretizing the fracture-matrix interface to simulate solute transport, Ground Water, 2008, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 606–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Graf, T., and Therrien, R., A test case for the simulation of three-dimensional variable-density flow and solute transport in discretely-fractured porous media, Advances in Water Resources, 2008. vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1352–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Rosenbom, A.E., Therrien, R., Refsgaard, J.C., Jensen, K.H., Ernstsen, V., and Klint, K.E.S., Numerical analysis of water and solute transport in variably-saturated fractured clayey till, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2009, vol. 104, no. 1–4, pp. 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Goderniaux, P., Brouyère, S., Fowler, H.J., Blenkinsop, S., Therrien, R., Orban, P., and Dassargues, A., Large scale surface-subsurface hydrological model to assess climate change impacts on groundwater reserves, Journal of Hydrology, 2009, vol. 373, no. 1–2, pp. 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Brunner, P., Simmons, C.T., and Cook, P.G., Spatial and temporal aspects of the transition from connection to disconnection between rivers, lakes and groundwater, Journal of Hydrology, 2009, vol. 376, no. 1–2, pp. 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Partington, D., Brunner, P., Simmons, C.T., Therrien, R., Werner, A.D., Dandy, G.C., and Maier, H.R., A hydraulic mixing-cell method to quantify the groundwater component of streamflow within spatially distributed fully integrated surface water-groundwater flow models, Environmental Modelling and Software, 2011, vol. 26, no. 7. pp. 886–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    McCallum, J.L., Cook, P.G., Brunner, P., and Berhane, D., Solute dynamics during bank storage flows and implications for chemical base flow separation, Water Resources Research, 2010, vol. 46, no. 7.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Said, A., Stevens, D.K., and Sehlke, G., Estimating water budget in a regional aquifer using HSPF-MOD-FLOW integrated model, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2005, vol. 41, no.1, pp. 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Halford, K.J., and Mayer, G.C., Problems associated with estimating ground water discharge and recharge from stream-discharge records, Ground Water, 2000, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Liang, D., Falconer, R., and Lin, B., Coupling surface and subsurface flow in a depth averaged flood wave model, Journal of Hydrology, 2007, vol. 337, pp. 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    ICE, Learning to live with rivers, 2001, London, UK: Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE).Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Winter, T.C., Harvey, J.W., Lehn Franke, O. and Alley, W.M., Groundwater and surface water a single resource, in Circular 11391998, US Geological Survey, US Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Panday, S. and Huyakorn, P., A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow, Advances in Water Resources, 2004, vol. 27, pp. 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Gunduz, O. and Aral, M., River networks and groundwater flow: simultaneous solution of a coupled System, Journal of Hydrology, 2005, vol. 301, no. 216-234.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Hall, F.R., and Moench, A.F., Application of the convolution equation to stream-aquifer relationships, Water Resour. Res., 1972, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 487–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Glover, R.E., Transient Groundwater Hydraulics, 1974.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Gill, M.A., Bank storage characteristics of a finite aquifer due to sudden rise and fall of river level, Journal of Hydrology, 1985, vol. 76, nos. 1–2, pp. 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Perkins, S.P. and Koussis, A.D., Stream-aquifer interaction model with diffusive wave routing, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1996, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Cooper, H.H.J. and Rorabaugh, M.I., Ground-water movements and bank storage due to flood stages in surface streams, in Water Supply Paper 1536-J, US Geological survey, 1963.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Pinder, G.F. and Sauer, S.P., Numerical simulation of flood wave modification due to bank storage effects, Water Resources Research, 1971, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Freeze, R.A., Role of subsurface flow I generating surface runoff: 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow, Water Resources Research, 1972, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Morita, M. and Yen, B.C., Modelling of conjunctive two-dimensional surface—three—dimensional subsurface flows, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, vol. 128, pp. 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Weatherill, D., Simmons, C.T., Voss, C.I., and Robinson, N.I., Testing density-dependent groundwater models: Two-dimensional steady state unstable convection in infinite, finite and inclined porous layers, Advances in Water Resources, 2004, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Bobba, A.G., Singh, V.P., and Bengtsson, L., Application of environmental models to different hydrological systems, Ecological Modelling, 2000, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 15–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Gardner, L.R. and Wilson, A.M., Comparison of four numerical models for simulating seepage from salt marsh sediments, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2006, vol. 69, nos. 3–4, pp. 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    McKenzie, J.M., Voss, C.I., and Siegel, D.I., Groundwater flow with energy transport and water-ice phase change: Numerical simulations, benchmarks, and application to freezing in peat bogs, Advances in Water Resources, 2007, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 966–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Simmons, C.T. and Narayan, K.A., Modelling density-dependent flow and solute transport at the Lake Tutchewop saline disposal complex, Victoria, Journal of Hydrology, 1998, vol. 206, nos. 3–4, pp. 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    McDonald, M.G. and Harbaugh, A.W., A modular three dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model, in U.S. Geological Survey Technique of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chap. A1, USGS: Reston, Virginia, 1988.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Prudic, D.E., Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream-aquifer relations using a modular, finite difference, ground-water flow model, in OpenFile Report 88-729, USGS: Reston, Virginia, 1989.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Prudic, D.E., Konikow, L.F., and Banta, E.R., A new streamflow-routing (SFR1) package to simulate streamaquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000, in Open-File Report 2004-1042, USGS: Reston, Virginia, 2004.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Niswonger, R.G. and Prudic, D.E., Documentation of the streamflow-routing (SFR2) package to include unsaturated flow beneath streams—a modification to SFR1, in Techniques and Methods, Book 6,Chap. 13, Section A, USGS: Reston, Virginia, 2005.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Swain, E.D. and Wexler, E.J., A coupled surfacewater and ground-water flow model (MODBRANCH) for simulation of stream-aquifer interaction, in USGS Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chap. A6, USGS: Reston, Virginia (1996).Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Wilcox, L.E., Bowman, R.S., and Shafike, N.G., Evaluation of Rio Grande management alternatives using a surfacewater/ground-water model, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2007, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Jobson, H.E. and Harbaugh, A.W., Modifications to the diffusion analogy surface-water flow model (DAFLOW) for coupling to the modular finite-difference groundwater flow model (MODFLOW), in USGS Open File Report 99-217, USGS: Reston, Virginia, 1999.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Singh, V. and Bhallamudi, S.M., Complete hydrodynamic borderstrip irrigation model, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1996, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Fiedler, F.R. and Ramirez, J.A., A numerical method for simulating discontinuous shallow flow over an infiltrating surface, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Sparks, T., Integrated modelling of 2-D surface water and groundwater flow with contaminant transport, in 31st IAHR congress, Seoul., 2005, pp. 6465–6476.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Langevin, C., Swain, E.D., and Wolfert, M., Simulation of integrated surface water-groundwater flow and salinity for a coastal wetland and adjacent estuary, Journal of Hydrology, 2005, vol. 314, pp. 212–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Krause, S. and Bronstert, A., Water balance simulations and groundwater-surface water interactions in a mesoscale lowland river catchment, Hydrological Processes, 2007, vol. 21, pp. 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Winter, T.C., Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems, Hydrogeoly Journal, 1999, vol. 7, pp. 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Schubert, J., Hydraulic aspects of riverbank filtration-field studies, Journal of Hydrology, 2002, vol. 266, pp. 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Meire, D., De Doncker, L., Declercq, F., Buis, K., Troch, P., and Verhoeven, R., Modelling river-floodplain interaction during flood propagation, Natural Hazards, 2010, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Huang, J.C., Mitsch, W.J., and Johnson, D.L., Estimating biogeochemical and biotic interactions between a stream channel and a created riparian wetland: A medium-scale physical model, Ecological Engineering, 2011, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1035–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Massoudieh, A., Bombardelli, F.A., and Ginn, T.R., A biogeochemical model of contaminant fate and transport in river waters and sediments, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2010, vol. 112, nos. 1–4, pp. 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Baskaran, S., Ransley, T., Brodie, R.S., and Baker, P., Investigating groundwater-river interactions using environmental tracers, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2009, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Dousson, C., Poitevin, G., Ledoux, E., and Detay, M., River bank filtration: modelling of the changes in water chemistry with emphasis on nitrogen species, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1997, vol. 25, pp. 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Holzbecher, E., Modeling Density-driven Flow in Porous Media, Berlin: Springer, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Simmons, C.T., Variable density groundwater flow: from current changes to future possibilities, Hydrogeoly Journal, 2005, vol. 13, pp. 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Massmann, G., Simmons, C.T., Love, A., Ward, J., and Smith, A., On variable density surface water-groundwater interaction: A theoretical analysis of mixed convection in a stably-stratified fresh surface water-saline groundwater discharge zone, Journal of Hydrology, 2006, vol. 326, pp. 390–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Diersch, H.J.G., Prochnow, D., and Thiele, M., Finite-element analysis of dispersion-affected saltwater upcoming below a pumping well, Applied Mathematical Models, 1984, vol. 8, pp. 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Reilly, T.E. and Goodmann, A.S., Analysis of saltwater upcoming beneath a pumping well, Journal of Hydrology, 1987, vol. 89, pp. 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Cheng, J.M. and Chen, C.X., Three-dimensional modeling of density dependent salt water intrusion in multilayered coastal aquifers in the Jahe River Basin, Shandong Province, China, Ground Water, 2001, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Huyakorn, P.S., Anderson, P.F., Mercer, J.W., and White, J.H.O., Saltwater intrusion in aquifers: development and testing of a three-dimensional finite element model, Water Resources Research, 1987, vol. 23, pp. 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Volker, R.E. and Rushton, K.R., An assessment of the importance of some parameters for seawater intrusion and a comparison of dispersive and sharp-interface modelling approaches, Journal of Hydrology, 1982, vol. 56, pp. 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Khublaryan, M., Frolov, A., and Yushmanov, I., Seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers, Water Resources, 2008, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Kolditz, O., Ratke, R., Diersch, H.-J.G., and Zielke, W., Coupled groundwater flow and transport: 1 Verification of variable-density flow and transport models, Advances in Water Resources, 1998, vol. 211, pp. 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Oldenburg, C.M. and Pruess, K., Dispersive transport dynamics in a strongly coupled groundwater-brine flow system, Water Resources Research, 1995, vol. 31, pp. 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Simmons, C.T. and Narayan, K., Mixed convection processes below a saline disposal basin, Journal of Hydrology, 1997, vol. 194, pp. 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Simmons, C.T., Narayan, K.A., Woods, J.A., and Herzceg, A.L., Groundwater flow and solute transport at the Mourguong salinewater disposal basin, southeastern Australia, Hydrogeoly Journal, 2002, vol. 10, pp. 278–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Wooding, R.A., Tyler, S.W., White, I., and Anderson, P.A., Convection in groundwater below an evaporating salt lake. 2. Evolution of fingers or plumes, Water Resources Research, 1997, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1219–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Liu, H.H. and Dane, J.H., A criterion for gravitational instability in miscible dense plumes, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1996, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Oostrom, M., Hayworth, J.S., Dane, J.H., and Güven, O., Behaviour of dense aqueous leachate plumes in homogeneous porous media, Water Resources Research, 1992, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2123–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Schincariol, R.A., Schwartz, F.W., and Mendoza, C.A., Instabilities in variable density flows: stability and sensitivity analyses for homogeneous and heterogeneous media, Water Resources Research, 1997, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Rushton, K.R. and Tomlinson, L.M., Possible mechanisms for leakage between aquifers and rivers, Journal of Hydrology, 1979, vol. 40, pp. 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Sophocleus, M., Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of science, Hydrogeoly Journal, 2002, vol. 10, pp. 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Lusczynski, N., Head and flow of ground water of variable density, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1961, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 4247–4256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Ghassemi, F., Jakeman, A.J., and Thomas, G.A., Ground-water modelling for salinity management: An Australian case study, Ground Water, 1989, vol. 27, pp. 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Herbert, A.W., Jackson, C.P., and Lever, D.A., Coupled groundwater flow and solute transport with fluid density strongly dependent upon concentration, Water Resources Research, 1988, vol. 24, pp. 1781–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Oostrom, M., et al., Behaviour of dense aqueous phase leachate plumes in homogeneous porous media, Water Resources Research, 1992, vol. 28, pp. 2123–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Voss, C.I., SUTRA: A finite-element simulation model for saturated-unsaturated fluid-density-dependent groundwater flow with energy transport or chemically reactive species solute transport, in Report 84-4369, US Geology, Survey and Water Resources Investigations: Reston, USA, 1984.Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    Misut, P.E. and Voss, C.I., Simulation of seawater intrusion resulting from proposed expanded pumpage in New York City, USA, in Developments in Water Science, Cass, T.M. and George, F.P., Eds., Elsevier, 2004, pp. 1595–1606.Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Charlesworth, A.T., Narayan, K.A., and Simmons, C.T., Modelling salt accession within the Chowilla Ananbranch and possible mitigation schemes, in Divisional Report 94/7, CSIRO, Division of Water Resources, 1994.Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    Oswald, S.E. and Kinzelbach, W., Three-dimensional physical benchmark experiments to test variable-density flow models, Journal of Hydrology, 2004, vol. 290, nos. 1–2, pp. 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Segol, G., Classic Groundwater Simulations: Proving and Improving Numerical Models, 1994.Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    The International HYDROCOIN Project, Level 1: Code verification, SKI and OECD/NEA, OECD/NEA, Paris, 1991, p. 336.Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Elder, J.W., Transient convection in a porous medium, J. Fluid Mech., 1967, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Lapwood, E.R., Convection of a fluid in a porous medium, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 1948, vol. 44, pp. 508–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Horton, C.W. and Rogers, F.T., Jr, Convection currents in a porous medium, Journal of Applied Physics, 1945, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 367–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Shikaze, S., Sudicky, E., and Schwartz, F., Densitydependent solute transport in discretely-fractured geologic media: is prediction possible? Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1998, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Graf, T. and Therrien, R., Variable-density groundwater flow and solute transport in porous media containing nonuniform discrete fractures, Advances in Water Resources, 2005, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1351–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Therrien, R. and Sudicky, E.A., Three-dimensional analysis of variably-saturated flow and solute transport in discretely-fractured porous media, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1996, vol. 23, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Graf, T. and Degener, L., Grid convergence of variable-density flow simulations in discretely-fractured porous media, Advances in Water Resources, 2011, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 760–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Bornman, T.G., Adams, J.B., and Bate, G.C., The influence of floodplain geohydrology on the distribution of Sarcocornia pillansii in the Olifants Estuary on the West Coast, South Africa, Journal of Arid Environments, 2004, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 603–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Capon, S.J., Flood variability and spatial variation in plant community composition and structure on a large arid floodplain, Journal of Arid Environments, 2005, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Alexander, H.D. and Dunton, K.H., Treated wastewater effluent as an alternative freshwater source in a hypersaline salt marsh: Impacts on salinity, inorganic nitrogen, and emergent vegetation, Journal of Coastal Research, 2006, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Mensforth, L., Water use strategy of Melaleuca halmaturorum in a saline swamp/by Lisa Jane Mensforth, in Dept. of Botany, The University of Adelaide: Adelaide, 1997.Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    Slavich, P.G., Walker, G.R., Jolly, I.D., Hatton, T.J., and Dawes, W.R., Dynamics of Eucalyptus largiflorens growth and water use in response to modified watertable and flooding regimes on a saline floodplain, Agricultural Water Management, 1999, vol. 39, nos. 2–3, pp. 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Jolly, I.D., Walker, G.R., and Thorburn, P.J., Salt accumulation in semi-arid floodplain soils with implications for forest health, Journal of Hydrology, 1993, vol. 150, nos. 2–4, pp. 589–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Alexander, H.D. and Dunton, K.H., Freshwater inundation effects on emergent vegetation of a hypersaline salt marsh, Estuaries, 2002, vol. 25, no. 6 B, pp. 1426–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Callaway, R.M., Jones, S., Ferren, W.R. Jr, and Parikh, A., Ecology of a mediterranean-climate estuarine wetland at Carpinteria, California; plant distributions and soil salinity in the upper marsh, Canadian Journal of Botany, 1990, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1139–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Noe, G.B. and Zedler, J.B., Variable rainfall limits the germination of upper intertidal marsh plants in southern California, Estuaries, 2001, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Zedler, J.B. and West, J.M., Declining diversity in natural and restored salt marshes: A 30-year study of Tijuana Estuary, Restoration Ecology, 2008, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Forbes, M.G. and Dunton, K.H., Response of a subtropical estuarine marsh to local climatic change in the southwestern gulf of Mexico, Estuaries and Coasts, 2006, vol. 29, no. 6 B, pp. 1242–1254.Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Zedler, J.B., Covin, J., Nordby, C., Williams, P., and Boland, J., Catastrophic events reveal the dynamic nature of salt-marsh vegetation in Southern California, Estuaries, 1986, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Jolly, I.D., McEwan, K.L., and Holland, K.L., A review of groundwater-surface water interactions in arid/semi-arid wetlands and the consequences of salinity for wetland ecology, Ecohydrology, 2008, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Bornman, T.G. and Adams, J.B., Response of a hypersaline salt marsh to a large flood and rainfall event along the west coast of southern Africa, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2010, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 378–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Townley, L. and Trefry, M., Surface water-groundwater interaction near shallow circular lakes: Flow geometry in three dimensions, Water Resources Research, 2000, vol. 36, pp. 935–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Nield, S., Townley, L., and Barr, A., A framework for quantitative analysis of surface water-groundwater interaction: Flow geometry in a vertical section, Water Resources Research, 1994, vol. 30, pp. 2461–2475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Smith, A. and Townley, L., Influence of regional setting on the interaction between shallow lakes and aquifers, Water Resources Research, 2002, vol. 38, p. 1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Townley, L. and Davidson, M., Definition of a capture zone for shallow water table lakes, Journal of Hydrology, 1988, vol. 104, pp. 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Frei, S., Lischeid, G., and Fleckenstein, J.H., Effects of micro-topography on surface-subsurface exchange and runoff generation in a virtual riparian wetland—A modeling study, Advances in Water Resources, 2010, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1388–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Dunne, T., Zhang, W., and Aubry, B.F., Effects of rainfall, vegetation, and microtopography on infiltration and runoff, Water Resources Research, 1991, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2271–2285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Kværner, J. and Kløve, B., Generation and regulation of summer runoff in a boreal flat fen, Journal of Hydrology, 2008, vol. 360, nos. 1–4, pp. 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Antoine, M., Javaux, M., and Bielders, C., What indicators can capture runoff-relevant connectivity properties of the micro-topography at the plot scale?, Advances in Water Resources, 2009, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1297–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Fiedler, F.R. and Ramirez, J.A., A numerical method for simulating discontinuous shallow flow over an infiltrating surface, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2000, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Esteves, M., Faucher, X., Galle, S., and Vauclin, M., Overland flow and infiltration modelling for small plots during unsteady rain: Numerical results versus observed values, Journal of Hydrology, 2000, vol. 228, nos. 3–4, pp. 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Devito, K.J. and Hill, A.R., Sulphate dynamics in relation to groundwater-surface water interactions in headwater wetlands of the southern Canadian Shield, Hydrological Processes, 1997, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Gibson, J.J., Price, J.S., Aravena, R., Fitzgerald, D.F., and Maloney, D., Runoff generation in a hypermaritime bog-forest upland, Hydrological Processes, 2000, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 2711–2730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Qu, Y. and Duffy, C.J., A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation, Water Resources Research, 2007, vol. 43, no. 8.Google Scholar
  214. 214.
    Peter, A., A plea for the restoration of Alpine rivers: Basic principles derived from the “Rhone-Thur” Case Study, in Alpine Waters, Bundi, U., Ed., Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010, pp. 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Hoehn, E. and Scholtis, A., Exchange between a river and groundwater, assessed with hydrochemical data, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2011, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 983–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Lautz, L.K. and Fanelli, R.M., Seasonal biogeochemical hotspots in the streambed around restoration structures, Biogeochemistry, 2008, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Zobrist, J., Water chemistry of Swiss Alpine rivers, in Alpine Waters, Bundi, U., Ed., Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010, pp. 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SA Water Centre for Water Management and Reuse, School Natural and Built EnvironmentsUniversity of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia
  2. 2.College of AgricultureShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations