Abstract
For a finite point set E ⊂ ℝd and a connected graph G on k + 1 vertices, we define a G-framework to be a collection of k + 1 points in E such that the distance between a pair of points is specified if the corresponding vertices of G are connected by an edge. We consider two frameworks the same if the specified edge-distances are the same. We find tight bounds on such distinct-distance drawings for rigid graphs in the plane, deploying the celebrated result of Guth and Katz. We introduce a congruence relation on a wider set of graphs, which behaves nicely in both the real-discrete and continuous settings. We provide a sharp bound on the number of such congruence classes. We then make a conjecture that the tight bound on rigid graphs should apply to all graphs. This appears to be a hard problem even in the case of the nonrigid 2-chain. However, we provide evidence to support the conjecture by demonstrating that if the Erd˝os pinned-distance conjecture holds in dimension d, then the result for all graphs in dimension d follows.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. Aronov, J. Pach, M. Sharir, and G. Tardos, “Distinct distances in three and higher dimensions,” Comb. Probab. Comput. 13 (3), 283–293 (2004).
L. Asimow and B. Roth, “The rigidity of graphs,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 245, 279–289 (1978).
C. Borcea and I. Streinu, “The number of embeddings of minimally rigid graphs,” Discrete Comput. Geom. 31 (2), 287–303 (2004).
N. Chatzikonstantinou, A. Iosevich, S. Mkrtchyan, and J. Pakianathan, “Rigidity, graphs and Hausdorff dimension,” arXiv: 1708.05919 [math.CA].
F. R. K. Chung, “The number of different distances determined by n points in the plane,” J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 36 (3), 342–354 (1984).
F. R. K. Chung, E. Szemerédi, and W. T. Trotter, “The number of different distances determined by a set of points in the Euclidean plane,” Discrete Comput. Geom. 7 (1), 1–11 (1992).
K. L. Clarkson, H. Edelsbrunner, L. J. Guibas, M. Sharir, and E. Welzl, “Combinatorial complexity bounds for arrangements of curves and spheres,” Discrete Comput. Geom. 5 (2), 99–160 (1990).
P. Erdős, “On sets of distances of n points,” Am. Math. Mon. 53, 248–250 (1946).
J. Graver, B. Servatius, and H. Servatius, Combinatorial Rigidity (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993), Grad. Stud. Math. 2.
L. Guth and N. H. Katz, “On the Erdős distinct distances problem in the plane,” Ann. Math., Ser. 2, 181 (1), 155–190 (2015).
N. H. Katz and G. Tardos, “A new entropy inequality for the Erdős distance problem,” in Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004), Contemp. Math. 342, pp. 119–126.
L. Moser, “On the different distances determined by n points,” Am. Math. Mon. 59 (2), 85–91 (1952).
B. Roth, “Rigid and flexible frameworks,” Am. Math. Mon. 88 (1), 6–21 (1981).
J. Solymosi and Cs. D. Tóth, “Distinct distances in the plane,” Discrete Comput. Geom. 25 (4), 629–634 (2001).
J. Solymosi and V. Vu, “Distinct distances in high dimensional homogeneous sets,” in Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004), Contemp. Math. 342, pp. 259–268.
J. Solymosi and V. H. Vu, “Near optimal bounds for the Erdős distinct distances problem in high dimensions,” Combinatorica 28 (1), 113–125 (2008).
L. A. Székely, “Crossing numbers and hard Erdős problems in discrete geometry,” Comb. Probab. Comput. 6 (3), 353–358 (1997).
G. Tardos, “On distinct sums and distinct distances,” Adv. Math. 180 (1), 275–289 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Published in Russian in Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V.A. Steklova, 2018, Vol. 303, pp. 142–154.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iosevich, A., Passant, J. Finite Point Configurations in the Plane, Rigidity and Erdős Problems. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 303, 129–139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543818080114
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543818080114