On holomorphic homogeneity of real hypersurfaces of general position in ℂ3



Holomorphically homogeneous strictly pseudoconvex real hypersurfaces of threedimensional complex spaces are studied within the coefficient approach. It is shown that the family of surfaces for which a fourth-degree polynomial in the Moser normal equation has a general form is described by at most 13 real parameters. Examples related to the normal equations of tubes over affine homogeneous bases are given which confirm the results of accompanying computer calculations.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    I. V. Arzhantsev, Gröbner Bases and Systems of Algebraic Equations: Summer School “Modern Mathematics,” Dubna, July 2002 (MTsNMO, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. V. Atanov and A. V. Loboda, “Normal equations of homogeneous surfaces with conditions on individual coefficients,” in Contemporary Methods in Theory of Functions and Adjacent Problems: Proc. Int. Conf. “Voronezh Winter Mathematical School,” Voronezh, 2017 (Izd. Dom VGU, Voronezh, 2017), pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. K. Beloshapka and I. G. Kossovskiy, “Homogeneous hypersurfaces in C3, associated with a model CR-cubic,” J. Geom. Anal. 20 (3), 538–564 (2010).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. A. Boldyreva and A. V. Loboda, “On the coefficient approach to affine homogeneity,” Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ., Ser.: Fiz., Mat., No. 1, 109–113 (2006).MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Cartan, “Sur la géométrie pseudo-conforme des hypersurfaces de l’espace de deux variables complexes,” Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., Ser. 4, 11, 17–90 (1932).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. S. Chern and J. K. Moser, “Real hypersurfaces in complex manifolds,” Acta Math. 133, 219–271 (1974).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Doubrov, B. Komrakov, and M. Rabinovich, “Homogeneous surfaces in the three-dimensional affine geometry,” in Geometry and Topology of Submanifolds. VIII, Ed. by F. Dillen et al. (World Sci., Singapore, 1996), pp. 168–178.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Eastwood and V. Ezhov, “On affine normal forms and a classification of homogeneous surfaces in affine three-space,” Geom. Dedicata 77 (1), 11–69 (1999).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. V. Ezhov, A. V. Loboda, and G. Schmalz, “Canonical form of the fourth degree homogeneous part in a normal equation of a real hypersurface in C3,” Mat. Zametki 66 (4), 624–626 (1999) [Math. Notes 66, 513–515 (1999)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Fels and W. Kaup, “Classification of Levi degenerate homogeneous CR-manifolds in dimension 5,” Acta Math. 201 (1), 1–82 (2008).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. V. Isaev, “On homogeneous hypersurfaces in C3,” arxiv: 1610.07270 [math.CV].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Kolar, I. Kossovskiy, and D. Zaitsev, “Normal forms in Cauchy–Riemann geometry,” in Analysis and Geometry in Several Complex Variables: Proc. Workshop, Doha, 2015 (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2017), Contemp. Math. 681, pp. 153–177; arxiv: 1606.08091 [math.CV].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. V. Loboda, “Local description of homogeneous real hypersurfaces of the two-dimensional complex space in terms of their normal equations,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozh. 34 (2), 33–42 (2000) [Funct. Anal. Appl. 34, 106–113 (2000)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Loboda, “Homogeneous strictly pseudoconvex hypersurfaces in C3 with two-dimensional isotropy groups,” Mat. Sb. 192 (12), 3–24 (2001) [Sb. Math. 192, 1741–1761 (2001)].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Loboda, “Homogeneous real hypersurfaces in C3 with two-dimensional isotropy groups,” Tr. Mat. Inst. im. V.A. Steklova, Ross. Akad. Nauk 235, 114–142 (2001) [Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 235, 107–135 (2001)].MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. V. Loboda, “Determination of a homogeneous strictly pseudoconvex surface from the coefficients of its normal equation,” Mat. Zametki 73 (3), 453–456 (2003) [Math. Notes 73, 419–423 (2003)].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. V. Loboda and V. I. Sukovykh, “Use of computer algorithms in the problem of coefficient description of homogeneous surfaces,” Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ., Ser. Sist. Anal. Inf. Tekhnol., No. 1, 14–22 (2015).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Morimoto and T. Nagano, “On pseudo-conformal transformations of hypersurfaces,” J. Math. Soc. Japan 15 (3), 289–300 (1963).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Sabzevari, A. Hashemi, B. M. -Alizadeh, and J. Merker, “Applications of differential algebra for computing Lie algebras of infinitesimal CR-automorphisms,” Sci. China, Math. 57 (9), 1811–1834 (2014); arxiv: 1212.3070 [math.RA].MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Smale, “Mathematical problems for the next century,” in Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives (Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000), pp. 271–294.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    V. I. Sukovykh, “Formulas for lower-order Taylor coefficients of homogeneous surfaces,” Vestn. Volgogr. Gos. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Fiz., No. 5, 104–123 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Voronezh State UniversityVoronezhRussia
  2. 2.Voronezh State Technical UniversityVoronezhRussia

Personalised recommendations