Skip to main content
Log in

Threshold optimization in observability inequality for the wave equation with homogeneous Robin-type boundary condition

  • Published:
Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the wave equation with variable coefficients, problems with one-side boundary controls of three basic types and a boundary condition of the third kind at the uncontrolled end are considered. For dual problems with one-side boundary observations in the classes of strong generalized solutions, new constructive observability inequalities are obtained that are superior to the earlier known ones in two respects. First, inequalities with an optimal value of the controllability-observability threshold are derived, and second, the value of the final evaluation constant is bounded away from zero on time intervals whose length is close to the critical length. This opens up a possibility of constructing stable approximate solutions to the indicated classes of dual control and observation problems on time intervals not only of an arbitrary supercritical but also of precisely critical length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. A. Nikitin, “Optimal Boundary Control of String Vibrations by a Force under Elastic Fixing,” Diff. Uravn. 47(12), 1773–1782 (2011) [Diff. Eqns. 47, 1796–1805 (2011)].

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. M. Potapov, “Observability of Irregular Solutions to the Third Boundary Value Problem for the Wave Equation with Variable Coefficients,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 414(6), 738–742 (2007) [Dokl. Math. 75 (3), 442-446 (2007)].

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. M. Potapov, “Finite-Difference Approximation of Dirichlet Observation Problems for Weak Solutions to the Wave Equation Subject to Robin Boundary Conditions,” Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 47(8), 1323–1339 (2007) [Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 47, 1268–1284 (2007)].

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. F. P. Vasil’ev, M. A. Kurzhanskii, M. M. Potapov, and A. V. Razgulin, Approximate Solution of Dual Control and Observation Problems (Maks Press, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. M. Potapov, “A Stable Method for Solving Linear Equations with Nonuniformly Perturbed Operator,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 365(5), 596–598 (1999) [Dokl. Math. 59 (2), 286–288 (1999)].

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Komornik, Exact Controllability and Stabilization: The Multiplier Method (Wiley, Chichester; Masson, Paris, 1994).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, Control Theory for Partial Differential Equations: Continuous and Approximation Theories, II: Abstract Hyperbolic-like Systems over a Finite Time Horizon (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000), Encycl. Math. Appl. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Zuazua, “Propagation, Observation, and Control of Waves Approximated by Finite Difference Methods,” SIAM Rev. 47(2), 197–243 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Zuazua, “Controllability and Observability of Partial Differential Equations: Some Results and Open Problems,” in Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations, Ed. by C. M. Dafermos and E. Feireisl (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), Vol. 3, Ch. 7, pp. 527–621.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. L. F. Ho, “Exact Controllability of the One-Dimensional Wave Equation with Locally Distributed Control,” SIAM J. Control Optim. 28(3), 733–748 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. V. A. Il’in, “Two-Endpoint Boundary Control of Vibrations Described by a Finite-Energy Generalized Solution of the Wave Equation,” Diff. Uravn. 36(11), 1513–1528 (2000) [Diff. Eqns. 36, 1659–1675 (2000)].

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. A. Il’in, “Boundary Control of Oscillations at One Endpoint with the Other Endpoint Fixed in Terms of a Finite-Energy Generalized Solution of the Wave Equation,” Diff. Uravn. 36(12), 1670–1686 (2000) [Diff. Eqns. 36, 1832–1849 (2000)].

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Lasiecka, J.-L. Lions, and R. Triggiani, “Nonhomogeneous Boundary Value Problems for Second Order Hyperbolic Operators,” J. Math. Pures Appl. 65, 149–192 (1986).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. N. Tikhonov and A. A. Samarskii, Equations of Mathematical Physics (Nauka, Moscow, 1977; Dover, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. M. Alekseev, V. M. Tikhomirov, and S. V. Fomin, Optimal Control (Nauka, Moscow, 1979; Consultants Bureau, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Potapov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.M. Potapov, A.A. Dryazhenkov, 2012, published in Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V.A. Steklova, 2012, Vol. 277, pp. 215–229.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potapov, M.M., Dryazhenkov, A.A. Threshold optimization in observability inequality for the wave equation with homogeneous Robin-type boundary condition. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 277, 206–220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543812040153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0081543812040153

Keywords

Navigation