Abstract
A variant of the higher covariant derivative regularization is used for calculation of a two-loop β-function for the general renormalizable N = 1 supersymmetric theory. It is shown that the β-function is given by integrals of total derivatives. Partially this can be explained by substituting solutions of Slavnov-Taylor identities into the Schwinger-Dyson equations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. t’ Hooft and M. Veltman, “Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B 44, 189–213 (1972).
W. Siegel, “Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularization via Dimensional Reduction,” Phys. Lett. B 84, 193–196 (1979).
L. V. Avdeev and O. V. Tarasov, “The Three-Loop Beta-Function in the N = 1, 2, 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 112, 356–358 (1982).
L. F. Abbott, M. T. Grisaru, and D. Zanon, “Infrared Divergences and a Non-local Gauge for Superspace Yang-Mills Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 244, 454–468 (1984).
A. Parkes and P. West, “Finiteness in Rigid Supersymmetric Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 138, 99–104 (1984).
I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and C. G. North, “N = 1 Supersymmetry and the Three-Loop Gauge β-Function,” Phys. Lett. B 386, 138–140 (1996).
I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and C. G. North, “N = 1 Supersymmetry and the Three-Loop Anomalous Dimension for the Chiral Superfield,” Nucl. Phys. B 473, 308–322 (1996).
I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and C. G. North, “Scheme Dependence and the NSVZ β-Function,” Nucl. Phys. B 486, 479–499 (1997).
I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and A. Pickering, “The Connection between the DRED and NSVZ Renormalisation Schemes,” Phys. Lett. B 435, 61–66 (1998).
W. Siegel, “Inconsistency of Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularization,” Phys. Lett. B 94, 37–40 (1980).
D. Stöckinger, “Regularization by Dimensional Reduction: Consistency, Quantum Action Principle, and Supersymmetry,” J. High Energy Phys., No. 3, 076 (2005).
W. Hollik and D. Stöckinger, “MSSM Higgs-Boson Mass Predictions and Two-Loop Non-supersymmetric Counterterms,” Phys. Lett. B 634, 63–68 (2006).
A. Signer and D. Stöckinger, “Factorization and Regularization by Dimensional Reduction,” Phys. Lett. B 626, 127–138 (2005).
J. Mas, C. Seijas, and M. Pérez-Victoria, “The Beta Function of N = 1 SYM in Differential Renormalization,” J. High Energy Phys., No. 3, 049 (2002).
D. Z. Freedman, K. Johnson, and J. Latorre, “Differential Regularization and Renormalization: A New Method of Calculation in Quantum Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 371, 353–414 (1992).
A. A. Slavnov, “Invariant Regularization of Non-linear Chiral Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 31, 301–315 (1971).
A. A. Slavnov, “Invariant Regularization of Gauge Theories,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 13(2), 174–177 (1972) [Theor. Math. Phys. 13, 1064–1066 (1972)].
V. K. Krivoshchekov, “Invariant Regularization for Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 36(3), 291–302 (1978) [Theor. Math. Phys. 36, 745–752 (1978)].
P. West, “Higher Derivative Regulation of Supersymmetric Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 268, 113–124 (1986).
C. P. Martin and F. Ruiz Ruiz, “Higher Covariant Derivative Pauli-Villars Regularization Does Not Lead to a Consistent QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B 436, 545–581 (1995).
M. Asorey and F. Falceto, “Consistency of the Regularization of Gauge Theories by High Covariant Derivatives,” Phys. Rev. D 54, 5290–5301 (1996).
T. D. Bakeyev and A. A. Slavnov, “Higher Covariant Derivative Regularization Revisited,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11, 1539–1554 (1996).
D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, “Ultraviolet Behavior of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343–1346 (1973).
H. D. Politzer, “Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346–1349 (1973).
P. I. Pronin and K. V. Stepanyantz, “One-Loop Counterterms for Higher Derivative Regularized Lagrangians,” Phys. Lett. B 414, 117–122 (1997).
S. Arnone, T. R. Morris, and O. J. Rosten, “Manifestly Gauge Invariant QED,” J. High Energy Phys., No. 10, 115 (2005).
T. R. Morris and O. J. Rosten, “Manifestly Gauge-Invariant QCD,” J. Phys. A 39, 11657–11681 (2006).
O. J. Rosten, “On the Renormalization of Theories of a Scalar Chiral Superfield,” J. High Energy Phys., No. 3, 004 (2010).
S. Arnone, A. Gatti, T. R. Morris, and O. J. Rosten, “Exact Scheme Independence at Two Loops,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 065009 (2004).
T. R. Morris and O. J. Rosten, “A Manifestly Gauge Invariant, Continuum Calculation of the SU(N) Yang-Mills Two-Loop β Function,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 065003 (2006).
S. Arnone, Y. A. Kubyshin, T. R. Morris, and J. F. Tighe, “Gauge-Invariant Regularization via SU(N|N),” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 2283–2329 (2002).
A. A. Soloshenko and K. V. Stepanyantz, “Three-Loop β-Function for N = 1 Supersymmetric Electrodynamics, Regularized by Higher Derivatives,” arXiv: hep-th/0304083.
A. A. Soloshenko and K. V. Stepanyantz, “Three-Loop β-Function of N = 1 Supersymmetric Electrodynamics Regularized by Higher Derivatives,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 140(3), 437–459 (2004) [Theor. Math. Phys. 140, 1264–1282 (2004)].
A. Smilga and A. Vainshtein, “Background Field Calculations and Nonrenormalization Theorems in 4d Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Their Low-Dimensional Descendants,” Nucl. Phys. B 704, 445–474 (2005).
K. V. Stepanyantz, “Investigation of the Anomaly Puzzle in N = 1 Supersymmetric Electrodynamics,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 142(1), 37–57 (2005) [Theor. Math. Phys. 142, 29–47 (2005)].
A. B. Pimenov, A. A. Soloshenko, K. V. Stepanyantz, and E. S. Shevtsova, “Regularization by Higher Derivatives and Quantum Correction for N = 1 Supersymmetric Theories,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Fiz. 51(5), 5–35 (2008) [Russ. Phys. J. 51, 444–479 (2008)].
A. B. Pimenov, E. S. Shevtsova, and K. V. Stepanyantz, “Calculation of Two-Loop β-Function for General N = 1 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory with the Higher Covariant Derivative Regularization,” Phys. Lett. B 686, 293–297 (2010).
P. West, Introduction to Supersymmetry and Supergravity (World Sci., Singapore, 1986).
I. L. Buchbinder and S. V. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity (Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 1998).
A. A. Slavnov, “Universal Gauge Invariant Renormalization,” Phys. Lett. B 518, 195–200 (2001).
A. A. Slavnov, “Regularization-Independent Gauge-Invariant Renormalization of the Yang-Mills Theory,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 130(1), 3–14 (2002) [Theor. Math. Phys. 130, 1–10 (2002)].
A. A. Slavnov and K. V. Stepanyantz, “Universal Invariant Renormalization for Supersymmetric Theories,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 135(2), 265–279 (2003) [Theor. Math. Phys. 135, 673–684 (2003)].
A. A. Slavnov and K. V. Stepanyantz, “Universal Invariant Renormalization for the Supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 139(2), 179–191 (2004) [Theor. Math. Phys. 139, 599–608 (2004)].
L. D. Faddeev and A. A. Slavnov, Gauge Fields: An Introduction to Quantum Theory (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1991).
N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, “Holomorphy, Rescaling Anomalies and Exact β Functions in Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,” J. High Energy Phys., No. 6, 030 (2000).
V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “Exact Gell-Mann-Low Function of Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories from Instanton Calculus,” Nucl. Phys. B 229, 381–393 (1983).
V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “The Beta Function in Supersymmetric Gauge Theories: Instantons versus Traditional Approach,” Phys. Lett. B 166, 329–333 (1986).
M. A. Shifman and A. I. Vainshtein, “Solution of the Anomaly Puzzle in SUSY Gauge Theories and the Wilson Operator Expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 277, 456–486 (1986).
A. B. Pimenov and K. V. Stepanyantz, “Four-Loop Verification of an Algorithm for Summing Feynman Diagrams in the N = 1 Supersymmetric Electrodynamics,” Teor. Mat. Fiz. 147(2), 290–302 (2006) [Theor. Math. Phys. 147, 687–697 (2006)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in Russian in Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V.A. Steklova, 2011, Vol. 272, pp. 266–276.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stepanyantz, K.V. Higher covariant derivative regularization for calculations in supersymmetric theories. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 272, 256–265 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S008154381101024X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S008154381101024X