Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Influence of Wind and Solar Power Plants, Cogeneration, and Coal Share in the Fuel Balance on the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

  • THE INSTITUTE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND HYDROGEN TECHNOLOGIES OF NRU MPEI IS 70 YEARS OLD
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The energy transition for “green” hydrogen is supposed to be carried out through a widescale use of wind energy. The area of wind farms required for this purpose may reach 38.5% of the European Union’s territory. In the scientific literature, it is pointed out that the use of wind turbines for meeting 10% of the world demand for energy can result in that the land surface temperature will increase by more than 1°C by 2100. A change in the temperature is observed immediately after commissioning of wind farms, whereas the climatic gain from reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is a matter of the future. Currently, no attention is paid to the influence of wind and solar power plants (WPPs and SPPs) on the growth of greenhouse gas emissions as a consequence of changes in the structure and loading conditions of generating capacities in the power system. The aim of this work is to determine the possibility of reducing the amount of greenhouse gas emissions in the power system by changing the fuel-balance structure, achieving more efficient generation of electricity, developing WPPs and SPPs, and consider methods for implementing it. Assessments of the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by power plants in changing the structure of generating capacities and also in replacing one fuel kind by another are given. It is shown that nowadays, the balance of demand and offer in the power system, e.g., of Germany, is maintained owing to electric energy export. For the period from 2000 to 2018, the amount of electricity generated by WPPs and SPPs increased by 146 TW h, whereas that by nuclear power plants (NPPs) dropped by 94 TW h, while the export of electric energy to the power systems of neighboring countries increased by 52 TW h. The decrease in the amount of electricity generated by coal-fired thermal power plants (TPPs) by 69 TW h was compensated by increasing the amount of electricity generated by natural gas fired thermal power plants by 34 TW h, and by 47 TW h owing to power plants that use biogas, solid and liquid biofuel, and solid municipal waste as fuel. Study results have shown that, in the absence of energy storage devices, the development of wind and solar power plants cannot be regarded as an efficient way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the power system, the more so that WPPs and SPPs are significantly inferior to various combined electricity- and heat-generation versions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. On Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, RF President Decree No. 666 of November 4, 2020.

  2. On Approval of the Social and Economical Development Strategy of the Russian Federation with Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions until 2050, RF Government Resolution No. 3052-r of Oct. 29, 2021.

  3. On Conducting an Experiment to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Certain Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation, RF Federal Law No. 34-FZ of Mar. 06, 2022.

  4. On Approval of the Rules for Calculating and Charging Fees for Exceeding the Greenhouse Gas Emission Quota as Part of an Experiment to Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Sakhalin Region, RF Government Regulation No. 1390 of Aug. 5, 2022.

  5. On the Rate of Payment for Exceeding the Quota of Greenhouse Gas Emissions as Part of an Experiment to Limit Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Sakhalin Region, RF Government Regulation No. 1441 of Aug. 18, 2022.

  6. A. A. Romanovskaya, A. I. Nakhutin, V. A. Ginzburg, V. A. Grbar, E. V. Imshennik, R. T. Karaban’, V. N. Korotkov, V. Yu. Vertyankina, T. V. Grigurina, I. L. Govor, G. G. Litvinchuk, V. M. Lytov, P. D. Polumieva, N. V. Popov, A. A. Trunov, and L. A. Prokhorova, National Report on the Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions from Sources and Removals by Sinks of Greenhouse Gases not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2020, Part 1 (Moscow, 2022).

  7. S. S. Beloborodov, “CO2 emission reduction: Developing cogeneration or building renewable energy plants?,” Energosovet, No. 1(51), 16–25 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Staffell, M. Jansen, A. Chase, E. Cotton, and C. Lewis, Energy Revolution: A Global Outlook (Selby, Drax, 2018).

  9. A Hydrogen Strategy for a Climate-Neutral Europe: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (European Commission, Brussels, 2020).

  10. A New Industrial Strategy for Europe: Communication from the Commission (European Commission, Brussels, 2020).

  11. C. Andrey, P. Barberi, L. Lacombe, L. van Nuffel, F. Gerard, J. Gorenstein Dedecca, K. Rademaekers, Y. el Idrissi, and M. Crenes, Study on Energy Storage — Contribution to the Security of the Electricity Supply in Europe (European Union, 2020).

  12. C. Andrey, P. Attard, R. Bardet, L. Fournie, and P. Khallouf, Mainstreaming RES: Flexibility Portfolios. Design of Flexibility Portfolios at Member State Level to Facilitate a Cost-Efficient Integration of High Shares of Renewables (European Union, 2017).

  13. S. S. Beloborodov, E. G. Gasho, and A. V. Nenashev, “EU transition to hydrogen energy: Need for resources,” Prom. Energ., No. 6, 36–47 (2021).

  14. C. Wang and R. G. Prinn, “Potential climatic impacts and reliability of very large-scale wind farms,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 2053–2061 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2053-2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. W. Keith, J. F. DeCarolis, D. C. Denkenberger, D. H. Lenschow, S. L. Malyshev, S. Pacala, and P. J. Rasch, “The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 16115–16120 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406930101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. M. Miller and D. W. Keith, “Climatic impacts of wind power,” Joule 2, 2618–2632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Electric Power Annual 2019 (U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020).

  18. EU Energy in Figures: Statistical Pocketbook (European Union, Luxembourg, 2014–2020).

  19. S. S. Beloborodov, “Ensuring a balance between electric power production and consumption in the power system of Germany in the days with maximum production of renewables,” Elektr. Stn., No. 2, 16–22 (2020).

  20. S. S. Beloborodov and A. A. Dudolin, “Influence of the development of renewables on the balance of electric power production and consumption in the Unified Energy System of Russia,” Nov. Ross. Elektroenerg., No. 5, 6–17 (2020).

  21. S. S. Beloborodov, “Carbon footprint of wind and solar farms,” Elektr. Stn., No. 8, 10–18 (2022).

  22. S. S. Beloborodov and A. A. Dudolin, “Analysis of the presence of a regulatory range in the Unified Energy System and the placement of “base” generation in the territory of the Russian Federation,” Nov. Ross. Elektroenerg., No. 7, 6–16 (2017).

  23. Power Generation and Consumption (Agora Energiewende, Smart Energy for Europe Platform (SEFEP)).

  24. L. A. Melent’ev, System Research in the Energy Sector: Elements of Theory, Development Directions, 2nd ed. (Nauka, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. V. Ershevich, A. N. Zeiliger, G. A. Illarionov, L. Ya. Rudykh, D. L. Faibisovich, R. M. Frishberg, L. D. Khabachev, and I. M. Shapiro, Handbook on Design of Electric Power Systems, 3rd ed. (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. A. Makarov and N. I. Voropai, System Research in the Energy Sector: Methodology and Results (Inst. Energ. Issled. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. A. Melent’ev, Scientific Fundamentals of Heating and Heat Supply of Cities and Industrial Enterprises: Scientific Publication (Nauka, Moscow, 1993) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yu. N. Rudenko, “Methodical issues of large energy system reliability study,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Energ. Transp., No. 1, 7–17 (1976).

  29. S. S. Beloborodov, “On the necessity to apply a system approach when designing the development of the Unified Energy System of Russia,” Elektr. Stn., No. 9, 2–9 (2021).

  30. W. Hafele, J. Anderer, A. McDonald, and N. Nakicenovic, Energy in a Finite World: Paths to Sustainable Future (Volume 1), Report by the Energy Systems Program Group of the International Inst. for Applied Systems Analysis (Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass., 1981).

  31. Yu. N. Rudenko and I. A. Ushakov, “On the issue of evaluating the survivability of complex energy systems,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Energ. Transp., No. 1, 14–20 (1979).

  32. G. N. Antonov, G. N. Cherkesov, and L. D. Krivorutskii, Methods and Models of Studying the Survivability of Energy Systems (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1990), pp. 9–17 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. I. Voropai, G. F. Kovalev, and Yu. N. Kucherov, Concept of Providing Reliability in Electric Power Industry (Energiya, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yu. N. Rudenko, F. I. Sin’chugov, and E. P. Smirnov, “Main terms deciding the property of “reliability” of energy systems,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Energ. Transp., No. 2, 3–17 (1981).

  35. S. S. Beloborodov, “Influence of the development of renewables on the competitiveness of the centralized power supply system of industrial consumers in the power system of Germany and on the change in operation modes of the gas network,” Elektr. Stn., No. 9, 2–11 (2020).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NP Energy Efficient City, 195094, Moscow, Russia

    S. S. Beloborodov

  2. National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, 111250, Moscow, Russia

    E. G. Gasho

Authors
  1. S. S. Beloborodov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. G. Gasho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. S. Beloborodov or E. G. Gasho.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by V. Filatov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beloborodov, S.S., Gasho, E.G. Evaluating the Influence of Wind and Solar Power Plants, Cogeneration, and Coal Share in the Fuel Balance on the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Therm. Eng. 70, 760–768 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601523100014

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601523100014

Keywords:

Search

Navigation