Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Studies of the Biochar Production Process Using Hydrothermal Carbonization and Superheated Steam Torrefaction

  • STEAM BOILERS, POWER PLANT FUELS, BURNERS, AND BOILER AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

Accumulation of chicken manure with litter (sawdust or fragmented straw) that is produced in large quantities at poultry farms (in producing 1 kg of poultry, 1–3 kg of manure with litter is obtained) poses a serious problem for the environment. Poultry farms are among the largest consumers of electricity, which can be generated by combusting manure with litter, also jointly with coal, in bubbling or circulating fluidized bed furnaces. For making the combustion more efficient and environmentally friendly (reducing carbon oxide emissions) the manure wetness and the content of volatiles in it should be decreased, and its heating value should be increased. To this end, manure with litter can be subjected, prior to its combustion, to pretreatment using the hydrothermal carbonization or torrefaction method. The article presents a comparison of the results obtained from studies of methods for processing a mixture of chicken manure and sawdust into biofuel in superheated steam. Chicken manure and its mixture with sawdust in the ratios 1 : 1, 1 : 2, and 2 : 1 were subjected to thermochemical treatment. Hydrothermal carbonization was carried out in a batch laboratory autoclave at a temperature of 220°С for 1 and 4 h. Biomass torrefaction was carried out in a fluidized bed reactor with the bed formed by biochar particles that were preliminarily obtained in superheated steam at temperatures of 300 and 350°С. It has been found that by applying the hydrothermal carbonization method, the carbon content in manure with litter can be increased from 42 to 63%, and the higher heating value from 16.7 to 17.8 MJ/kg. In turn, by applying the method of fluidized bed torrefaction in superheated steam, these indicators can be increased to 75% and 18.8 MJ/kg, respectively. The hydrothermal carbonization and torrefaction processes require significant energy expenditures. For making both processes more economically efficient, the possibility of extracting, from the spent water (or condensate), 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, which is regarded as a key reagent, a so-called platform chemical, for producing various practically important substances, including polymers, pharmaceutical drugs, solvents, and fuels, is being researched. It has been determined that the content of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in these aqueous media makes 0.02–0.80 g/dm3 and depends on the biomass thermochemical treatment method and temperature at which the process was performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. C. C. Bitzer and J. T. Sims, “Estimating the availability of nitrogen in poultry manure through laboratory and field studies,” J. Environ. Qual. 17, 47–54 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1988.00472425001700010007x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. J. Stevenson, Cycles of Soil: Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutrients (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. P. Kelleher, J. J. Leahy, A. M. Henihan, T. F. O’Dwyer, D. Sutton, and M. J. Leahy, “Advances in poultry litter disposal technology — A review,” Bioresour. Technol. 83, 27–36 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. S. Pandey, M. Kwapinska, A. Gómez-Barea, A. Horvat, L. E. Fryda, L. P. L. Rabou, J. J. Leahy, and W. Kwapinski, “Poultry litter gasification in a fluidized bed reactor: Effects of gasifying agent and limestone addition,” Energy Fuels 30, 3085–3096 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. C. Taupe, D. Lynch, R. Wnetrzak, M. Kwapinska, W. Kwapinski, and J. J. Leahy, “Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale — A case study,” Waste Manage. 50, 324–333 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kumar, A. O. Oyedun, and A. Kumar, “A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 81, 1742–1770 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Liu and F.-S. Zhang, “Removal of lead from water using biochars prepared from hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass,” J. Hazard. Mater. 167, 933–939 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Liu, F.-S. Zhang, and J. Wu, “Characterization and application of chars produced from pinewood pyrolysis and hydrothermal treatment,” Fuel 89, 510–514 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Sevilla, A. B. Fuertes, and R. Mokaya, “High density hydrogen storage in superactivated carbons from hydrothermally carbonized renewable organic materials,” Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1400–1410 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00347F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sevilla and A. B. Fuertes, “Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture,” Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1765–1771 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00784F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sevilla, J. A. Maciá-Agulló, and A. B. Fuertes, “Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass as a route for the sequestration of CO2: Chemical and structural properties of the carbonized products,” Biomass Bioenergy 35, 3152–3159 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Sevilla and A. B. Fuertes, “The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose,” Carbon 47, 2281–2289 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. W.-H. Chen, S.-C. Ye, and H.-K. Sheen, “Hydrothermal carbonization of sugarcane bagasse via wet torrefaction in association with microwave heating,” Bioresour. Technol. 118, 195–203 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Q.-V. Bach, K.-Q. Tran, R. A. Khalil, Ø., Skreiberg, and G. Seisenbaeva, “Comparative assessment of wet torrefaction,” Energy Fuels 27, 6743–6753 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401295w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. C. A. Bergman and J. H. A. Kiel, “Torrefaction for biomass upgrading,” in Proc. 14th Eur. Biomass Conf. and Exhibition, Paris, France, Oct. 17–21, 2005 (ETA-Renewable Energies, Florence, Italy, 2005).

  16. A. Nordin, L. Pommer, M. Nordwaeger, and I. Olofsson, “Biomass conversion through torrefaction,” in Technologies for Converting Biomass to Useful Energy: Combustion, Gasification, Pyrolysis, Torrefaction and Fermentation, Ed. by E. Dahlquist (CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Kumar, A. A. Koukoulas, S. Mani, and J. Satyavolu, “Integrating torrefaction in the wood pellet industry: A critical review,” Energy Fuels 31, 37–54 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Koppejan, S. Sokhansanj, S. Melin, and S. Madrali, Status Overview of Torrefaction Technologies (IEA Bioenergy, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Godina, L. J. R. Nunes, F. M. B. C. Santos, and J. C. O. Matias, “Logistics cost analysis between wood pellets and torrefied biomass pellets: The case of Portugal,” in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), Oxford, U.K., Mar. 7–9, 2018 (IEEE, Piscataway, N. J., 2018), pp. 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITM.2018.8333962

  20. R. Ehrig, H. G. Gugler, C. Kristöfel, C. P. Pointner, I. Schmutzer-Roseneder, S. Feldmeier, M. K. Kolck, P. Rauch, C. Strasser, F. Schipfer, L. Kranzl, and M. W. Wörgetter, “Economic comparison of torrefaction-based and conventional pellet production-to-end-use chains,” in Proc. 21st Eur. Biomass Conf. and Exhibition, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3–7 June 2013 (ETA-Florence Renewable Energies, Florence, Italy, 2013), pp. 1342–1349. https://doi.org/10.5071/21stEUBCE2013-3DO.2.1

  21. D. Zhang, X. Chen, Z. Qi, H. Wang, R. Yang, W. Lin, J. Li, W. Zhou, and F. Ronsse, “Superheated steam as carrier gas and the sole heat source to enhance biomass torrefaction,” Bioresour. Technol. 331, 124955 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Roy, P. Kleine-Möllhoff, and A. Dalibard, “Superheated steam torrefaction of biomass residues with valorisation of platform chemicals. Part 1: Ecological assessment,” Sustainability 14, 1212 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. GOST R 54186-2010. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Moisture Content. Oven Dry Method. Part 1. Total Moisture. Reference Method (Standartinform, Moscow, 2010).

  24. GOST 32975.3-2014. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Moisture Content by Drying. Part 3. Moisture in General Analysis Sample (Standartinform, Moscow, 2019).

  25. GOST 32988-2014. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Ash Content (Standartinform, Moscow, 2015).

  26. GOST 32985-2014. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen by Instrumental Methods (Standartinform, Moscow, 2019).

  27. GOST 33256-2015. Solid Biofuels. Determination of Total Sulphur and Chlorine Content (Standartinform, Moscow, 2015).

  28. GOST 33106-2014. Solid Biofuel. Determination of Calorific Value (Standartinform, Moscow, 2015).

  29. I. Oliveira, D. Blöhse, and H.-G. Ramke, “Hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural residues,” Bioresour. Technol. 142, 138–146 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. A. De la Rubia, J. A. Villamil, J. J. Rodriguez, and A. F. Mohedano, “Effect of inoculum source and initial concentration on the anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction from hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge,” Renewable Energy 127, 697–704 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (agreement no. 075-11-2020-035 of December 15, 2020 IGK 000000S207520RNV0002. Project name is “Development of Technology and Equipment for Accelerated Hydrothermal Carbonization of Poultry Breeding Waste to Obtain a Semiproduct (Biochar) Suitable for Producing a High-Efficient Sorbent or Soil Improver”. Principal executor is Tambov State Technical University Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tambov State Technical University, 392032, Tambov, Russia

    R. L. Is’emin, S. N. Kuz’min, V. V. Konyakhin, O. Yu. Milovanov, A. V. Mikhalev, N. S. Muratova, A. V. Nebyvaev & V. S. Kokh-Tatarenko

Authors
  1. R. L. Is’emin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. N. Kuz’min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. V. Konyakhin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. Yu. Milovanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. V. Mikhalev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. N. S. Muratova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. V. Nebyvaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. V. S. Kokh-Tatarenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. L. Is’emin.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by V. Filatov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Is’emin, R.L., Kuz’min, S.N., Konyakhin, V.V. et al. Comparative Studies of the Biochar Production Process Using Hydrothermal Carbonization and Superheated Steam Torrefaction. Therm. Eng. 69, 981–988 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522120035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522120035

Keywords:

Search

Navigation