Skip to main content
Log in

Multistage Organic Rankine Cycles: Utilization of Medium Temperature (120°С) Geothermal Fluid

  • RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES AND HYDROPOWER
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

With a growth in the scales on which binary cycle (ORC) power units are constructed, new technical solutions aimed at improving the efficiency of binary technologies are searched for. To this end, the possibility of using multistage ORCs based on the principle of incremental (staged) conversion of geothermal fluid energy is also studied. In view of the fact that low-temperature geothermal resources dominate around the world (the fluid outlet temperature is lower than 130°С in up to 60% of all geothermal fields), the optimization calculated studies of two- and three-stage ORCs were carried out for a source geothermal fluid with a temperature of 120°С. The article presents the results of studying the effect that the choice of low-boiling organic substances and the geothermal fluid temperature in the stages have on achieving the cycle maximal power output and minimal fluid mass flowrate. The technical characteristics of two- and three-stage ORCs are compared with those of a conventional single-loop ORC power unit in the case of using various nontoxic and fire- and explosion-safe organic substances. It is shown that, by applying a three-stage process circuit with R-600 working fluid in all loops and using geothermal fluid with a temperature of 120°С, it is possible to increase the amount of heat transferred to the binary cycle by 36.5% in comparison with the single-stage process circuit. In accordance with the previously performed calculations, the growth of heat transferred to the binary cycle in the case of using geothermal fluid with a temperature of 180°С amounted to 15.0%. It has been found that the minimal (net and gross) mass flowrates of geothermal fluid with a temperature of 120°С in the three-stage process circuit are achieved in the case of using R-600 substance as working fluid in the first, second, and third stages and make 44.6 and 42.7 (kg/s)/MW, respectively. The obtained results can be used in the development and designing of multistage ORCs with the geothermal fluid temperature equal to 120°С.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Z. Gnutek and A. Bryszewska-Mazurek, “The thermodynamic analysis of multicycle ORC engine,” Energy 26, 1075–1082 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00070-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Heberle, T. Jahrfeld, and D. Brüggemann, “Thermodynamic analysis of double-stage Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy sources based on a case study for 5.5 MWe power plant Kirchstockach (Germany),” in Proc. World Geothermal Congr., Melbourne, Australia, Apr. 19–24, 2015 (International Geothermal Association, Melbourne, 2015).

  3. G. V. Tomarov and A. A. Shipkov, “Multistage geothermal ORC power units: Utilization of high-temperature (180°C) Geothermal Fluid,” Therm. Eng. 69, 259–266 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. V. Tomarov and A. A. Shipkov, “A combined binary-cycle geothermal power plant with a secondary flash steam superheating system: Choice of optimal working fluids,” Therm. Eng. 66, 822–829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601519110065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. DiPippo, Geothermal Power Plants. Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact, 4th ed. (Elsevier, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-02885-7

  6. V. A. Butuzov and G. V. Tomarov, “Geothermal energy of Kamchatka,” Therm. Eng. 67, 820–832 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S004060152011004X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. V. Tomarov and A. A. Shipkov, “Modern geothermal power: Binary cycle geothermal power plants,” Therm. Eng. 64, 243–250 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601517040097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Mahmoud, M. Ramadan, S. Naher, K. Pullen, M. A. Abdelkareem, and A.-G. Olabi, “A review of geothermal energy-driven hydrogen production systems,” Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 22, 100854 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. G. Yohanis, O. S. Popel, and S. E. Frid, “A simplified method of calculating heat flow through a two-phase heat exchanger,” Appl. Therm. Eng. 25, 2321–2329 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geothermal Binary Power Plants. Preliminary Study of Low Temperature Utilization, Cost Estimates and Energy Cost (Verkis Consulting Engineers, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2014).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to G. V. Tomarov or A. A. Shipkov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by V. Filatov

See our article published in Thermal Engineering, 69, 259–266 (2022).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomarov, G.V., Shipkov, A.A. Multistage Organic Rankine Cycles: Utilization of Medium Temperature (120°С) Geothermal Fluid. Therm. Eng. 69, 354–361 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522050068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601522050068

Keywords:

Navigation