Skip to main content
Log in

Thermo-Hydraulic Investigations of a Typical Small Modular PWR Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling

  • NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is widely used in different industrial applications. In this research, the application of CFD in the thermo-hydraulic evaluation for a typical small modular Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) was studied using ANSYS Fluent software. First, reactor core with different (pitch—fuel rod diameter) was simulated using MCNP code. Subsequently, axial neutron heat flux was calculated in the hottest rod. In the following, different fuel channels were simulated using ANSYS workbench and corresponding mass flow rate according to the fluid outlet temperature was computed using Fluent. Then, thermo-hydraulic parameters including pumping power, convective heat transfer coefficient and turbulent intensity were calculated. Artificial neural network (ANN) coupled with genetic algorithm (GA) was used for optimization; and pair pitch ‒ fuel rod diameter (0.012 m, 0.0072 m) was selected as the optimum value. Also, Critical Heat Flux (CHF) was computed with CFD-simulation, and compared with Tong CHF correlation and Groeneveld look-up table. A good agreement was observed between results, but CHF obtained from CFD simulation was more conservative. According to the results, Minimum Departure from Nucleate Boiling Ratio (MDNBR) was obtained as 2.12, which was compatible with its typical value. Accordingly, it could be concluded that the optimum reactor core was in the safe mode in the steady state conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The pumping power is the power required to overcome the pressure drop in the primary loop by the coolant.

REFERENCES

  1. R. Meroney, R. Ohba, B. Leitl, H. Kondo, D. Grawe, and T. Yoshihide, “Review of CFD guidelines for dispersion modeling,” Fluids 1, 14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids1020014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. L. Hosain and R. B. Fdhilaa, “Literature review of accelerated CFD simulation methods towards online application,” Energy Procedia 75, 3307–3314 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Farajollahi, A. Ghasemizad, and B. Khanbabaei, “CFD-calculation of fluid flow in a pressurized water reactor,” J. Sci. I. R. Iran 19, 273–281 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. V. Yudov, I. G. Petkevich, and V. G. Artemov, “Cross-verification of 1D and 3D models for a VVER-1000 reactor’s pressure chamber simulated by the KORSAR/CFD computation code in the modes with asymmetric loop operation,” Therm. Eng. 66, 953–959 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601519120115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Ebrahimian and G. R. Ansarifar, “Investigation of the nano fluid effects on heat transfer characteristics in nuclear reactors with dual cooled annular fuel using CFD (computational fluid dynamics) modeling,” Energy 98, 1–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2018).

  7. S. F. Mirian and N. Ayoobian, “Investigations on a typical small modular PWR using coupled neutronic-thermal-mechanical evaluations to achieve long-life cycle-length,” Prog. Nucl. Energy 119, 103176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kianpoor and G. R. Ansarifar, “Assessment of the nano-fluid effects on the thermal reactivity feedback coefficients in the VVER-1000 nuclear reactor with nanofluid as a coolant using thermal hydraulic and neutronics analysis,” Ann. Nucl. Energy 133, 623–636 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. FLUENT 6.3 User’s Guide (Fluent, 2006).

  10. T. Sreenivasulu and B. V. S. S. S. Prasad, “Flow and heat transfer characteristics in an annulus wrapped with a helical wire,” Int. J. Therm. Sci. 48, 1377–1391 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Zaidabadi, G. R. Ansarifar, and M. H. Esteki, “Thermal hydraulic analysis of VVER-1000 nuclear reactor with dual-cooled annular fuel using K-ω SST Turbulence model,” Ann. Nucl. Energy 101, 118–127 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Weisman, “Heat transfer to water flowing parallel to tube bundles,” Nucl. Sci. Eng. 6, 78–79 (1959). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. M. El-Wakil, Nuclear Heat Transport (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Ill., 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 User’s Guide (ANSYS, 2009). https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/ html/ug/main_pre.htm

  15. E. Alba and J. F. Chicano, “Training neural networks with GA hybrid algorithms,” in Proc. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf. (GECCO 2004), Seattle, Wash., June 26–30, 2004 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004), in Ser.: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3102, pp. 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_87

  16. H. Ishibuchi, T. Nakashima, and M. Nii, “Learning of neural networks with GA-based instance selection,” in Proc. Joint 9th IFSA World Congr. and 20th NAFIPS Int. Conf., Vancouver, B.C., Canada, July 25–28, 2001 (IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., 2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2001.944394

  17. R. Kianpoor, G. R. Ansarifar, and M. Fathi, “Optimal design of a VVER-1000 nuclear reactor core with dual cooled annular fuel based on the reactivity temperature coefficients using thermal hydraulic and neutronic analysis by implementing the genetic algorithms,” Ann. Nucl. Energy 148, 107682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. M. H. Mousakazemi, N. Ayoobian, and G. R. Ansarifar, “Control of the reactor core power in PWR using optimized PID controller with the real-coded GA,” Ann. Nucl. Energy 118, 107–121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. E. Todreas and M. S. Kazimi, Nuclear Systems, Vol. I: Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals, 2nd ed. (CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. K. Sarma, V. Srinivas, K. V. Sharma, V. Dharma Rao, and G. P. Celata, “A correlation to evaluate critical heat flux in small diameter tubes under subcooled conditions of the coolant,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 42–51 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.07.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. C. Groeneveld, L. K. H. Leung, Y. Guo, A. Vasic, M. El Nakla, S. W. Peng, J. Yang, and S. C. Cheng, “Lookup tables for predicting CHF and film-boiling heat transfer: Past, present, and future,” Nucl. Tech. 152, 87–104 (2005). https://doi.org/10.13182/NT152-87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Ayoobian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirian, S.F., Ayoobian, N. Thermo-Hydraulic Investigations of a Typical Small Modular PWR Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling. Therm. Eng. 68, 922–929 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521120077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601521120077

Keywords:

Navigation