Skip to main content
Log in

The Generation and Suppression of NOx and N2O Emissions in the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Process with Recycled CO2 (an Overview)

  • STEAM BOILERS, POWER-PLANT FUELS, BURNER UNITS, AND BOILER AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that combustion of solid fuels in an oxygen atmosphere with recycled flue gases is an efficient method for capture of CO2. The use of the circulating fluidized bed (CFB) technology in the oxy-fuel combustion process reduces the CO2 capture costs and nitrogen oxide emissions compared with flare combustion. The mechanisms of generation and suppression of nitrogen and nitrous oxides during CFB combustion of solid fuels are considered. The basic reactions that occur during the exit and burning of volatiles and combustion of char resulting in generation of NO, N2O, and N2 are indicated. The effect of the secondary air delivery on nitrogen oxide emissions is studied. It is shown that the degree of converting fuel nitrogen into N2O is reduced when the degree of converting nitrogen into NOx is increased. Comparative analysis that the effect of flue gas recycling and other process factors has on generation of NO and N2O during combustion in air, oxygen, and CO2 has been made. It is shown that, owing to recycling, the fractions of NOx and N2O generated from fuel nitrogen during oxy-fuel combustion are significantly lower than those during combustion in air. Mathematical simulation of various complicated processes related to generation and suppression of hazardous pollutant emissions has recently become a generally accepted method that allows the prediction at relatively low costs of such processes during the combustion of various fuels. However, as applied to new technologies for combustion of various biomass types and cofiring of coal and biomass, these methods have not yet been properly developed. The most preferable mathematical models for calculating nitrogen oxide emissions are provided, and the predicted results are compared with experimental data. The lines of further research, predominantly in the simulation of cofiring of coal and biomass, are outlined. It is shown that comprehensive investigations of generation and suppression of hazardous pollutant emissions during cofiring of coals and biomass of various kinds, in particular, during oxy-fuel combustion with recycled CO2 are of topical interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. Szakiert, J. Zuwada, and J. Lasek, “Oxy-fuel combustion: The state of the art,” in Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Fluidized Bed Technology, Kraków, May 23–26,2017 (Fundacja dla Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej im. Stanisława Staszica, Kraków, 2017), pp. 35–46.

  2. G. A. Ryabov, O. M. Folomeev, D. A. Sankin, K. V. Khaneev, I. G. Bondarenko, and D. A. Mel’nikov, “The use of circulating fluidized bed technology for large power generating units and CO2 capture,” Elektr. Stn., No. 2, 2–11 (2010).

  3. J. L. Marion, C. R. Bozzuto, N. Y. Nsakala, G. N. Liljedahl, H. E. Andrus, and R. P. Chamberland, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Control by Oxygen Firing in Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers: Phase 1 — A Preliminary Systems Evaluation (US Department of Energy, Alstom Power Inc. and National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2003). http://www.netl.doe.gov/coal/Carbon%20Sequestration/pubs/analysis/41146_R01_Volume%20I.

  4. A. Hotta, K. Nuortimo, T. Eriksson, J. Palonen, and S. Kokki, “CFB technology provides solutions to combat climate change, Foster Wheeler Energia Oy,” in Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Circulating Fluidized Bed, Plenary lecture, Finland, 2008 (2008), pp. 11–17.

  5. M. A. Nemitallah, M. A. Habib, H. M. Badr, and S. M. Said, “Oxy-fuel combustion technology: Current status, applications, and trends,” ER Int. J. Energy Res. 41, 1670–1708 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Okazake, “NOx reduction mechanism in coal combustion with recycled CO2” (2006). http://jairo.nii.ac.jp/ 0083/00026769.

  7. T. Mendiara and P. Glarborg, “Reburn chemistry in oxy-fuel combustion of methane,” Energy Fuels 23, 3565–3572 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Lopez and J. Calo, “The NO-carbon reaction: The influence of potassium and CO on reactivity and populations of oxygen surface complexes,” Energy Fuels 21, 1872–1877 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Sun, H. Cao, H. Chen, X. Wang, J. Qian, and T. Wall, “Experimental study of influence of temperature on fuel-N conversion and recycle NO reduction in oxyfuel combustion,” in Proc. Combust. Inst. 33, 1731–1738 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Wang, R. Zander, and M. Costa, “Oxy-fuel combustion characteristics of pulverized coal in a drop tube furnace,” Fuel 115, 452–460 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Winter, “Formation and reduction of pollutants in CFBC: From heavy metals, particulates, alkali, NOx, N2O, SOx, HCl,” in Proc. of the 20th Int. Conf. on Fluidized Bed Combustion (FBC-20), Xian, China, May 18–21,2009 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009), pp. 43–48.

  12. P. F. B. Hansen, K. Dam-Johansen, and J. E. Johnsson, “Catalytic reduction of NO and N2O on limestone during sulfur capture under fluidized bed combustion conditions,” Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 2419–2424 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cai Yi, L. Cheng, and L. Xu, “NOx and N2O emissions of burning coal with high alkali content in a circulating fluidized bed,” in Proc. of the 22nd Int. Conf. on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Turku, Finland, June 14–17, 2015 (2015), pp. 496–503.

  14. V. A. Munts, Patterns of Combustion of Fuels and Formation of Nitrogen Oxides in the Furnaces of Fluidized and Circulating Fluidized Bed, Doctoral Dissertation in Engineering (Yekaterinburg, 1999).

  15. R. Zailani, H. Liu, and B. M. Gibbs, “Carbon-capture and storage benefits: NOx reduction in O2/CO2 pulverized fuel combustion,” in Proc. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid and Clean Energy Technologies (IEEE ICSGCE 2011), Chengdu, China, Sept. 27–30,2011 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2011), pp. 45–50.

  16. R. Yoshiie, N. Nikosako, Y. Nunome, Y. Ueki, and I. Naruse, “Effects of flue gas re-circulation and nitrogen contents in coal on NOx emissions under oxy-fuel coal combustion,” Fuel Process. Technol. 136, 106–111 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Duan, H. Sun, C. Zhao, Wu Zhou, and X. Chen, “Coal combustion characteristics on an oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor with warm flue gas recycle,” Fuel 127, 47–51 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Obras-Loscertales, A. Rufas, L. F. de Diego, F. García-Labiano, P. Gayán, A. Abad, and J. Adánez, “Effects of temperature and flue gas recycle on the SO2 and NOx emissions in an oxyfuel fluidized bed combustor,” Energy Procedia 37, 1275–1282 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Qian, Chien-Song Chyang, Jiun-Bin Chiou, and Jim Tso, “Effect of flue gas recirculation (FGR) on NOx emission in a pilot-scale vortexing fluidized-bed combustor,” Energy Fuels 25, 5639–5646 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Hosoda, T. Hirama, N. Azuma, K. Kuramoto, J.‑I. Hayashi, and T. Chiba, “NOx and N2O emission in bubbling fluidized-bed coal combustion with oxygen and recycled flue gas: Macroscopic characteristics of their formation and reduction,” Energy Fuels 12, 102–108 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Duan, Zhao Changsui, Zhou Wu, Qu Chengrui, and Chen Xiaoping, “Effects of operation parameters on NO emission in an oxy-fired CFB combustor,” Fuel Process. Technol. 92, 379–384 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. A. Lasek, K. Głód, M. Janusz, K. Kazalski, and J. Zuwała, “Pressurized oxy-fuel combustion: A study of selected parameters,” Energy Fuels 26, 6492–6500 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Lupiáñez, L. I. Díez, and L. M. Romeo, “NO emissions from anthracite oxy-firing in a fluidized-bed combustor: Effect of the temperature, limestone, and O2,” Energy Fuels 27, 7619–7627 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Lupiáñez, L. I. Díez, and L. M. Romeo, “Influence of gas-staging on pollutant emissions from fluidized bed oxy-firing,” Chem. Eng. J. 256, 380–389 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Tan, S. Li, W. Li, E. Shou, and Q. Lu, “Effects of oxygen staging and excess oxygen on O2/CO2 combustion with a high oxygen concentration in a circulating fluidized bed,” Energy Fuels 28, 2069–2075 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Croiset and K. V. Thambimuthu, “NOx and SO2 emissions from O2/CO2 recycle coal combustion,” Fuel 80, 2117–2121 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Lupion, Alvarez Iñaki, Otero Pedro, Kuivalainen Reijo, Lantto Jouni, Hotta Arto, and Hack Horst, “30 MWth CIUDEN oxy-CFB boiler — First experiences,” Energy Procedia 37, 6179–6188 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Liu, R. Zailani, and B. M. Gibbs, “Comparisons of pulverized coal combustion in air and in mixtures of O2/CO2,” Fuel 84, 833–840 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L. Duan, Y. Duan, C. Zhao, and E. J. Anthony, “NO emission during co-firing coal and biomass in an oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed combustor,” Fuel 150, 8–13 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Rehfeldt, C. Bergins, A. Leisse, and S. Wu, “Basic experiments and CFD calculations of air and oxyfuel firing of lignite and bituminous coals in 0.5 and 1 MW scale combustion test facilities,” in Proc. of the 34th Int. Tech. Conf. on Clean Coal and Fuel Systems 2009, Cleawater, FL, May 31 – June 4,2009 (Curran, Red Hook, NY, 2009), pp. 69–80.

  31. H. Li, S. Li., Qiangqiang Ren, W. Li, M. Xu, J. Z. Liu, and Qinggang Lu, “Experimental results for oxy-fuel combustion with high oxygen concentration in a 1MWth pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed,” Energy Procedia. 63, 362–371 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. T. Wall, Y. Liu, C. Spero, L. Elliott, S. Khare, R. Rathnam, F. Zeenathal, B. Moghtaderi, B. Buhre, C. Sheng, R. Gupta, T. Yamada, K. Makino, and J. Yu, “An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion — State of the art research and technology development,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87, 1003–1016 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. https://cae-expert.ru/product/ansys-chemkin-pro

  34. A. Magdziarz, M. Wilk, and M. Zajemska, “Modelling of pollutants concentrations from the biomass combustion process,” Chem. Proc. Eng. 32 (4), 423–433 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Zajemska, D. Musia, H. Radomiak, A. Poskart, T. Wylecia, and D. Urbaniak, “Formation of pollutants in the process of co-combustion of different biomass grades,” Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 4, 1445–1448 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. B. Lou, Y. Xiong, M. Li, J. Ni, X. Wang, and K. Ma, “NOx emission model for the grate firing of biomass fuel,” BioResources 11, 634–650 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. Radomiak, A. Bala-Litwiniak, M. Zajemska, and D. Musia, “Numerical prediction of the chemical composition of gas products at biomass combustion and co-combustion in a domestic boiler,” E3S Web Conf. 14, 02043 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171402043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Zajemska, P. Urbańczyk, A. Poskart, D. Urbaniak, H. Radomiak, D. Musiał, G. Golański, and T. Wyleciał, “The impact of co-firing sunflower husk pellets with coal in a boiler on the chemical composition of the gas,” E3S Web Conf. 14, 02021 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171402021

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. A. Ryabov.

Additional information

Translated by O. Lotova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalid El Sheikh, Ryabov, G.A., Hamid, M.D. et al. The Generation and Suppression of NOx and N2O Emissions in the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Process with Recycled CO2 (an Overview). Therm. Eng. 67, 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601519120048

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601519120048

Keywords:

Navigation