Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation criteria study for continuous stirred tank reactor and plug flow reactor

Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

All reactors in reality are not ideal plug flow reactor (PFR) or ideal continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). They are difficult to differentiate. This study was to investigate the reactor analysis of PFR and CSTR through tracer response curves, residence time distributions (RTD) and several hydraulic performance indexes. We set up the differentiated value of each index. The tracer response curve showed that our lab-scale CSTR was close to ideal CSTR and got 99.9% recovery. In the RTD curves, the results could significantly recognize the PFR nature of high rate pond (HRP). With hydraulic performance indexes study, every selected index demonstrated that the studied HRP was closer to PFR than the studied CSTR. Based on the lab-scale study results, this study established the cutting point between the PFR and CSTR in each index; we were looking through the different types of reactors in literature and we confirmed the criteria with all literature reactors with the “graphic method”. The method helped us to establish those important values to help us to differentiate the reactor types in practice and to understand the designs better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jupsin, H., Praet, E., and Vasel, J.L., Dynamic mathematical model of high rate algal ponds (HRAP), Water Sci. Technol., 2003, vol. 48, p. 197.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.

  3. Binaghi, L., Del Borghi, A., Lodi, A., Converti, A., and Del Borghi, M., Batch and fed-batch uptake of carbon dioxide by Spirulina platensis, Process Biochem., 2003, vol. 38, p. 1341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Powell, E.E., Mapiour, M.L., Evitts, R.W., and Hill, G.A., Growth kinetics of Chlorella vulgaris and its use as a cathodic half cell, Bioresour. Technol., 2009, vol. 100, p. 269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carvalho, A.P. and Malcata, F.X., Transfer of carbon dioxide within cultures of microalgae: plain bubbling versus hollow-fiber modules, Biotechnol. Prog., 2001, vol. 17, p. 265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, Q.L. and Zhao, X.M., In situ carbon dioxide fixation in the process of natural astaxanthin production by a mixed culture of Haematococcus pluvialis and Phaffia rhodozyma, Catal. Today, 2004, vol. 98, p. 537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fogler, H.S., Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lion, L.W., Reactor Characteristics, CEE 453: Laboratory Research in Environmental Engineering, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garrido, J.M., van Benthum, W.A.J., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., and Heijnen, J.J., Influence of dissolved oxygen concentration on nitrite accumulation in a biofilm airlift suspension reactor, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1997, vol. 53, p. 168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Langenhoff, A.A.M. and Stuckey, D.C., Treatment of dilute wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: effect of low temperature, Water Res., 2000, vol. 34, p. 3867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ouarghi, E.I., Boumansour, B.E., Dufayt, O., Hamouri, E.I., and Vasel, J.L., Hydrodynamics and oxygen balance in a high-rate algal pond, Water Sci. Technol., 2000, vol. 42, p. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levenspiel, O., The Chemical Reactor Omnibook, Corvallis, Ore.: Oregon State University Book Stores, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kadlec, R.H. and Knight, R.L., Treatment Wetlands, Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, L., Effects of initial microbial density on disinfection efficiency in a continuous flow system and validation of disinfection batch kinetics in a continuous flow system, PhD Dissertation, Philadelphia: Drexel University, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burrows, L.J., West, J.R., Forster, C.F., and Martin, A., Mixing studies in an Orbal activated sludge system, Water SA, 2001, vol. 27, p. 79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y., Sanly, Brannock, M., and Leslie, G., Diagnosis of membrane bioreactor performance through residence time distribution measurements-a preliminary study, Desalination, 2009, vol. 236, p. 120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Padoley, K.V., Rajvaidya, A.S., Subbarao, T.V., and Pandey, R.A., Biodegradation of pyridine in a completely mixed activated sludge process, Bioresour. Technol., 2006, vol. 97, p. 1225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saravanathamizhana, R., Paranthamana, R., Balasubramaniana, N., and Ahmed, B.C., Residence time distribution in continuous stirred tank electrochemical reactor, Chem. Eng. J., 2008, vol. 142, p. 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Escudié, R., Conte, T., Steyer, J.P., and Delgenés, J.P., Hydrodynamic and biokinetic models of an anaerobic fixed-bed reactor, Process Biochem., 2005, vol. 40, p. 2311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lima, A. and Hodouin, D., Residence time distribution of an industrial mechanically agitated cyanidation tank, Miner. Eng., 2005, vol. 18, p. 613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tizghadam, M., Dagot, C., and Baudu, M., Wastewater treatment in a hybrid activated sludge baffled reactor, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, vol. 154, p. 550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, X., Putz, G., Mazurek, K.A., and Albers, C., Effect of columns on the flow behavior and residence time distribution in a water treatment plant clearwell, Proc. CSCE 2008 Ann. Conf., Quebec City, Canada, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krishna, G.G., Kumar, P., and Kumar, P., Treatment of low-strength soluble wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), J. Environ. Manage., 2009, vol. 90, p. 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Persson, J., Somes, N.L.G., and Wong, T.H.F., Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds, Water Sci. Technol., 1999, vol. 40, p. 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh, S., Haberl, R., Moog, O., Shrestha, R.R., Shrestha, P., and Shrestha, R., Performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland treating high-strength wastewater in Nepal-a model for DEWATS, Ecol. Eng., 2009, vol. 35, p. 654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morrill, A.B., Sedimentation basin research and design, J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 1932, vol. 24, p. 1442.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. US EPA Design Manual, Municipal Wastewater Disinfection: EPA/625/1-86/021, Cincinnati: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986.

  28. Maksymetz, B., Development of a real-time disinfection (CT) program at a large conventional water treatment plant, Proc. WCWWA Conf., Calgary, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, Y.I. and Bae, B.U., Design and evaluation of hydraulic baffled-channel PAC contactor for taste and odor removal from drinking water supplies, Water Res., 2007, vol. 41, p. 2256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Koukou, M.K., Papayannakos, N., and Markatos, N.C., Dispersion effects on membrane reactor performance, AIChE J., 1996, vol. 42, p. 2607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Philipossian, A. and Mitchell, E., Dispersion number studies in CMP of interlayer dielectric films, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2003, vol. 150, p. G854.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. H. Chen.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, D.D.W., Chen, P.H. Differentiation criteria study for continuous stirred tank reactor and plug flow reactor. Theor Found Chem Eng 47, 750–757 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579513060122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579513060122

Keywords

Navigation