Abstract
The new approach for the determination of orbital exponents and contracted coefficients for STO-3G family basis sets has been proposed. Calculations of the necessary coefficients have been performed using Mathcad program package with Minerr solving block. This approach has been used to perform the approximation of the Slater-type orbital (STO) by three Gaussian-type orbitals (GTO). The performance of such modified basis sets has been tested for the calculations of atomic energies using STO(0)-3G basis set and for nuclear magnetic shielding tensors using STO(1M)-3G basis set. The obtained atomic energies are characterized by lower values than those calculated using old parameters. The results for 1H and 13C chemical shifts calculations demonstrate better agreement with the experimental data compared to the data obtained using standard basis sets, such as 6-311G (2d, p), cc-pVDZ and pcS-1. Required time of calculations using the basic set suggested by us is less than the time spent on the calculation using standard basic sets with a similar number of basis functions. Physically adapted and at the same time small by size basic set STO(1M)-3G is perspective for the calculation of magnetic properties of big molecular systems. Proton and 13C chemical shifts have been calculated for molecules of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and flavinadenine dinucleotide (FAD), that play an important role in various biological processes. For both molecules the results of the calculation have shown values close to the experimental data.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
E. J. Baerends, D. E. Ellis, and P. Ros, Chem. Phys. 2, 41 (1973). doi 10.1016/0301-0104(73)80059-X
C. Fonseca Guerra, J. G. Snijders, G. te Velde, and E. J. Baerends, Theor. Chem. Acc. 99, 391 (1998). doi 10.1007/s002140050353
G. te Velde, F. M. Bickelhaupt, E. J. Baerends, C. Fonseca Guerra, S. J. A. van Gisbergen, J. G. Snijders, and T. Ziegler, J. Comput. Chem. 22, 931 (2001). doi 10.1002/jcc.1056
T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007 (1989). doi 10.1063/1.456153
D. Feller, K. A. Peterson, and J. Grant Hill, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 044102 (2011). doi 10.1063/1.3613639
K. A. Peterson and T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 117, 10548 (2002). doi 10.1063/1.1520138
B. P. Prascher, D. E. Woon, K. A. Peterson, T. H. Dunning, Jr., and A. K. Wilson, Theor. Chem. Acc. 128, 69 (2011). doi 10.1007/s00214-010-0764-0
A. D. McLean and G. S. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 5639 (1980). doi 10.1063/1.438980
R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980). doi 10.1063/1.438955
F. Jensen, Theor. Chem. Acc. 104, 484 (2000). doi 10.1007/s002140000174
F. Jensen, J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 11198 (2007). doi 10.1021/jp068677h
F. Jensen, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 114107 (2012). doi 10.1063/1.3690460
J. M. Foster and S. F. Boys, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 303 (1960). doi 10.1103/RevModPhys.32.303
W. J. Hehre, R. F. Stewart, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 2657 (1969). doi 10.1063/1.1672392
W. J. Hehre, R. Ditchfield, R. F. Stewart, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 2763 (1970). doi 10.1063/1.1673374
W. J. Pietro, B. A. Levi, W. J. Hehre, and R. F. Stewart, Inorg. Chem. 19, 2225 (1980). doi 10.1021/ic50210a005
W. J. Pietro, E. S. Blurock, R. F. Hout, Jr., W. J. Hehre, D. J. DeFrees, and R. F. Stewart, Inorg. Chem. 20, 3650 (1981). doi 10.1021/ic50225a013
W. J. Pietro and W. J. Hehre, J. Comput. Chem. 4, 241 (1983). doi 10.1002/jcc.540040215
B. Stewart, D. J. Hylton, and N. Ravi, J. Chem. Educ. 90, 609 (2013). doi 10.1021/ed300807y
V. V Rossikhin, V. V. Kuz’menko, E. O. Voronkov, and L. I. Zaslavskaya, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19801 (1996). doi 10.1021/jp952799k
V. V Rossikhin, S. I. Okovytyy, L. I. Kasyan, E. O. Voronkov, L. K. Umrikhina, and J. Leszczynski, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 4176 (2002). doi 10.1021/jp0139080
E. Voronkov, V. Rossikhin, S. Okovytyy, A. Shatckih, V. Bolshakov, and J. Leszczynski, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 112, 2444 (2012). doi 10.1002/qua.23256
K. Radula-Janik, T. Kupka, K. Ejsmont, Z. Daszkiewicz, and S. P. A. Sauer, Magn. Reson. Chem. 51, 630 (2013). doi 10.1002/mrc.3992
A. Buczek, M. Makowski, M. Jewgiński, R. Latajka, T. Kupka, and M. A. Broda, Biopolymers. 101, 28 (2014). doi 10.1002/bip.22264
T. Kupka, M. Stachów, L. Stobiński, and J. Kaminsky, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 67, 14 (2016). doi 10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.04.008
S. I. Okovytyy, E. O. Voronkov, V. V Rossikhin, O. K. Balalayev, and J. Leszczynski, J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 4930 (2004). doi 10.1021/jp0378081
A. Bolotin, V. Rossikhin, and E. Voronkov, Acta Phys. Hung. 70, 299 (1991). doi 10.1007/BF03054143
Mathcad (MathSoft Inc., Cambridge, MA).
V. Korobov and V. Ochkov, Chemical Kinetics with Mathcad and Maple (Springer, New York, 2011). doi 10.1007/978-3-7091-0531-3
C. C. Pye and C. J. Mercer, J. Chem. Educ. 89, 1405 (2012). doi 10.1021/ed300032f
C. Pisani, Quantum-Mechanical Ab-initio Calculation of the Properties of Crystalline Materials (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012). doi 10.1007/978-3-642-61478-1
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, et al., Gaussian 09 (Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2009).
S. Okovytyy, S. Kopteva, E. Voronkov, T. Sergeieva, K. Kapusta, L. Dmitrikova, and J. Leszczynski, Bull. Dnipropetr. Univ. Chem. 21, 7 (2013). doi 10.15421/081313
T. Kupka, M. Stachów, E. Chelmecka, K. Pasterny, M. Stobińska, L. Stobiński, and J. Kaminsky, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 4275 (2013). doi 10.1021/ct4002812
K. Kapusta, E. Voronkov, S. Okovytyy, and J. Leszczynski, Bull. Dnipropetr. Univ. Ser. Chem. 23, 8 (2015). doi 10.15421/081502
D. E. Hill, N. Vasdev, and J. P. Holland, Comput. Theor. Chem. 1051, 161 (2015). doi 10.1016/j.comptc.2014.11.007
D. Vikić-Topić and L. Pejov, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 1478 (2001). doi 10.1021/ci010042m
T. Kupka, Magn. Reson. Chem. 46, 851 (2008). doi 10.1002/mrc.2270
J. M. del Campo, J. L. Gázquez, S. B. Trickey, and A. Vela, J. Chem. Phys. 136 (2012). doi 10.1063/1.3691197
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST). http://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp.
Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank. http:// www.bmrb.wisc.edu/.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding of this research by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (Project no. 0116U001520), National Science Foundation (NSF/CREST HRD-1547754) and PREM (no. DMR-1205194) grants. This work also used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by National Science Foundation (grant no. ACI-1053575).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapusta, K., Voronkov, E., Okovytyy, S. et al. Reconstruction of STO-3G Family Basis Set for the Accurate Calculation of Magnetic Properties. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 92, 2827–2834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418130174
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024418130174