Abstract
The stability, electronic and magnetic properties of the GanMo (n = 2–10) clusters were investigated using DFT calculations at the TPSS/SDD method. The adsorption of the HCOH molecule over the surface of these clusters has also been evaluated in order to estimate their reactivity. The results reveal that the Ga4Mo and Ga7Mo clusters are found to be more stable than the other clusters, and the Mo atom in the binary clusters was viewed as the most favorable adsorption site for the molecules. The magnetic moments of the GanMo clusters vary from 0 and to 0.75 μB/atom, and their magnetism was mostly localized on Mo atom. The interaction of HCOH with the GanMo clusters is considered as a chemisorption process, with adsorption energies which vary from –24.5 to –49.1 kcal mol–1. The sensitivity of the GanMo clusters toward the HCOH molecule was also calculated, and the results show that these clusters could be employed as efficient nanosensors for the HCOH detection with a short recovery time.
REFERENCES
A. J. Cox, J. G. Louderback, and L. A. Bloomfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 923 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.923
B. Palpant, J. Lermé, E. Cottancin, M. Pellarin, and M. Treilleux, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1963 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1963
M. G. Bawendi, W.L. Wilson, L. Rothberg, P. J. Carroll, T. M. Jedju, M. L. Steigerwald, and L. E. Brus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1623 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1623
T. S. Zyubina, A. S. Zyubin, Y. A. Dobrovol’skii, V. M. Volokhov, A. V. Arsatov, and Z. G. Bazhanova, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 56, 1579 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602361111026X
A. J. Cox, J. G. Louderback, S. E. Apsel, and L. A. Bloomfield, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12295 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12295
M. B. Knickelbein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5255 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5255
A. P. Maltsev and O. P. Charkin, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 65, 185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621120111
X. Dong, L. Guo, C. Wen, N. Ren, and S. Niu, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 88, 1113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602441407031
A. P. Maltsev and O. P. Charkin, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 66, 1860 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621120111
A. Redjel, A. Boudjahem, and M. Bettahar, Partic. Sci. Technol. 36, 410 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2017.1295294
C.-H. Tu, A.-Q. Wang, M.-Y. Zheng, X.-D. Wang, and T. Zhang, Appl. Catal. A 297, 40 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.08.035
S. Wang and G. Q. Lu, Appl. Catal. A 169, 271 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00017-9
M. Higashiwaki and G. H. Jessen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 060401 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017845
S. Liu, K. Sweatman, S. McDonald, and K. Nogita, Materials 11, 1384 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081384
R. J. Wehmschulte, R. Peverati, and D. R Powell, Inorg. Chem. 58, 12441 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02136
M. R. Lichtenthaler, A. Higelin, A. Kraft, S. Hughes, A. Steffani, D. A. Plattner, J. M. Slattery and I. Krossing, Organometallics 32, 6725 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/om4005516
X. Xie, L. Lin, R.-Y. Liu, Y. F. Jiang, Q. Zhu, and A. Xu, J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8055 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA00622H
M. Saito, S. Watanabe, I. Takahara, M. Inaba, and K. Murata, Catal. Lett. 89, 213 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102575441313
Song, Bin, Pei-lin Cao, and Bao-xing Li, Phys. Lett. A 315, 308 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(03)01035-1
J.-Y. Yi, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7277 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.7277
L. Guo, Comput. Mater. Sci. 45, 951 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.01.001
E.-L. Li, et al., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 723, 79 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2004.11.029
B. Song and P.-L. Cao, Phys. Lett. A 328, 364 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2004.06.032
B. Song, C.-H. Yao, and P.-L. Cao, Phys. Rev. B 74, 035306 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035306
J. Tao, J. P. Perdew, V. N. Staroverov, and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91,146401 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.14640
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, et al., Gaussian 09, Revision D.01 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2013).
M. Dolg, U. Weding, H. Stoll, and H. Preuss, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 866 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452288
S. Lu, X. Xu, G. Feng, H. Xu, and W. Zheng, J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 25628 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08598
A. Posada-Amirillas and R. Pacheco-Conteras, Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 116, 1006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25119
W. Wang, Y. Deng, X. Chen, B. He, Z. Zhao, and H. Wang, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 96, 1028 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024422050296
F. Froben, W. Schulze, and U. Kloss, Chem. Phys. Lett. 99, 500 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(83)80183-3
I. Shim, K. Mandix, and K. Gingerich, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 5435 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1021/j100167a018
K. Das, J. Phys. B 30, 803 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/30/4/005
S. Ping, C. Ping, Z. Ping, L. Yang, and J. Xing, Physica B 406, 3544 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2011.06.017
S. Lee, D. Bylander, and L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. B 37, 10035 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.10035
A. Sumer, J. Phys. Chem. A. 125, 5201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c03052
J.-G. Han, R.-N. Zhao, and Y. Duan, J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 2148 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0661903
K. Balasubramanian, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 4861 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1497641
A. Boudjahem, M. Boulbazine, and M. Chettibi, J. Superconduct. Nov. Magn. 31, 3119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-018-4579-x
A. Soltani, A. Boudjahem, and M. Bettahar, Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 116, 346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25038
A. Boudjahem, M. Boulbazine, and M. Derdare, J. Superconduct. Nov. Magn. 34, 561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-020-05720-x
L. Wu, Y. Ji, D. Dai, T. Chen, D. Yang, Y. Liu, and Z. Wang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 31841 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.173
A.B. Dongil, Nanomaterials 9, 1111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9081111
A. Boudjahem, M. Boulbazine, and M. Derdare, Struct. Chem. 31, 2341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-020-01592-y
M. Boulbazine, A. Boudjahem, S. Chaguetmi, and A. Karaman, Mol. Phys. 118, e1643511 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2019.1643511
A. Karaman, A. Boudjahem, M. Boulbazine, and A. Gueid, Struct. Chem. 31, 203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01391-0
A. Arab, Mater. Today Commun. 26, 102013 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102013
M. Derdare and A. Boudjahem, Struct. Chem. 32, 2159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-021-01785-z
M. Derdare, A. Boudjahem, and N. Cheguib, Mol. Phys. 120, e2070088 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2022.2070088
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors, and all authors certify that they have participated competently in the work to take overall responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript.
Abdel-Ghani Boudjahem: supervision, project administration, writing-original draft, writing- review and editing; Nedjoua Cheghib: software, methodology; Meryem Derdare: conceptualization, investigation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nedjoua Cheghib, Derdare, M. & Boudjahem, AG. Stability, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of Mo-Doped Gallium Clusters and Their Sensitivity toward Formaldehyde Molecule. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 67 (Suppl 2), S85–S97 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622602008
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622602008