Abstract
Mössbauer spectroscopy has been applied for comparative study of the electronic state of probe iron atoms in perovskite-like nikelate LaNi0.99 57Fe0.01O3 and cuprate LaCu0.99 57Fe0.01O3. The valence states of the 57Fe atoms in these isostructural matrices are significantly different. In the nikelate, the iron atoms are in one of its ordinary valence state Fe3+, whereas, in the cuprate, the iron atoms have the formal oxidation state +4, as follows from hyperfine coupling parameters. The observed differences between the valence states of the 57Fe probe atoms are attributed to the different electronic structures of the Ni and Cu atoms in the perovskites. Configuration interaction calculations show that the major contribution to the electronic state of the cation-anion complex [NiO6]9− in the nikelate is made by the d 7 configuration. For the cuprate, the d 9 \( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle-}$}}{L} \) configuration dominates the electronic state of the [CuO6]9− complex. The existence of one electron hole (\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle-}$}}{L} \)) on oxygen atoms leads to partial charge transfer from the doped iron atoms in the cuprate, Fe3+ (d 5) + O− (\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle-}$}}{L} \)) → Fe4+ (d 4) + O2−. As a result, the ground state of the dopant cation-anion complex FeO6 can be represented as a superposition of configurations, d 4 (55%) and d 5 \( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle-}$}}{L} \) (45%).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. Buffat, G. Demazeau, M. Pouchard, et al., Acad. Sci. Ser. II 292, 509 (1981).
M. Takano, N. Nakanishi, Y. Takada, et al., Mater. Res. Bull. 12, 923 (1977).
M. Takano, S. Nasu, T. Abe, et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3267 (1991).
Y. Takeda, S. Naka, and M. Takano, J. Phys. 40, 331 (1979).
T. Takeda, S. Komura, and H. Fujii, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 31–34, 797 (1983).
J.-C. Grenier, N. Ea, and M. Pouchard, Mater. Res. Bull. 19, 1301 (1984).
S.-J. Kim, G. Demazeau, I. Presniakov, et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 123, 8127 (2001).
S.-J. Kim, G. Demazeau, I. Presniakov, et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 66, 014427 (2002).
I. Presniakov, G. Demazeau, A. Baranov, et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 71, 054409 (2005).
M. L. Medarde, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 1679 (1997).
A. W. Webb, K. H. Kim, and C. Bouldin, Solid State Commun. 79, 507 (1991).
J. H. Choy, D. K. Kim, S. H. Hwang, and G. Demazeau, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 50, 16631 (1994).
T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, N. Namatame, et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 57, 9550 (1998).
G. Demazeau, A. Baranov, G. Heymann, et al., Solid State Sci. 9, 376 (2007).
I. Presniakov, G. Demazeau, A. Baranov, et al., J. Solid State Chem. 180, 3253 (2007).
J. B. Goodenough, N. F. Mott, M. Pouchard, and G. Demazeau, Mater. Res. Bull. 8, 647 (1973).
H. Huppertz, Z. Kristallogr. 219, 330 (2004).
A. Wold, B. Post, and E. Banks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 4911 (1957).
G. Demazeau, C. Parent, M. Pouchard, and P. Hagenmuller, Mater. Res. Bull. 7, 913 (1972).
D. B. Currie and M. T. Weller, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 47, 696 (1991).
C. Weigl and K. J. Range, J. Alloys Comp. 200, L1 (1993).
F. Menil, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 46, 763 (1985).
F. Yill, Y. Gros, F. Hartmann-Bourton, et al., Hyperfine Interact. 93, 1705 (1994).
R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 32, 751 (1976).
J. Zaanen, G. A. Sawatzky, and J. W. Allen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 418 (1985).
G. Van der Laan, B. T. Thole, G. A. Sawatzky, et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 33, 4253 (1986).
Z. Hu, G. Kaindl, S. A. Warda, et al., Chem. Phys. 232, 63 (1998).
T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, T. Arima, et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 52, 13865 (1995).
T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, N. Namatame, et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 49, 7193 (1994).
R. Iczkowski and J. Margrave, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 3547 (1961).
R. Ingalls, A. Van der Woude, and G. A. Sawatzky, Mössbauer Isomer Shifts, Ed. by G. K. Shenoy and F. E. Wagner (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978).
A. E. Bocquet, A. Fujimori, T. Mizokawa, et al., Phys. Rev. B 45, 1561 (1992).
G. Demazeau, N. Chevreau, L. Fournus, et al., Rev. Chim. Miner. 20, 155 (1983).
V. S. Rusakov and D. A. Khramov, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys 56(7), 1118 (1992).
G. Martinez-Pinedo, P. Schwerdtfeger, E. Caurier, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 062701 (2001).
I. A. Presniakov, V. S. Rusakov, T. V. Gubaidulina, et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 76, 214407 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Original Russian Text © I.A. Presnyakov, V.S. Rusakov, A.V. Sobolev, G. Demazeau, A. V. Baranov, T.V. Gubaidulina, 2009, published in Zhurnal Neorganicheskoi Khimii, 2009, Vol. 54, No. 12, pp. 2039–2045.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Presnyakov, I.A., Rusakov, V.S., Sobolev, A.V. et al. Electronic state of the 57Fe probe atoms in perovskites LaMO3 (M = Ni, Cu). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 54, 1957–1963 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023609120195
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023609120195