Skip to main content
Log in

Length−Length and Length−Weight Relationships of Pacific Saury, Cololabis saira (Scomberesocidae), in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean

  • Published:
Journal of Ichthyology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is the first to record Pacific saury’s length–length relationships for converting various body length measurements from various fishing countries in the North Pacific Fisheries Commission. Also, we determined the length–weight relationship of the 2021 saury to compare with historical data. Neither age nor sex has a significant effect on the length–length and length–weight relationships. The length–length relationships were: fork length = 0.292 + 0.998 knob length (R2 = 0.999) and standard length = – 0.464 + 0.970 knob length (R2 = 0.986). The length–weight relationship was: body weight = 3.020 × 10–4 knob length3.788 (R2 = 0.894). The length–weight relationship comparison results indicate that saury has gotten thinner from 2004 to 2021.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arshad, A., Amin, S.M.N., Nuradiella, Y.L.Z., et al., Population characteristics of A. japonicus from the Kedah coastal waters of peninsular Malaysia, J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2012, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 162–172. https://doi.org/10.3923/jfas.2012.162.172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baitaliuk, A.A., Orlov, A.M., and Ermanov, Y.K., Characteristic features of ecology of the Pacific Saury Cololabis saira (Scomberesocidae, Beloniformes) in open waters and in the Northeast Pacific Ocean, J. Ichthyol., 2013, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0032945213110027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlander, K.D. and Smith, L.L., Some factors to consider in the choice between standard, fork, or total Lengths in fishery investigations, Copeia, 1945, vol. 1, pp. 7–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1438165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, A. and Fraser, K.P.P., Why does metabolism scale with temperature?, Funct. Ecol., 2004, vol. 18, pp. 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00841.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Falsone, F., Geraci, M.L., Scannella, D., et al., Length–weight relationships of 52 species from the South of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea), Fishes, 2022. vol. 7, no. 2, Article 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7020092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Froese, R., Cube law, condition factor, and weight–length relationships: History, meta-analysis, and recommendations, J. Appl. Ichthyol., 2006, vol. 22, no. 4. pp. 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuji, T., Satoshi, S., Hiroomi, M., et al., Seasonal length–weight relationships and weights at age of Pacific saury, 7th SSC PS meeting, NPFC-2021-SSC PS07-WP10, 2021. https://www.npfc.int/system/files/2021–09/NPFC–2021–SSC%20PS07–WP10%20Seasonal%20length-weight%20relationships%20and% 20weights%20at%20age.pdf.

  8. Glebov, I.I., Savinykh, V.F., and Baitaliuk, A.A., Subtropical migrants in the southwestern part of the Bering Sea, J. Ichthyol., 2010, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0032945210060020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, W.-B., Body length, weight, and condition factor of Pacific saury Cololabis saira from the landed size-classes of Taiwanese catch in comparison with Japanese statistics, J. Fish. Soc. Taiwan, 2007, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 361–368. https://doi.org/10.29822/JFST.200712.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, W.-B., Comparisons of monthly and geographical variations in abundance and size composition of Pacific saury between the high–seas and coastal fishing grounds in the northwestern Pacific, Fish. Sci., 2010, vol. 76, pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-009-0196-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahn, R.G., Pearson, D.E., and Dick, E.J., Comparison of standard length, fork length, and total length for measuring west coast marine fishes, Mar. Fish. Rev., 2004, vol. 66, pp. 31–33. http://hdl.handle.net/1834/26343

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura, K., The standard length of the pacific saury, Cololabis saira (Brevoort), Bull. Tohoku Reg. Fish. Res. Lab., 1956, vol. 7, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kosaka, S., Life history of the Pacific saury Cololabis saira in the northwest pacific and considerations on resource fluctuations based on it, Ibid., 2000, vol. 63, pp. 1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laevastu, T., Manual of methods in fisheries biology, Int. Sys. Agr. Sci. Tec., 1965, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Le Cren, E.D., The length–weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis), J. Anim. Ecol., 1951, vol. 20, pp. 201–219. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moutopoulos, D.K. and Stergiou, K.I., Length–weight and length–length relationships of fish species from Aegean Sea (Greece), J. Appl. Ichthyol., 2002, vol. 18, pp. 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021. https://www.R–project.org/.

  18. Ricker, W.E. and Carter, N.M., Handbook of Computations for Biological Statistics of Fish Populations, Ottawa: Queen’s Printer and Controller of Stationary, 1958, no. 119.

  19. Schneider, J.C., Laarman, P.W., and Gowing, H., Length–weight relationships, Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: With Periodic Updates, Fish. Spec. Rept., Schneider J.C., Ed., Michigan Dept. Nat. Res., 2000, vol. 25, pp. 1–18.

  20. Suyama, S., Formation period of the otolith hyaline zones of Pacific saury, Cololabis saira (Brevoort) in the western north Pacific Ocean, Bull. Tohoku Reg. Fish. Res. Lab., 2000, vol. 63, pp. 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tian, Y.J., Akamine, T., and Suda, M., Modeling the influence of oceanic-climatic changes on the dynamics of Pacific saury in the northwestern Pacific using a life cycle model, Fish. Oceanogr., 2004, vol. 13, pp. 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2419.2004.00314.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wootton, R.J., Ecology of Teleost Fishes, London: Chapman and Hall, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xing, Q., Haiqing, Y., Yang, L. et al., Application of a fish habitat model considering mesoscale oceanographic features in evaluating climatic impact on distribution and abundance of Pacific saury (Cololabis saira), Prog. Oceanogr., 2022, vol. 201, Article 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful to the Taiwan squid fishery association in Taiwan for assisting collection of the saury samples in the Kaohsiung Fishing Port in this study. The authors also wish to thank G.R. Elle for his comments on the manuscript and help with English writing. We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fisheries Agency, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, R.O.C (111 AS–6.4.1–FA–F6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W.-B. Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors state no conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Statement on the welfare of humans or animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ginting, K.P., Huang, WB. Length−Length and Length−Weight Relationships of Pacific Saury, Cololabis saira (Scomberesocidae), in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. J. Ichthyol. 63, 924–929 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945223050041

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945223050041

Keywords:

Navigation