Journal of Ichthyology

, Volume 57, Issue 6, pp 835–845 | Cite as

Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy of Luciobarbus barbulus (Heckel, 1847) (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)



Luciobarbus barbulus (Heckel, 1847), a cyprinid fish of the Persian Gulf basin is re-described. Its identity is discussed and its phylogenetic relationship among the tribe Barbini is reconstructed. Luciobarbus barbulus can be distinguished from its close species, L. pectoralis by having thicker lower lip, stronger last unbranched dorsal fin ray and with stronger serration, longer barbels and posterior barbel passes the middle of the eye (vs. not reaching the middle of the eye in L. pectoralis), confirming the identity of both, as distinct species. Moreover, phylogenetic analysis based on the mtCOI sequences, placed the sequenced L. barbulus in a distinct clade corresponding to the tribe Barbini which includes Aulopyge, Barbus and Luciobarbus (three genera from Eurasia and North of Africa), sister to L. pectoralis from Orontes River with genetic distance of 1.7% applying the Kimura 2 Parameter (K2P) model.


COI sequences freshwater fish Middle East biodiversity Luciobarbus pectoralis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almaça, C., Remarks on some Heckel’s species of Barbus from western Asia, Arq. Mus. Nac., B, 1983, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 95–102.Google Scholar
  2. Almaça, C., Notes on some species of western Palaearctic Barbus (Cyprinidae, Pisces), Arq. Mus. Nac., C, 1984a, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
  3. Almaça, C., Form relationships among western Palaearctic species of Barbus (Cyprinidae, Pisces), Arq. Mus. Nac., A, 1984b, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 207–248.Google Scholar
  4. Almaça, C., On some Barbus species from Western Asia (Cyprinidae, Pisces), Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, Ser. B, 1986, vol. 87, pp. 5–30.Google Scholar
  5. Almaça, C., Evolutionary, biogeographical, and taxonomical remarks on Mesopotamian species of Barbus s.s., Arq. Mus. Nac., Nova Ser., 1991, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
  6. Bănărescu, P.M. and Bogutskaya, N.G., The Freshwater Fishes of Europe, Vol. 5/II: Cyprinidae 2, Part II: Barbus, Wiebelsheim: Aula Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Banister, K.E., A revision of the large Barbus (Pisces: Cyprinidae) of East and Central Africa. Studies on African Cyprinidae Part II. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat., 1973, vol. 26, pp. 1–148.Google Scholar
  8. Berg, L.S., Ryby presnykh vod SSSR i sopredel’nykh stran (Freshwater Fishes of Soviet Union and Adjacent Countries), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1949, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  9. Bergsten, J., Bilton, D.T., Fujisawa, T., Elliott, M., Monaghan, M.T., Balke, M., Hendrich, L., Geijer, J., Her rmann, J., Foster, G.N., and Ribera, I., The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding, Syst Biol., 2012, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 851–869.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogutskaya, N.G. and Naseka, A.M., Katalog neschelyustnykh i ryb presnykh and solonovatykh vod Rossii (Catalogue of Agnatha Species and Fishes from Fresh and Brackish Waters of Russia), Moscow: KMK, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. Borkenhagen, K., A new genus and species of cyprinid fish (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) from the Arabian Peninsula, and its phylogenetic and zoogeographic affinities, Environ. Biol. Fish., 2014, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 1179–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borkenhagen, K. and Krupp, F., Taxonomic revision of the genus Carasobarbus Karaman, 1971 (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae), ZooKeys, 2013, no. 339, pp. 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boulenger, G.A., On some freshwater fishes from Smyrna, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, 1896, vol. 18, pp. 153–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boulenger, G.A., Catalogue of the Fresh-Water Fishes of Africa in the British Museum (Natural History), London: Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1911, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  15. Casal-Lopez, M., Perea, S., Yahyaoui, A., and Doadrio, I., Taxonomic review of the genus Luciobarbus Heckel, 1843 (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) from northwestern Morocco with the description of three new species, Graellsia, 2015, vol. 71, no. 2, p. e027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chenuil, A., Galtier, N. and Berrebi, P., A test of the hypothesis of an autopolyploid vs. allopolyploid origin for a tetraploid lineage: application for the genus Barbus, Heredity, 1999, vol. 82, pp. 373–380. doi 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Coad, B.W., Zoogeography of the fishes of the Tigris- Euphrates Basin, Zool. Middle East, 1996, vol. 13, pp. 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coad, B.W., Personal website. Accessed February 2017.Google Scholar
  19. Doadrio, I., Phylogenetic relationships and classification of western Palaearctic species of the genus Barbus (Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae), Aquat. Living Resour., 1990, vol. 3, pp. 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Durand, J.D., Tsigenopoulos, C.S., Unlu, E., and Berrebi, P., Phylogeny and biogeography of the family Cyprinidae in the Middle East inferred from cytochrome b DNA—evolutionary significance of this region, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2002, vol. 22, pp. 91–100. doi 10.1006/mpev.2001.1040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Eschmeyer, W.N. and Fong, J.D., Species by family/subfamily, in Catalog of Fishes, San Francisco: Calif. Acad. Sci., 2015.Google Scholar
  22. Esmaeili, H.R., Coad, B.W., Gholamifard, A., Nazari, N., and Teimory, A., Annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Iran, Zoosyst. Ross., 2010, vol. 19, pp. 361–386.Google Scholar
  23. Esmaeili, H.R., Teimori, A., Owfi, F., Abbasi, K., and Coad, B.W., Alien and invasive freshwater fish species in Iran: Diversity, environmental impacts and management, Iran. J. Ichthyol., 2014a, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 62–72.Google Scholar
  24. Esmaeili, H.R., Coad, B.W., Mehraban, H.R., Masoudi, M., Khaefi, R., Abbasi, K., Mostafavi, H., and Vatandoust, S., An updated checklist of fishes of the Caspian Sea basin of Iran with a note on their zoogeography, Iran. J. Ichthyol., 2014b, vol. 1, pp. 152–184.Google Scholar
  25. Esmaeili, H.R., Mehraban, H., Abbasi, K., Eagderi, S., Keivany, Y., and Coad, B., Review and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, distribution and conservation status, Iran. J. Ichthyol., 2017, vol. 4, suppl. 1, pp. 1–114.Google Scholar
  26. Galtier, N., Gouy, M., and Gautier, C., SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny, Comput. Appl. Biosci., 1996, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 543–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Geiger, M., Herder, F., Monaghan, M., Almada, V., Barbieri, R., Bariche, M., Berrebi, P., Bohlen, J., Casal-Lopez, M., Delmastro, G., Denys, G., Dettai, A., Doadrio, I., Kalogianni, E., Kärst, H., et al., Spatial heterogeneity in the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot affects barcoding accuracy of its freshwater fishes, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2014, vol. 14, pp. 1210–1221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Geldiay, R. and Balık, S., Türkiye Tatlısu Balıkları, Izmir: Ege Üniv. Ürünleri Fak. Yayınları, 1999, no. 16, p. 46.Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths, H.I., Schwalb, A., and Stevens, L.R., Environmental change in southwestern Iran: the Holocene ostracod fauna of Lake Mirabad, Holocene, 2001, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 757–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, T.A., BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 1999, vol. 41, pp. 95–98.Google Scholar
  31. Heckel, J.J., Naturhistorischer Anhang. Die Fische persiens, gesammelt von Theodor Kotschy, in Reisen in Europa, Asien und Afrika, mit Besonderer Beruecksichtigung auf Dienaturwissenschaflichen Verhaeltnisse der Betreffenden Länder, Unternommen in den Jahren 1835 bis 1841, Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbartsche Verlag, 1841, vol. 2, part 3, pp. 255–272.Google Scholar
  32. Heckel, J.J., Abbildungen und Beschreibungen der Fische Syriensnebsteinerneuen Classification und Characteristiksämmtlicher Gattungen der Cyprinen, Stuttgart., 1843.Google Scholar
  33. Howes, G.J., The phylogenetic position of the Yugoslavian cyprinid fish genus Aulopyge Heckel, 1841, with an appraisal of the genus Barbus Cuvier & Cloquet, 1816 and the subfamily Cyprininae, Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist., Zool., 1987, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 165–196.Google Scholar
  34. Ivanova, N.V., Zemlak, T.S., Hanner, R.H., and Hebert, P.D.N., Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2007, vol. 7, pp. 544–548. doi 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01748.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jouladeh-Roudbar, A., Vatandoust, S., Eagderi, S., Jafari-Kenari, S., and Mousavi-Sabet, H., Freshwater fishes of Iran; an updated checklist, AACL Bioflux, 2015, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 855–909.Google Scholar
  36. Karaman, M.S., Süßwasserfische der Türkei. 8. Teil. Revision der BarbenEuropas, Vorderasiens und Nordafrikas, Mitt. Hamb. Zool. Mus. Inst., 1971, vol. 67, pp. 175–254.Google Scholar
  37. Kottelat, M. and Freyhof, J., Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes, Cornol: Kottelat, 2007.Google Scholar
  38. Krupp, F., Systematik und Zoogeographie der Süßwasserfische des levantinischen Grabenbruchsystems und der Ostküste des Mittelmeeres, Dissertation Doktor der Naturwissenschaften, Mainz: Johannes Gutenberg-Univ. Mainz, 1985.Google Scholar
  39. Kuru, M., Recent systematic status of inland fishes of Turkey, GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2004, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  40. Levin, B.A., Freyhof, J., Lajbner, Z., Perea, S., Abdoli, A., Gaffaroğlu, M., Özuluğ, M., Rubenyan, H.R., Salnikov, V.B., and Doadrio, I., Phylogenetic relationships of the algae scraping cyprinid genus Capoeta (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2011, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 542–549. doi 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Machordom, A. and Doadrio, I., Evolutionary history and speciation modes in thecyprinid genus Barbus, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2001, vol. 268, pp. 1297–1306. doi 10.1098/rspb.2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson, J.S., Fishes of the World, New York: Wiley, 2016, 5th ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perdices, A., Carmona, J.A., Fernández-Delgado, C., and Doadrio, I., Nuclear and mitochondrial data reveal high genetic divergence among Atlantic and Mediterranean populations of the Iberian killifish Aphanius iberus (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae), Heredity, 2001, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 314–324. doi 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00888.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Poll, M. and Lambert, J., Barbus choutedeni, espéce nouvelle du sous genre, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 1961, vol. 64, pp. 265–271.Google Scholar
  45. Stamatakis, A., RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihoodbased phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models, Bioinformatics, 2006, vol. 22, pp. 2688–2690. Scholar
  46. Stiassny, M.L.J. and Sakharova, H., Review of the smiliogastrin cyprinids of the Kwilu River (Kasai Basin, central Africa), revised diagnosis for Clypeobarbus (Cyprinidae: Cyprininae: Smiliogastrini) and description of a new species, J. Fish. Biol., 2016, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1394–1412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tsigenopoulos, C.S. and Berrebi, P., Molecular phylogeny of north Mediterranean freshwater barbs (genus Barbus: Cyprinidae) inferred from cytochrome b sequences: biogeographic and systematic implications, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2000, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 165–179. doi 10.1006/mpev. 1999.0702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tsigenopoulos, C.S., Durand, J.D., Ünlü, E., and Berrebi, P., Rapid radiation of the Mediterranean Luciobarbus species (Cyprinidae) after the Messinian salinity crisis of the Mediterranean Sea, inferred from mitochondrial phylogenetic analysis, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2003, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsigenopoulos, C.S., Kasapidis, P., and Berrebi, P., Phylogenetic relationships of hexaploid large-sized barbs (genus Labeobarbus, Cyprinidae) based on mtDNA data, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2010, vol. 56, pp. 851–856. doi 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.02.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Turan, D., Ekmekçi, F.G., Ilhan, A., and Engin, S., Luciobarbus kottelati, a new species of barbel (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from the Büyük Menderes River, Turkey, with rediagnose of L. lydianus, Zootaxa, 2008, vol. 1824, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar
  51. Valiallahi, J., A revision of Barbus species of Iran (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae), PhD Thesis, Tehran: Univ. of Tarbiat Modares, 2000.Google Scholar
  52. Yang, L., Sado, T., Hirt, M.V., Pasco-Viel, E., Arunachalam, M., Li, J., Wang, X., Freyhof, J., Saitoh, K., Simons, A.M., and Miya, M., Phylogeny and polyploidy: resolving the classification of cyprinine fishes (Teleostei: Cypriniformes), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2015, vol. 85, pp. 97–116. doi 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.01.014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Lab., Department of Biology, College of SciencesShiraz UniversityShirazIran
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of SciencesShahid Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran
  3. 3.Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Palaeontology and GeobiologyMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations