Journal of Ichthyology

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 533–546 | Cite as

Microstructural characterization of the body key scale morphology in six Iranian endemic Aphanius species (Cyprinodontidae): Their taxonomic and evolutionary significance

  • A. TeimoriEmail author
  • M. Motamedi
  • N. Manizadeh


The microstructural characteristics of the body key scales were described for six Iranian endemic Aphanius Nardo, 1827 species. Among them, five species genetically belong to the “Iranian inland and inland-related Aphanius species, IIRAS” group, while A. ginaonis (Holly, 1929) belongs to the “brackish water species” group. General scale shape in the studied Aphanius species was cycloid with the exception of A. ginaonis, which has cycloid scales with few spinous-like structures present in the posterior edge of the scales. Considering phylogenetic relationships of the studied taxa, the most likely explanation for presence of the spinous scales in Aphanius species is the primary existence of these scales in this group. In addition, among the IIRAS group, the most different lepidont was recognized in scales of the A. isfahanensis Hrbek, Keivany and Coad, 2006 (pointed), which is similar to lepidonts in the A. ginaonis. The scales of these species are polygonal with similar typology. The similarity in lepidont morphology between A. ginaonis and A. isfahanensis can explained by (i) the primary existence of the rounded lepidont in this group, and (ii) since A. ginaonis and A. isfahanensis belong to two separate phylogenetic lineages, therefore, similarity in their lepidont morphology could be results of convergent evolution.


SEM Aphanius Cyprinodontiformes lepidont sexual behavior endemicity Iran 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agassiz, L., Recherches sur les Poissons Fossils, Neuchatel: Petitpierre, 1833–1843, vols. 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ba-Omar, A.T., Al-Azri, H., and Al-Adawi, K., Scanning electron microscopical study of the Aphanius dispar (Rüppell 1828) (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae) scales, Microsc. Microanal., 2013, vol. 19, pp. 116–117. doi 10.1017/S1431927613002572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bräger, Z., Scale analysis of Mediterranean Teleosts, PhD Thesis, Pécs: Univ. of Pécs, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Burdak, V.D., Morphologie fonctionnelle du tegument ecailleux des poissons, Cybium, 1986, vol. 10, pp. 1–147.Google Scholar
  5. Cadrin, S.X. and King, J., Cape cod yellowtail flounder, in Assessment of 20 Northeast Groundfish Stocks Through, Silver Spring, MD: Northeast Fish. Sci. Center, 2002, pp. 104–122.Google Scholar
  6. Chu, Y.T., Comparative studies on the scales and on the pharyngeal teeth in Chinese cyprinids, with particular reference to taxonomy and evolution, Biol. Bull. St. John’s Univ., 1935, vol. 2, pp. 1–225.Google Scholar
  7. Coad, B.W., A new species of tooth-carp, Aphanius mesopotamicus, from Iran and Iraq (Actinopterygii, Cyprinodontidae), Zookeys, 2009, vol. 31, pp. 149–163. 10.3897/zookeys.31.131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Lamater, E.D. and Courtenay, W.R., Jr., Studies on scale structure of flat fishes. I. The genus Trianectes, with notes on related forms, Proc. 27th Annual Conf. of the Southeastern Association of Game Fish Commissioners, Hot Springs, 1973, pp. 591–608.Google Scholar
  9. De Lamater, E.D. and Courtenay, W.R., Jr., Fish scale as seen by scanning electron microscopy, Biol. Sci., 1974, vol. 37, pp. 141–149.Google Scholar
  10. Edgar, R.C., MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput, Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, vol. 32, pp. 1792–1797. doi 10.1093/nar/gkh340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Esmaeili, H.R., Biology of an exotic fish, silver carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Val., 1844) from Gobindsagar Reservoir, Himachal Pradesh, India, PhD Thesis, Chandigarh: Panjab Univ., 2001.Google Scholar
  12. Esmaeili, H.R., Coad, B.W., Gholamifard, A., Nazari, N., and Teimori, A., Annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Iran, Zoosyst. Ross., 2010, vol. 19, pp. 361–386.Google Scholar
  13. Esmaeili, H.R. and Gholami, Z., Investigations on the surface ultrastructure of scale of Geno tooth-carp, Aphanius ginaonis (Holly, 1929) (Actinopterygii: Cyprinodontidae) using scanning electron microscope, Iran. J. Biol., 2007, vol. 20, pp. 307–314.Google Scholar
  14. Esmaeili, H.R. and Gholami, Z., Scanning electron microscopy of the scale morphology in Cyprinid fish Rutilus frisii kutum Kamenskii, 1901 (Actinopterygii: Cyprinodontidae), Iran. J. Biol., 2011, vol. 10, pp. 155–166.Google Scholar
  15. Esmaeili, H.R., Teimori, A., Gholami, Z., and Reichenbacher, B., Two new species of the tooth-carp Aphanius (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae) and the evolutionary history of the Iranian inland and inland-related Aphanius species, Zootaxa, 2014, vol. 3786, pp. 246–268. doi 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrito, V., Corsaro, M., and Tigano, C., Scale surface morphology in Lebias, Goldfuss, 1820 (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), J. Nat. Hist., 2003, vol. 37, pp. 1529–1534. 10.1080/00222930210126668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrito, V., Ippolito, S., and Tigano, C., Microanalisi delle scaglie in tre specie del genere Aphanius Nardo (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), 59u Congresso dell’Unione Zoologica Italiana, San Benedetto del Tronto, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. Ferrito, V., Pappulardo, A.M., Fruciano, C., and Tigano, C., Morphology of scale lepidonts in genus Aphanius (Teleostei: Caprinodontidae) using scanning electron microscopy, Ital. J. Zool., 2009, vol. 76, pp. 173–178. doi 10.1080/11250000802555684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrito, V., Tigano, C., and Corsaro, M., Comparative investigation on the microstructure of the scale in Lebias Goldfuss species (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), X European Congr. on Ichthyology, Prague, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Fraser, T.H., Comparative osteology of the shallow water cardinal fishes (Perciforrnes: Apogonidae) with reference to the systematics and evolution of the family, Ichthyol. Bull., 1972, vol. 34, pp. 1–105.Google Scholar
  21. Gholami, Z., Esmaeili, H.R., Erpenbeck, D., and Reichenbacher, B., Phylogenetic analysis of Aphanius from the endorheic Kor River Basin in the Zagros Mountains, Southwestern Iran (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Cyprinodontidae), J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2014, vol. 52, pp. 130–141. doi 10.1111/jzs.12052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gholami, Z., Teimori, A., Esmaeili, H.R., Schulz-Mirbach, T., and Reichenbacher, B., Scale surface microstructure and scale size in the tooth-carp genus Aphanius (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae) from endorheic basins in Southwest Iran, Zootaxa, 2013, vol. 3619, pp. 467–490. 10.11646/zootaxa.3619.4.5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gon, O., Scale ontogeny in the cardinal fish family Apogonidae, Zootaxa, 2016, vol. 4196, pp. 107–119. 10.11646/zootaxa.4196.1.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gouy, M., Guindon, S., and Gascuel, O., SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building, Mol. Biol. Evol., vol. 27, pp. 221–224. doi 10.1093/molbev/msp259Google Scholar
  25. Hanski, I.A. and Simberloff, D., The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation, in Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Hanski, I.A. and Gilpin, M.E., Eds., San Diego: Academic, 1997, pp. 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hrbek, T., Keivany, Y., and Coad, B.W., New species of Aphanius (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae) from Isfahan Province of Iran and a reanalysis of other Iranian species, Copeia, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 244–255. 10.1643/0045-8511(2006)6[244:NSOATC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hrbek, T. and Meyer, A., Closing of the Tethys Sea and the phylogeny of Eurasian killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Cyprinodontidae), J. Evol. Biol., 2003, vol. 16, pp. 7–26. doi 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00475.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hollander, R.R., Microanalysis of scales of poeciliid fishes, Copeia, 1986, vol. 1, pp. 86–91. doi 10.2307/1444892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes, D.R., Development and organization of the posterior field of ctenoid scales in the Platycephalidae, Copeia, 1981, vol. 1981, pp. 596–606. doi 10.2307/1444564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jawad, L.A., Comparative scale morphology and squamation patterns in triplefins (Pisces: Teleostei: Perciformes: Tripterygiidae), Tuhinga, 2005, vol. 16, pp. 137–167.Google Scholar
  31. Jawad, L.A. and Al-Jufaili, S.M., Scale morphology of greater lizardfish Saurida tumbil (Bloch, 1795) (Pisces: Synodontidae), J. Fish. Biol., 2007, vol. 70, pp. 1185–1212. doi 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01385.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johal, M.S., Esmaeili, H.R., and Sharma, M.L., Scale structure of a cobitid fish, Cobitis linea (Haeckel, 1849) using different modes of SEM, Curr. Sci., 2006, vol. 91, pp. 1444–1446.Google Scholar
  33. Kuusipalo, L., Scale morphology in Malawian cichlids, J. Fish. Biol., 1998, vol. 52, pp. 771–781. doi 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00819.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuusipalo, L., Evolutionary inferences from the scale morphology of Malawian cichlid fishes, Adv. Ecol. Res., 2000, vol. 31, pp. 377–397. 10.1016/S0065-2504(00)31020-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lagler, K.F., Lepidological studies 1. Scale characters of the families of Great Lake fishes, Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc., 1947, vol. 66, pp. 149–171. doi 10.2307/3223246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lippitsch, E., Scale morphology and squamation pattern in cichlids (Teleostei, Perciformes): A comparative study, J. Fish. Biol., 1990, vol. 37, pp. 265–291. doi 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05858.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lippitsch, E., A phyletic study on lacustrine haplochromine fishes (Perciformes, Cichlidae) of East Africa, based on scale and squamation characters, J. Fish. Biol., 1993, vol. 42, pp. 903–946. doi 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00399.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lippitsch, E., Scale and squamation character polarity and phyletic assessment in the family Cichlidae, J. Fish. Biol., 1995, vol. 47, pp. 91–106. doi 10.1111/j.1095-8649. 1995.tb01876.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCully, H.H., The comparative anatomy of the scales of serranid fishes, PhD Thesis, San Francisco: Stanford Univ., 1961.Google Scholar
  40. Mekkawy, I.A.A., Shehata, S.M.A., Saber, S.A., and Osman, A.G.M., Scale characteristics of five species of genus Epinephelus (Family Serranidae) from the Red Sea, Egypt, J. Egypt. Ger. Soc. Zool., 1999, vol. 30, pp. 71–102.Google Scholar
  41. Miranda, R. and Escala, M.C., Morphological and biometric comparison of the scales of the barbels (Barbus Cuvier) of Spain, J. Morphol., 2000, vol. 245, pp. 196–205. 10.1002/1097-4687(200009) 245:3<196::AID-JMOR2>3.0.CO;2-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Poulet, N., Berrebi, P., Crivelli, A.J., Lek, S., and Argillier, C., Genetic and morphometric variations in the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) of a fragmented delta, Arch. Hydrobiol., 2004, vol. 159, pp. 531–554. doi 10.1127/0003-9136/2004/0159-0531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Qu, Q., Sanchez, S., Blom, H., Tafforeau, P., and Ahlberg, P.E., Scales and tooth whorls of ancient fishes challenge distinction between external and oral ‘teeth,’ PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, p. e71890. Scholar
  44. Reichenbacher, B., Kamrani, E., Esmaeili, H.R., and Teimori, A., The endangered cyprinodont Aphanius ginaonis (Holly, 1929) from southern Iran is a valid species: evidence from otolith morphology, Environ. Biol. Fish., 2009, vol. 86, pp. 507–521. doi 10.1007/s10641-009-9549-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roberts, C.D., Comparative morphology of spined scales and their phylogenetic significance in the Teleostei, Bull. Mar. Sci., 1993, vol. 52, pp. 60–113.Google Scholar
  46. Rosen, D.E. and Bailey, R.M., The poeciliid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes), their structure, zoogeography, and systematics, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1963, vol. 126, pp. 1–176.Google Scholar
  47. Sire, J.K., Ontogenic development of surface ornamentation in the scales of Hemichromis bimaculatus (Cichlidae), J. Fish. Biol., 1986, vol. 28, pp. 713–724. doi 10.1111/j.1095- 8649.1986.tb05205.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sire, J.Y. and Arnulf, I., Structure and development of the ctenial spines on the scales of a teleost fish, the cichlid Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum, Acta Zool., 2000, vol. 81, pp. 139–158. doi 10.1046/j.1463-6395.2000.00042.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sire, J.Y., Donoghue, P.C., and Vickaryous, M.K., Origin and evolution of the integumentary skeleton in non-tetrapod vertebrates, J. Anat., 2009, vol. 214, pp. 409–440. doi 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01046.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Teimori, A., The evolutionary history and taxonomy of Aphanius (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae) species in Iran and the Persian Gulf region, PhD Thesis, Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians Univ., 2013.Google Scholar
  51. Teimori, A., Scanning electron microscopy of scale and body morphology as taxonomic characteristics of two closely related cyprinid species of genus Capoeta Valenciennes, 1842 in southern Iran, Curr. Sci., 2016, vol. 111, pp. 1214–1219. doi 10.18520/cs/v111/i7/1214-1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teimori, A., Esmaeili, H.R., Erpenbeck, D., and Reichenbacher, B., A new and unique species of the genus Aphanius (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae) from Southern Iran: a case of regressive evolution, Zool. Anz., 2014, vol. 253, pp. 327–337. 10.1016/j.jcz.2013.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Teimori, A., Esmaeili, H.R., and Gholamhosseini, A., The ichthyofauna of Kor and Helleh River Basins in southwest of Iran with references to taxonomic and zoogeographic features of native fishes, Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2010, vol. 6, pp. 1–8. doi 10.22067/ijab.v6i1.9152Google Scholar
  54. Teimori, A., Esmaeili, H.R., Gholami, Z., Zarei, N., and Reichenbacher, B., Aphanius arakensis, a new species of tooth-carp (Actinopterygii, Cyprinodontidae) from the endorheic Namak Lake basin in Iran, Zookeys, 2012a, vol. 215, pp. 55–76. doi 10.3897/zookeys.215.1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Teimori, A., Schulz-Mirbach, T., Esmaeili, H.R., and Reichenbacher, B., Geographical differentiation of Aphanius dispar (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae) from Southern Iran, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2012b, vol. 50, pp. 289–304. doi 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2012.00667.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tigano, C., Ferrito, V., Pappalardo, A.M., and Corsaro, M., Studio comparativo della microstruttura delle scaglie al SEM. Contributo alla filogenesi del genere Lebias, 34u Congresso S.I.B.M., Maggio 31–Giugno 6, 2003, Port al Kantaoui, 2003.Google Scholar
  57. Wiley, M.L. and Collette, B.B., Breeding tubercles and contact organs in fishes: their occurrence, structure, and significance, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1970, vol. 143, pp. 146–216.Google Scholar
  58. Williamson, W.C., Investigations into the structure and development of the scales and bones of fishes, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 1851, vol. 1851, pp. 643–702. Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of SciencesShahid Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran

Personalised recommendations