Journal of Ichthyology

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 373–382 | Cite as

Dietary preference and feeding ecology of Bloch’s gizzard shad, Nematalosa nasus

  • M. MukherjeeEmail author
  • V. R. Suresh
  • R. K. Manna
  • D. Panda
  • A. P. Sharma
  • M. K. Pati


Dietary preference and feeding ecology of Nematalosa nasus (Bloch 1795) in Chilika lagoon, India, was investigated through analysis of prey items in the guts and that in the habitat. Of the 230 taxa identified from the habitat in plankton samples from the lagoon, thirty five taxa were recorded from the guts of the fish. Index of Relative Importance showed 80% of the food comprised of microplankton groups viz. Foraminifera (35.79%), Chlorophyceae (20.52%), Bacillariophyaceae (12.30%), Cyanophyaceae (6.53%), other plant matter (3.65%) and Euglenophyaceae (0.76%). The fish is a generalized feeder on microplankton, with specialization on foraminiferans and Chlorophyaceae in Chilika Lagoon. Diet composition varied significantly with seasons. Prey type selectivity showed, preference to Gyrosigma sp. (αi—0.98, ei—0.85), Synedra sp. (αi—0.47, ei—0.71), Tabellaria sp. (αi—0.58, ei—0.47) and Ulothrix sp. (αi—0.06, ei—0.34) during monsoon and post-monsoonseason. Ammoniabeccariii—0.77 ei—0.98), Campylodiscus sp. (αi—0.04, ei—0.17) and Microspora sp. (αi—0.18, ei—0.76), were selected during pre-monsoon period, which is also the peak breeding period of the fish.


Nematalosa nasus dietary preference feeding ecology Chilika Lagoon 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Al-Dubakel, A.Y., Species structure of fishes in the Shatt Al-Basrah Canal and their feeding relationships, MSc Thesis, Basra, Iraq: Coll. Agric., Univ. Basrah, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Amundsen, P.A., Gabler, H.M., and Staldvik, F.J., A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data—modification of the Costello (1990) method, J. Fish Biol., 1996, vol. 4, pp. 607–614.Google Scholar
  3. Annandale, N. and Kemp, S., The fauna of Chilika Lake, Mem. Indian Mus., 1915, vol. 5, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  4. Atapattu, U.G.A.M.K.S.S. and Nissanka, C., Present status of fisheries in Rekawa Lagoon, Sri Lanka, in Proc. Third Science Symposium, Faculty of Science, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka, 2005, vol. 3, pp. 42–52.Google Scholar
  5. Balachandran, S., Rahmani, R.A., and Sathiyaselvam, P., Habitat evaluation of Chilika Lake with special reference to birds as bio-indicators, Government of Orissa, Bhubaneswra, 2005, pp. 1–140.Google Scholar
  6. Brooker, R.M., Jones, G.P., and Munday, P.L., Prey selectivity affects reproductive success of a corallivorous reef fish, Oecologia, 2012, vol. 17, pp. 409–416.Google Scholar
  7. Buddington, R.K. and Diamond, J.M., Aristotle revisited: The function of pyloric caeca in fish, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1986, vol. 83, pp. 8012–8014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Calbet, A., The trophic roles of micro zooplankton in marine systems, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2008, vol. 65, pp. 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calbet, A., and Landry, M.R., Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing and carbon recycling in marine systems, Limnol. Oceanogr., 2004, vol. 49, pp. 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CDA (Chilika Development Authority), Annual Report, 2011-12, 2012-13. Bhubaneswar, Odisha., 2013, Cited January 19, 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, C.H., Checklist of the Fishes of Penghu, FRI Spec. Publ., Taiwan: Fish. Res. Inst., 2004, no. 4.Google Scholar
  12. Chesson, J., Measuring preference in selective predation, Ecology, 1978, vol. 59, pp. 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesson, J., The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models, Ecology, 1983, vol. 64, pp. 1297–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N., PRIMER Version 6: User Manual/Tutorial PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. Conlu, P.V., Guide to Philippine flora and fauna, in Fishes, Quezon: Nat. Resour. Manage. Center, 1986, vol. 9.Google Scholar
  16. Costello, M.J., Predator feeding strategy and prey importance: a new graphical analysis, J. Fish. Biol., 1990, vol. 36, pp. 261–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniels, R.J.R., Freshwater Fishes of Peninsular India, Hyderabad: Cambridge Univ. Press India, 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Ferry, L.A. and Caillet, G.M., Sample size and data analysis: are we characterizing and comparing diet properly? in Proc. Symp. “Feeding Ecology and Nutrition in Fish,” MacKinlay, D. and Shearer, K., Eds., Vancouver: Am. Fish. Soc., 1996, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
  19. FishBase, Version 10/2015, Froese, R. and Pauly, D., Eds., 2015. http://www.fishbase.orgGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaughan, D.J. and Potter, I.C., Analysis of diet and feeding strategies within an assemblage of estuarine larval fish, Fish. Bull., 1997, vol. 95, pp. 722–731.Google Scholar
  21. Gerking, S.D., Feeding Ecology of Fish, New York: Academic, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. Gross, O., Ammonia beccarii, in World Foraminifera Database, 2014. Cited December 22, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. Hoggarth, D.D., Mees, C.C., O’Neill, C., Hindson, J. and Krishna, M., A Guide to Fish Stock Assessment Using the FMSP Tools, London: Mar. Res. Ass. Group, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Hussain, N.A., Naiama, A.K. and Al-Hassan, L.A.J., Annotated check list of the fish fauna of Khor Al-Zubair, north west of the Arabian Gulf, Iraq, Acta Ichthyol. Piscat., 1988, vol. 18, pp. 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hynes, H.B.N., The food of freshwater sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius) with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes, J. Anim. Ecol., 1950, vol. 19, pp. 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hyslop, E.J., Stomach content analysis: a review of methods and their applications, J. Fish Biol., 1980, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jayalakshmy, K.V. and Rao, K.K., Frequency distribution of Foraminifera in the Chilka Lake, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 2001, vol. 43, pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
  28. Jeyaseelan, M.J.P. and Krishnamurthy, K., Role of Mangrove forests of Pichavaram as Fish nurseries, Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad., 1980, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 48–53.Google Scholar
  29. Jhingran, V.G. and Natrajan, A.V., CIFRI, Reports on the Fisheries of the Chilika Lake (1957–1960), Bull. Central Inland Fish. Res. Inst., 1963, vol. 1, p. 50.Google Scholar
  30. Jobling, M., Environmental Biology of Fishes, London: Chapman and Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, S. and Sujansinghani, K.H., Fish and fisheries of the Chilka Lake with statistics of fish catches for the years 1948–1950, Indian J. Fish., 1954, vol. 1, pp. 256–344.Google Scholar
  32. Juanes, F., Buckel, J.A. and Scharf, F.S., Feeding ecology of piscivorous fishes, in Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries, Vol. 1: Fish Biology, Hart, P.J.B. and Reynolds, J.D., Eds., Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
  33. Kowtal, G.V., A note on the early development of “Balangi” Nematalosus nasus (Bloch) from the Chilka Lake, J. Inland Fish. Soc. India, 1970, vol. 2, pp. 155–158.Google Scholar
  34. Kowtal, G.V., Studies on the juvenile fish stock of Chilika Lake, Indian J. Fish., 1976, vol. 23, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
  35. Lévêque, C., Biodiversity Dynamics and Conservation: The Freshwater Fish of Tropical Africa, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  36. Lima-Junior, S.E. and Goitein, R., A new method for the analysis of fish stomach contents, Acta Scientiarum, 2001, vol. 23, pp. 421–424.Google Scholar
  37. Majeed, S.A., Biology of the gizzard shad Nematalosa nasus (Bloch, 1795) in Khawr Al-Zubair, South Iraq, MSc Thesis, Basra, Iraq: Univ. Basrah, Mar. Sci. Center, 1989.Google Scholar
  38. Manly, B.F.J., Miller, P. and Cook, L.M., Analysis of a selective predation experiment, Am. Nat., 1974, vol. 106, pp. 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshall, B.E., Seasonal and annual variations in the abundance of the clupeid Limnothrissa miodon in Lake Kivu, J. Fish Biol., 1991, vol. 39, pp. 641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, R.A., Hammerschlag, N., Collier, R.S., and Fallows, C., Predatory behavior of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) at Seal Island, South Africa, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 2005, vol. 85, pp. 1121–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohsin, A.K.M. and Ambak, M.A., Marine Fishes and Fisheries of Malaysia and Neighboring Countries, Serdang, Malaysia: Univ. Pertanian Malaysia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  42. Motta, P.J. and Wilga, C.D., Advances in the study of feeding behaviors, mechanisms, and mechanics of sharks, Environ. Biol. Fish., 2001, vol. 60, pp. 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muto, E.Y., Soares, L.S.H., and Goitein, R., Food resource utilization of the skates Rioraja agassizzi (Muller and Henle, 1841) and Psammobatis extent (Garman, 1913) on the continental shelf of Ubatuba, southeastern Brazil, Rev. Bras. Biol., 2001, vol. 61, pp. 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nelson, J.S., Fishes of the World, New York: Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar
  45. Newell, G.E. and Newell, R.C., Marine Plankton—A Practical Guide, London: Hutchinson, 1986.Google Scholar
  46. Ni, I.H. and Kwok, K.Y., Marine fish fauna in Hong Kong waters, Zool. Stud., 1999, vol. 38, pp. 130–152.Google Scholar
  47. Ostrander, G.K., The Laboratory Fish, San Diego: Academic, 2000.Google Scholar
  48. Parimala, S., Estuarine Gizzard Shad Nematalosa nasus (Bloch) without pelvic fins, Indian J. Fish., 1983, vol. 30, pp. 167–169.Google Scholar
  49. Patnaik, S., Observations of the seasonal fluctuation of plankton in the Chilika Lake, Indian J. Fish., 1971, vol. 20, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  50. Pauly, D., The Fishes and Their Ecology, in Small-Scale Fisheries of San Miguel Bay, Philippines: Biology and Stock Assessment, ICLARM Tech. Rep. no. 7, Pauly, D. and Mines, A.N., Eds., Manila, Philippines: Int. Center Living Aquat. Resour. Manage., 1982, pp. 15–33.Google Scholar
  51. Pepin, P. and Penney, R., Feeding by a larval fish community: impact on zooplankton, Mar. Ecol.: Progr. Ser., 2000, vol. 204, pp. 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pike, I.H. and Jackson, A., Fish oil: production and use now and in the future, Lipid Technol., 2010, vol. 2, pp. 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pinkas, L., Olipahnt, M.S. and Iverson, I.L.K., Food habits of albacore, blue fin tuna, and bonito in Californian waters, Calif. Dep. Fish Game Fish Bull., 1971, vol. 152, pp. 1–105.Google Scholar
  54. Prescott, G.W., Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area with an Illustrated Key to the Genera of Desmids and Freshwater Diatoms, Brown, W.C., Ed., Dubuque, 1961.Google Scholar
  55. Pinnegar, J.K., Trenkel, V.M., Dawson, W.A., Du Buit, M.H. and Tidd, A.N., Does diet in Celtic Sea fishes reflect prey availability? J. Fish Biol., 2003, vol. 23, pp. 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rajan, S., Pattanaik, S. and Bose, N.C., New records of fishes from Chilika Lake, J. Zool. Soc. India, 1968, vol. 20, pp. 80–83.Google Scholar
  57. Rama Rao, K.V., Pisces, in Wetland Ecosystem Series 1: Fauna of the Chilika Lake, Calcutta: Zool. Surv. India, 1995, pp. 367–389.Google Scholar
  58. Ramsar Advisory Mission, India, 2001, no. 50. Cited December 22, 2014.Google Scholar
  59. Rao, K.K., Jayalakshmy, K.V., Venugopal, P.T., Gopalakrishnan, C. and Rajagopal, M.D., Foraminifera from the Chilka Lake on the east coast of India, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 2000, vol. 42, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
  60. Riede, K., Global register of migratory species—from global to regional scales, in Final Report of the R and D-Project 808 05 081, Bonn: Fed. Agency Nat. Conserv, 2004.Google Scholar
  61. Safina, C. and Burger, J., Prey dynamics and the breeding phenology of common terns (Sterna hirundo), Auk, 1988, vol. 105, pp. 720–726.Google Scholar
  62. Sen, T.K., Commercial fishes of Calcutta and adjoining fish markets (economic aspects, scientific, local, and English names), Seafood Exp. J., 1987, vol. 19, pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
  63. Shoji, J. and Tanaka, M., Distribution, feeding condition and growth of Japanese Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus niphonius) larvae in the Seto Inland Sea, Fish. Bull., 2005, vol. 103, pp. 371–379.Google Scholar
  64. Simpfendorfer, C.A., Heupel, M.R., White, W.T. and Dulvy, N.K., The importance of research and public opinion to conservation management of sharks and rays: a synthesis, Mar. Freshwater Res., 2011, vol. 62, pp. 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Srichandan, S., Baliarsingh, S.K., Panigrahy, R.C., and Sahu, K.C., A case study on summer distribution of zooplankton in Chilika Lagoon, east coast of India, Int. J. Life Sci. Tech., 2012, vol. 5, pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
  66. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, DC: Am. Publ. Health Assoc., Am. Water Works Assoc., Water Environ. Fed., 2005.Google Scholar
  67. Stergiou, K.I. and Karpouzi, V.S., Feeding habits and trophic levels of Mediterranean fish, Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 2002, vol. 11, pp. 217–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taher, M.M., Specialization, trophic breadth and diet overlap of thirteen small marine fish species from Shatt Al-Basrah Canal, Southern Iraq, Marsh Bull., 2010, vol. 5, pp. 118–130.Google Scholar
  69. Talwar, P.K. and Kacker, R.K., Commercial Sea Fishes of India, Calcutta: Zool. Surv. India, 1984.Google Scholar
  70. Tomas, C.R., Identifying Marine Phytoplankton, San Diego, CA: Academic, 1997.Google Scholar
  71. Ward, H.B. and Whipple, G.C., Freshwater Biology, New York: Wiley, 1959, pp. 589–596.Google Scholar
  72. Wetherbee, B.M. and Cortés, E., Food consumption and feeding habits, in Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives, Carrier, J.C., Musick, J.A., and Heithaus, M.R., Eds., Bocca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004, pp. 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whitehead, P.J.P., FAO Species Catalogue, Vol. 1: Clupeoid Fishes of the World (Suborder Clupeioidei). An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of the Herring, Sardines, Pilchards, Sprats, Shads, Anchovies, and Wolf-Herring, Part 1: Chirocentridae Clupeidae and Pristigaste, FAO Fish. Syn., Rome: Food Agric. Org., 1985, vol. 125, pp. 1–303.Google Scholar
  74. Windsor, M.L., Fish Meal, Department of Trade and Industry Torry Research, Torry Adv. Note no. 49, 2001.Google Scholar
  75. Winemiller, K.O., Agostinho, A.A., and Caramaschi, E.P., Fish ecology, in Tropical Stream Ecology, Dudgeon, D., Eds., San Diego: Academic, 2008, pp. 107–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Mukherjee
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. R. Suresh
    • 1
  • R. K. Manna
    • 1
  • D. Panda
    • 1
  • A. P. Sharma
    • 1
  • M. K. Pati
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Inland Fisheries Research InstituteBarrackpore, Kolkata, West BengalIndia
  2. 2.Vidyasagar UniversityMidnapore, West BengalIndia

Personalised recommendations