Abstract
The influence of the shape anisotropy on the field dependences of double electromagnetic-acoustic conversion in samples of an Invar alloy 29NK in the high-temperature range below the Curie point is experementally studied. It is shown that at a constant temperature the value of the polarizing field in which a jumplike generation of ultrasound occurs is determined by the demagnetizing factor of the sample, and the observed anomaly of the electromagnetic-acoustic conversion is caused by the kink effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. S. Il’yasov and V. V. Merzlyakov, “Electromagnetic-Acoustic Transformation of Spatial Waves in the Paraprocess Range. II. Relationships near the Curie Point,” Defektoskopiya, No. 9, 52–60 (1992).
A. F. Maskaev and S. Yu. Gurevich, “Electomagnetic Excitation and Recording of Ultrasound in Chromium Steel,” Defektoskopiya, No. 4, 106–108 (1979).
V. A. Komarov, “Electromagnetic-to-Acoustic Conversion near the Curie Point,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 80(1), 17–26 (1995) [Phys. Met. Metallogr. 80 (1), 10–16 (1995)].
I. K. Kamilov and Kh. K. Aliev, “Second-Order Phase Transitions in Ferromagnetic Materials in Weak Fields near the Curie Point,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk 140(8), 639–670 (1983) [Sov. Phys. Usp. 26(8), 696 (1983)].
V. I. Chechernikov, Magnetic Measurements (Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].
K. P. Belov, Magnetic Transformations (Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1959; Consultants Bureau, New York, 1961).
Proc. Int. Conf. on Phase Transitions and Nonlinear Effects in Condensed Media and IV Int. Sem. on the Physics of Magnetic Phase Transitions (Makhachkala, 2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Original Russian Text © M.A. Borovkova, R.S. Il’yasov, N.V. Fedorova, 2010, published in Fizika Metallov i Metallovedenie, 2010, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 383–386.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borovkova, M.A., Il’yasov, R.S. & Fedorova, N.V. Kink effect upon the electromagnetic generation of ultrasound in isotropic ferromagnets. Phys. Metals Metallogr. 109, 354–357 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X10040071
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X10040071