Skip to main content
Log in

Crystallogeometric analysis of the orientation relationship between austenite, Widmanstätten carbides, and martensite in carbon steels

  • Structure, Phase Transformations, and Diffusion
  • Published:
The Physics of Metals and Metallography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The common orientation relationships (OR) between austenite, Widmanstätten carbides (WC), and martensite have been studied as a function of the type of the WC/austenite OR (Pitsch, Thompson, or Sleeswyk OR). It has been established that only two of twelve possible OR versions, which are close to the known Bagaryatskii OR, are realized between the WC and martensite upon the martensitic transformation and are observed experimentally. The causes for the realization of these two versions observed upon the experimental investigation of high-carbon steels are discussed with allowance for the specific crystallographic features of the WC/austenite interphase interface structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Pitsch, “Die kristallographischen Eigenschaften der Zementitausscheidung im Austenit,” Arch. Eisen 34, 381–390 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Howe and G. Spanos, “Interfacial Steps and Growth Mechanism in Ferrous Pearlites,” Philos. Mag. A 79(1), 9–30 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Spanos and H. I. Aaronson, “Morphology, Crystallography and Mechanism of Sympathetic Nucleation of Proeutectoid Cementite Plates,” Scr. Metall. 22, 1537–1542 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. M. Schastlivtsev, I. L. Yakovleva, L. E. Kar’kina, et al., “Analysis of Orientation Relationships between Austenite, Widmanstätten Carbides, and Martensite in High-Carbon 150G4 Steel after Isothermal γ → α Transformation” (in press).

  5. S. W. Tompson and P. R. Howell, “The Orientation Relationship between Intragranularly Nucleated Widmanstätten Cementite and Austenite in a Commercial Hypereutectoid Steel,” Scr. Metall. 21, 1353–1357 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. W. Tompson and P. R. Howell, “A Preliminary Comparison of Two Apparently Diverse Cementite/Austenite Orientation Relationships,” Scr. Metall. 22, 229–233 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. V. Kurdyumov, L. M. Utevskii, and R. I. Entin, Transformations in Iron and Steel (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. R. Kuteliya, “On Crystal-Geometrical Relationships of Austenite and Cementite Lattices,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 28(5), 853–857 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. E. R. Kuteliya, “Selected-Area Electron-Diffraction Investigation of Crystal-Geometrical Relationships of Phases in Bainite,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 28(1), 129–137 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. S. Zhou and G. J. Shiflet, “Interfacial Steps and Growth Mechanism in Ferrous Pearlites,” Metall. Trans. A 22, 1349–1365 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. S. Zhou and G. J. Shiflet, “A New Orientation Relationship between Austenite and Cementite in An Fe-C-Mn Steel,” Scr. Metall. A 27, 1215–1218 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. W. Sleeswyk, “The Crystallography of the Austenite-Cementite Transformation,” Philos. Mag. 13, 1223–1236 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. I. Izotov and P. F. Khandarov, “Classification of Martensitic Structures in Iron Alloys,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 34(2), 332–338 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Umomoto, E. Yoshitake, and I. Tamura, “The Morphology of Martensite in Fe-C, Fe-Ni-C Alloys,” J. Mater. Sci. 18(10), 2893–2904 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. I. Izotov, “Morphology and Crystal Geometry of Lath (Massive) Martensite,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 34(1), 123–132 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Smirnov, V. M. Schastlivtsev, and L. G. Zhuravlev, Fundamentals of Heat Treatment of Steel (OOO “Nauka i Tekhnologiya”, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. J. Petch, “The Orientation Relationships between Cementite and α-Iron,” Acta Crystallogr. 6, 96–97 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu. A. Bagaryatskii, “Probbable Mechanism of Martensite Decomposition,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 73(6), 1161–1164 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. I. V. Isaichev, “Orientation of Cementite in Tempered Steel,” Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 17(6), 835–838 (1947).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. W. Andrews, D. J. Dyson, and S. R. Keown, Interpretation of Electron Diffraction Patterns (McMillan, London, 1968; Mir, Moscow, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.G. Kabanova, L.E. Kar’kina, I.L. Yakovleva, V.M. Schastlivtsev, 2007, published in Fizika Metallov i Metallovedenie, 2007, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 201–210.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kabanova, I.G., Kar’kina, L.E., Yakovleva, I.L. et al. Crystallogeometric analysis of the orientation relationship between austenite, Widmanstätten carbides, and martensite in carbon steels. Phys. Metals Metallogr. 103, 195–204 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X07020093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X07020093

PACS numbers

Navigation