Skip to main content
Log in

On the origin of essential differences in the coercive force, remanence, and initial permeability of ferromagnetic steels in the loaded and unloaded states upon plastic tension

  • Electrical and Magnetic Properties
  • Published:
The Physics of Metals and Metallography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavior of remanence M r, initial permeability μ, and coercive force H c of the steels during their plastic tension in both loaded and unloaded states upon “slow” and “rapid” loading is explained from a unified point of view. It is shown that (1) a sharp (severalfold) decrease in M r and μ and a similar abrupt increase in H c are caused by the same effect, namely the appearance of high residual compressive stresses in most grains along the force direction; (2) in the loaded state, M r and μ slowly decrease and H c similarly slowly increases with increasing degree of deformation ε due to a common effect of increasing dislocation density ρ with increasing ε; (3) the values of M r, μ, and H c in the transition region, in which ε ≤ εcr, substantially differ from each other upon “slow” and “rapid” loadings; (4) at ε ≥ εcr, the dependences of the M r, μ, and H c parameters on ε both in the loaded and unloaded states are parallel to each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. G. Kuleev and E. S. Gorkunov, “Mechanisms of the Effect of Internal and External Stresses on the Coercive Force of Ferromagnetic Steels,” Defektoskopiya, No. 11, 3–18 (1997).

  2. V. G. Kuleev, G. V. Bida, and L. V. Atangulova, “Feasibility of NDT of Ferromagnetic Steel Structures Based on Measurements of Residual Magnetization as a Function of Elastic Stress,” Defektoskopiya, No. 12, 7–20 (2000) [Rus. J. Nondestr. Testing 36 (12), 866–876 (2000)].

  3. V. G. Kuleev and L. V. Atangulova, “Effect of Elastic Stresses on the Reversible Susceptibility of Ferromagnetic Steels in Various Magnetic States,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 87(5), 52–57 (1999) [Phys. Met. Metallogr. 87, 409–414 (1999)].

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Chikasumi, Physics of Ferromagnetism. Magnetic Characteristics and Engineering Application (Syokabo, Tokyo, 1984; Mir, Moscow, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Wohlfarth, “Effect of Residual Stresses,” in Steel Behavior upon Cyclic Loading, pp. 243–279 (Metallurgiya, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. L. Bernshtein and V. A. Zaimovskii, Structure and Mechanical Properties of Metals (Metallurgiya, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. N. Malinin, Applied Theory of Plasticity and Creep (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1968) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. N. Khristenko and V. V. Krivova, “Effect of Plastic Deformation on the Coercive Force of Low-Carbon Steels,” Defektoskopiya, No. 6, 90–92 (1984).

  9. S. M. Tompson and B. K. Tanner, “The Magnetic Properties of Specially Prepared Pearlitic Steels of Varying Carbon Content as a Function of Plastic Deformation,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 132, 71–88 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Langman, R., “Magnetic Properties of Mildsteel under Conditions of Biaxial Stress,” IEEE Trans. Magn. 26 (4), 1246–1251 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Ya. Bezlyud’ko, V. F. Muzhitskii, and B. E. Popov, “Magnetic Control of the Stress-Strain State and Residual Reserve of Steel Structures,” Zavod. Lab. 65(9), 53–57 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. T. Orekhov, “A Relation of Magnetoelastic Effect with Stresses and Deformations upon Plane-Strain State,” Defektoskopiya, No. 3, 100–105 (1975).

  13. V. A. Zakharov, M. A. Borovkova, V. A. Komarov, et al., “Effect of External Stresses on the Coercive Force of Carbon Steels,” Defektoskopiya, No. 1, 41–46 (1992).

  14. V. G. Kuleev, T. P. Tsar’kova, and A. P. Nichipuruk, “Specific Features of the Behavior of the Coercive Force in Low-Carbon Plastically Deformed Steels,” Defektoskopiya, No. 5, 24–39 (2005) [Rus. J. of Nondestructive Testing 41 (5), 285–295 (2005)].

  15. R. Dawson and D. G. Moffat, “Vibratory Steels Relief: A Fundamental Study of Its Effectiveness,” J. Eng. Mater. Techn. 102, 1–9 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. N. Goshchitskii and A. Z. Menshikov, Neutron News 7, 12 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. M. Rietveld, “A Profile Refinement Method of Nuclear and Magnetic Structure,” J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 65–71 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, “Recent Advances in Magnetic Structure Determination by Neutron Powder Diffraction,” Physica B 192, 55–69 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.G. Kuleev, T.P. Tsar’kova, A.P. Nichipuruk, V.I. Voronin, I.F. Berger, 2007, published in Fizika Metallov i Metallovedenie, 2007, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 136–146.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuleev, V.G., Tsar’kova, T.P., Nichipuruk, A.P. et al. On the origin of essential differences in the coercive force, remanence, and initial permeability of ferromagnetic steels in the loaded and unloaded states upon plastic tension. Phys. Metals Metallogr. 103, 131–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X07020032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X07020032

PACS numbers

Navigation