Skip to main content
Log in

Internal Morphology of Some Species of the Genus Rhagasostoma Koschinsky (Cheilostomata, Bryozoa) from a Campanian Erratic Block of Belarus

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The internal structure of three species of the genus Rhagasostoma Koschinsky (family Onychocellidae)—R. inelegans (Lonsdale), R. gibbosum (Marsson), and R. rowei (Brydone), originating from the Campanian erratic block of Belarus, was studied. It was found that, in general, all three species have a similar internal structure: the formation of new lineal series of autozooids initiated from the avicularia, the cystids of the zooids narrow towards the basal walls, and the transverse walls of the zooids are located at an angle to the basal walls. The species R. inelegans and R. gibbosum, in contrast to R. rowei, have muscle scars in the distolateral part of the basal wall of autozooids. In the transverse walls of autozooids, R. inelegans and R. gibbosum have one large septulum, while R. rowei has a pair of small septula enclosed in a pore chamber. The comparison of the studied onychocellid species with the type species of the genus Tobolocella Koromyslova et al., as well as with the species of the genus Acoscinopleura Voigt (family Coscinopleuridae) revealed significant differences in their internal structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Barskov, I.S. and Weiss, A.F., The microstructure of rostra in the Upper Cretaceous belemnitellids (Coleoidea, Cephalopoda), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1987, vol. 294, no. 4, pp. 963–965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brydone, R.M., Further notes on the stratigraphy and fauna of the Trimingham Chalk, Geol. Mag., 1906, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brydone, R.M., Further Notes on New or Imperfectly Known Chalk Polyzoa. Pt. 2, London: Dulau and Co., 1930, pp. 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Favorskaya, T.A., Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po makrofaune Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii. Mshanki mezokainozoya (A Practical Handbook on the Macrofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories: Meso-Cenozoic Bryozoans), St. Petersburg: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst., 1996.

  5. Koromyslova, A.V., Morphological features and systematic position of the bryozoans Onychocella rowei and O. mimosa (Cheilostomata) from a Campanian erratic block (Belarus), Paleontol. J., 2014, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koromyslova, A.V. and Pakhnevich, A.V., New species of Pachydermopora Gordon, 2002 and Beisselina Canu, 1913 (Bryozoa: Cheilostomida) from a Campanian erratic block (Belarus) and their micro-CT investigation, Paleontol. J., 2016, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koromyslova, A.V., Taylor, P.D., Martha, S.O., and Riley, M., Rhagasostoma (Bryozoa) from the Late Cretaceous of Eurasia: Taxonomic revision, stratigraphy, and palaeobiogeography, Europ. J. Taxon., 2018a, vol. 490, pp. 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koromyslova, A.V., Martha, S.O., and Pakhnevich, A.V., The internal morphology of Acoscinopleura Voigt, 1956 (Cheilostomata, Bryozoa) from the Campanian–Maastrichtian of Central and Eastern Europe, Paläont. Z., 2018b, vol. 92, pp. 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koromyslova, A.V., Pakhnevich, A.V., and Fedorov, P.V., Tobolocella levinae n. gen., n. sp., a cheilostome bryozoan from the late Maastrichtian of northern Kazakhstan: scanning electron microscope and micro-CT study, N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 2019, vol. 294, pp. 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koromyslova, A.V., Taylor, P.D., and Pakhnevich, A.V., Early Maastrichtian erect bryozoans from western Kazakhstan, with descriptions of two new species and the comparative internal morphology of some cheilostome genera, N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 2021, vol. 302, pp. 235–262.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lidgard, S., Zooid and colony growth in encrusting cheilostome bryozoans, Palaeontology, 1985, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 255–291.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Medd, A.W., On the musculature of some Cretaceous membranimorph polyzoa, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.: Ser. 13, 1964, vol. 7, Iss. 75, pp. 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ostrovsky, A.N., Evolution of Sexual Reproduction in Marine Invertebrates: Example of Gymnolaemate Bryozoans, Springer Verlag: Dordrecht, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosso, A., Gerovasileiou, V., and Di Martino, E., Really Onychocellids? revisions and new findings increase the astonishing bryozoan diversity of the Mediterranean Sea, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 2020, vol. 8, no. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110904

  15. Ryland, J.S., Bryozoans, London: Hutchinson Univ. Library, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schubert, T., Parallele Merkmalsentwicklung der Bryozoen Arten von Woodipora Jullien 1888 im Coniacium bis Maastrichtium NW-Europas, Geol. Jb. Reihe A, 1986, no. 98, pp. 3–83.

  17. Taylor, P.D., Bryozoa, in Fossils of the Chalk, 2nd ed., Smith, A.B. and Batten, D.J., Eds., London: Palaeontol. Assoc., 2002, pp. 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor, P.D., Martha, S.O., and Gordon, D.P., Synopsis of ‘onychocellid’ cheilostome bryozoan genera, J. Nat. Hist., 2018, vol. 52, pp. 1657–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Viskova, L.A., New finds of Late Cretaceous stenolaematous bryozoans with a closed type of growth, Paleontol. J., 2000, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 606–612.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Viskova, L.A., Idmoneiform Tubuliporina (Bryozoa, Stenolaemata): morphological features, problems in systematics, and new taxa, Paleontol. J., 2004, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Voigt, E., Morphologische und stratigraphische Untersuchungen über die Bryozoenfauna der oberen Kreide. I. Teil. Die cheilostomen Bryozoen der jüngeren Oberkreide in Nordwestdeutschland, im Baltikum und in Holland, Leopoldina: Ber. Kaiser.-Deutsch. Akad. Naturforsch. Halle, 1930, no. 6, pp. 379–579.

  22. Voigt, E., Untersuchungen über Coscinopleura Marss. (Bryoz. foss.) und verwandte Gattungen, Mitt. Geol. Staat. Hamburg. 1956, vol. 25, pp. 26–75.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Voigt, E., Revision der von F. v. Hagenow 1838–1850 aus der Schreibkreide von Rügen veröffentlichten Bryozoen, Geologie, 1959, vol. 8, no. 25, pp. 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Voigt, E., Oberkreide Bryozoen aus den asiatischen Gebieten der UdSSR, Mitt. Geol. Staat. Hamburg, 1967, vol. 36, pp. 5–95.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Voigt, E., Bryozoen aus dem Campan von Misburg bei Hannover, Ber. Naturhist. Ges. Hannover, 1975, no. 119, pp. 235–277.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-05-00245 A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. V. Koromyslova or A. V. Pakhnevich.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by D. Voroshchuk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koromyslova, A.V., Pakhnevich, A.V. Internal Morphology of Some Species of the Genus Rhagasostoma Koschinsky (Cheilostomata, Bryozoa) from a Campanian Erratic Block of Belarus. Paleontol. J. 56, 741–751 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030122070073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030122070073

Keywords:

Navigation