Skip to main content
Log in

Taxonomic Composition of Gastropods from the Mandrikovka Beds of the Upper Eocene of Ukraine: Species List

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of long-term collecting and investigation by the author of the composition of Upper Eocene gastropods from the Mandrikovka Beds in the vicinity of Dnepr (former Dnepropetrovsk) are generalized in the form of table. The mollusk assemblage from these beds exceeds in richness and preservation all other Paleogene assemblages of the former USSR. Gastropod assemblages from two main localities of the Mandrikovka Beds, the village of Mandrikovka and Rybalsky granite quarry, are compared. The collection of the Rybalsky assemblage is divided by years to examine features of their distribution in enclosing deposits. The last assemblage is richer, with the considerable prevalence of small-sized species obtained by washing in sieves. This method of collecting is the main cause of a greater diversity of this assemblage. However, large species, which only occur in one locality, are also present. The extremely rich Paleogene fauna from these strata undoubtedly needs further revision. The table contains the data on the revision of particular groups, including that performed by the author; references to published figures; comparisons with the species names in the monograph of Klucznikov (1958). The text provides comparisons with the richest Eocene assemblages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Alexeiev, A.K., Paleogenovaya fauna mollyuskov Severnogo Priaral’ya (Paleogene Mollusk Fauna of the Northern Aral Region), Erevan: Akad. Nauk Arm. SSR, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amitrov, O.V., Late Eocene–Early Miocene turrids from the southern USSR, Transactions of the Paleontological Institute, 1973, vol. 135, pp. 1–212.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amitrov, O.V., Paleogene architectonicids (Gastropoda) from the southern USSR, Paleontol. Zh., 1978, no. 4, pp. 49–66.

  4. Amitrov, O.V., On the extent of completeness of faunal assemblages, in Osadochnaya obolochka Zemli v prostranstve i vremeni (Sedimentary Envelope of the Earth in Space and Time), Moscow: Nauka, 1989, pp. 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amitrov, O.V., History of gastropods of the Paleogene seas of Western Eurasia, Tr. Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1993, vol. 254, pp. 1–208.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amitrov, O.V., Scissurellids (Gastropoda, Scissurellidae) from the Upper Eocene of Ukraine, Ruthenica, 1996, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amitrov, O.V., Mandrikovka Beds (Upper Eocene of Ukraine): State of the study of gastropods, with description of a new species of Conorbis, Paleontol. J., 2008, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 581–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amitrov, O.V., Epitoniidae (Gastropoda,) from the Late Eocene of Kazakhstan and Ukraine, Paleontol. Zh., 2013, no. 4, pp. 20–27.

  9. Amitrov, O.V. and Zhegallo, E.A., On the protoconchs of Ukrainian Eocene Scissurellidae (Gastropoda), Ruthenica, 1998, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amitrov, O.V., Zhegallo E.A. Triphorids (Gastropoda: Triphoridae) from the Upper Eocene of Ukraine, Paleontol. Zh., 2007, no. 4, pp. 25–34.

  11. Bellardi, L., Monografia delie pleurotome fossili del piemonte, Mem. Roy. Acad. Sei. Torino Ser. 2, 1847, vol. 9, pp. 1–122.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Belokrys, L.S., The bivalved gastropod Berthelinia from the Eocene of Ukraine, Paleontol. J., 1994, vol. 28, no. 1a, pp. 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Belokrys, L.S., Eocene Caecidae of Ukraine (biometric research), Paleontol. Zh., 1997a, no. 3, pp. 30–38.

  14. Belokrys, L.S., Pteropod gastropods of the Ukrainian Eocene, Paleontol. Zh., 1997b, no. 4, pp. 14–21.

  15. Belokrys, L.S., Small-sized Vermetidae (Gastropoda) from the Mandrikovka Beds, Paleontol. Zh., 1999, no. 5, pp. 34–40.

  16. Belokrys, L.S., Opercula of gastropods from the Upper Eocene of Ukraine, Paleontol. Zh., 2000, no. 1, pp. 6–14.

  17. Berezovsky, A.A., Upper Eocene bivalves from Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine: Nuculida and Arcida, Paleontol. J., 2015, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 987–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beyrich, E., Zur Kenntnis des tertiären Bodens der Mark Brandenburg, Arch. Mineral. Geognosie, Bergau Huttenkunde (Karsten’s Arch.), 1848, vol. 22, pp. 3–102.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beyrich, E., Die Conchylien des norddeutschen Tertiärgebirges, Z. Deutsch. Geol. Gesell., 1853–1856: 1853, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 273–358; 1854, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 408–500; vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 726–781; 1856, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–88.

  20. Boettger, O., Beitrag zur palaeontologischen und geologischen Kenntnis der Tertiärformation in Hessen: Inagural-Dissertation der Philosophischen Fakultät zu Würzburg, Offenbach am Main: Kohler and Teller, 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bosquet, J., Recherches paldontologiques sur le terrain tertiaire du Limbourg Néerlandais, Verhandel. K. Akad. Wet., 1859, vol. 7, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boussac, J., Etudes paléontologiques sur le Nummulitique Alpin, Mem. Servir Explication Carte Geol. Détaillée France, Paris, 1911, pp. 1–437.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Brongniart, A., Mémoire sur lesterrains de sediment supériuers calcaréo-trapéens du Vicentin et sur quelques terrains d’Italie, de France, d’Allemagne etc., qui peuvent se rapporter à la même époque, Paris, 1823.

  24. Coquebert de Montbret, R. and Brongniart, A., Extrait d’un mémoire sur la formation de la Coquille de Strombus fissurella et sur deux espèces analogues à celle-ci, Bull. Soc. Philomatique, a Ses Corresp., 1793, no. 25, pp. 1–2.

  25. Cossmann, M., Catalogue illustrée des coquilles de l’Éocène des environs de Paris, Ann. Soc. Roy. Malacol. Belg., 1888, vol. 23, pp. 3–324.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Deshayes, G.P., Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris, vol. 2: Gasteropodes, Paris, 1824–1837.

  27. Deshayes, G.P., Description des animaux sans vertèbres décoiverts dans le bassin de Paris pour servir de supplément, Paris, 1864–1866, vol. 3.

  28. Dixon, F., The Geology of Sussex or the Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex, London, 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D’Orbigny, A., Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés, Paris, 1852a, vol. 2, p. 427.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D’Orbigny, A., Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés, Paris, 1852b, vol. 3, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Edwards, P.E., A monograph of the Eocene Mollusca or descriptions of shells from the older Tertiaries of England Monogr. Paleontogr. Soc. London, 1856, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 200–240; 1860, no. 5, pp. 241–330.

  32. Fehse, D., Contributions to the knowledge of the Pediculariidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Cypraeoidea): 2. On the occurrence of the genus Eotrivia Schilder, 1924 in the Ukraine Eocene, with the description of a new species, Cainozoic Res., 2011, vol. 8, nos. 1–2, pp. 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Giebel, C., Die Fauna der Braunkohlenformation von Latdorf bei Bernburg, Abh. Naturforsch. Ges. Halle, 1864, vol. 8, pp. 1–205.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Glibert, M. and Heinzelin, J., de, L’Oligocène inférieur belge, Mém. Inst. Royal Sci. Natur. Belgique, vol. jubilaire Victor Van Straelen, Bruxelles, 1954, vol. 2, pp. 281–438.

  35. Goldfuss, A., Petrefacta Germaniae, Düsseldorf. 1841–1844, vol. 3: 1841, pp. 1–20; 1844, pp. 21–128.

  36. Golikov, A.N. and Starobogatov, Ya.I., Question of phylogeny and systems of prosibranch gastropods, Tr. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1988, vol. 187 (Systematics and Fauna of Gastropods, Bivalves, and Cephalopods), pp. 4–77.

  37. Gurov, A.V., Geologicheskoe opisanie Poltavskoi gubernii (Geological Description of the Poltava Region), Kharkov: Poltav. Gub. Zemstvo, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hébert, E., Notice sur les fossiles tertiaires du Limbourg et sur ceux de la couche à Ostrea cyathula Lamarck du Bassin de Paris, Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr., 1849, ser. 2, vol. 6, pp. 459–472.

  39. Klucznikov, M.N., Nizhnetretichnye otlozheniya platformennoi chasti Ukrainskoi SSR (Lower Tertiary Deposits of the Platform Part of the Ukrainian SSR), Kiev: Akad. Nauk Ukr. SSR, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Klucznikov, M.N., Stratigraphy and fauna of the Lower Tertiary deposits of Ukraine, Tr. Inst. Geol. Nauk Akad. Nauk Ukr. SSR. Ser. Stratigr. Paleontol., 1958, vol. 13, pp. 1–549.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Koenen, A., Die Fauna der unter-oligocänen Tertiärschichten von Helmstädt bei Braunschweig, Z. Dtsch. Geol. Gesell., 1865, vol. 12, pp. 459–534.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Koenen, A., Das marine Mittel-Oligocan Norddeutschlands (Système Rupelien, Dumont; étage Tongrien, K. Mayer und seine Mollusken-Fauna: 1. Gastropoda, Palaeontographica, 1867, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 53–127.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Koenen, A., Das norddeutsche Unter-Oligocän und seine Mollusken-Fauna, Abh. Geol. Specialkarte Preuss. Thuring. Staaten, 1889, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–280; 1890, no. 2, pp. 281–574; 1891, no. 3, pp. 575–818; 1894, pp. 1393–1458.

  44. Koenen, A., Ueber südrussisches Unter-Oligocän, Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Geol., Paläontol., 1892, vol. 2, pp. 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koninck, L., Description des coquilles fossiles d’Argile de Basele, Boom, Scheie, Nouv. Mem. Acad. Roy. Belgique, 1837, vol. 11, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Korobkov, I.A., Class Gastropoda, in Atlas rukovodyashchikh form iskopaemykh faun SSSR (Atlas of Index Forms of Fossil Faunas of the USSR), vol. 12: Paleogen (Paleogene), Moscow: Gosgeoltekhizdat, 1949, pp. 231–269.

  47. Korobkov, I.A., Spravochnik i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo po tretichnym mollyuskam: Bryukhonogie (Guide and Methodical Manual on Tertiary Mollusks: Gastropods), Leningrad: Gostoptekhizdat, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lamarck, J.B., Mémoires sur les fossiles des environs de Paris, Ann. Mus. Hist. Natur., 1802–1806, pp. 1–244.

  49. Lamarck, J.B., Sur l’Ethérie, nouveau genre de coquille bivalve de la famille des Camacées, Ann. Mus. Hist. Natur., 1807, vol. 10, pp. 398–408.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Michajlovsky, G.P., On some new and rare shells from the Tertiary deposits of the northern coast of the Aral Sea, Protok. O-va Estestvoispyt. Yur’ev. Univ., 1912, vol. 21, nos. 1–2, pp. 120–138.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Michelotti, G., Études sur le Miocène inférieur de l’Italie septentrionale, Natuurk. Verhand. Hollandsche Maatsch. Wetensch. Haarlem, 1861, vol. 2, no. 15 (2), pp. 1–183.

  52. Morlet, L., Description d’ungenre nouveau de mollusques fossils de la famille des Ringiculidae, J. Conchol., 1888, vol. 36, pp. 329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Newton, R.B., Systematic List of the Frederick E. Edwards Collection of British Oligocene and Eocene Mollusca in the British Museum (Natural History), London, 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nyst, P.H., Liste des coquilles des Argiles de Boom, Basele, Schelle, Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr., 1843, vol. 14, pp. 451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nyst, P.H., Description des coquilles et des polipiers fossiles des terrains tertiaires de la Belgique, Mém. Cour. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belles Lettr. Belgique, 1844, vol. 17, pp. 1–675.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Philippi, R.A., Verzeichniss der in der Gegend von Magdeburg aufgefundenen Tertiärversteinerungen, Palaeontographica, 1846, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Philippi, R.A., Verzeichniss der in der Gegend von Magdeburg aufgefundenen Tertiärversteinerungen, Palaeontographica, 1847, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 45–90.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sandberger, F., Die Conchylien des Mainzer Tertiärbeckens (Wiesbaden) Berlin, 1863.

  59. Schauroth, C., Verzeichniss der Versteinerungen im Herzogl, in Naturalienkabinet zu Coburg. Coburg: Dietz’sche Hofbuchdruckerei, 1865, pp. 1–327.

  60. Schlotheim, E.F., Die Petrefactenkunde auf ihrem jetztigen Standpunkte durch die Beschreibung seiner Sammlung versteinerter und fossiler Überreste des Thier- und Pflanzen-reichs der Vorwelt, Gotha: Becker’schen Buchhandlung, 1820.

  61. Semper, O., Additions on genre Scissurella, J. Conchol., 1865a, vol. 13, pp. 283–289.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Semper, O., Du genre Mathilda, J. Conchol., 1865b, vol. 13, pp. 328–341.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sokolov, N.A., Mollusk fauna from Mandrikovka, Tr. Geol. Kom. Nov. Ser., 1905, vol. 18, pp. 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Solander, D.C., in Brander, G., Fossilia Hantoniensia or Hampshire Fossils Collected and in the British Museum Deposited, London, 1766.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wenz, W., Gastropoda: Part 4. Prosobranchia, in Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Berlin: Zehlendorf, 1940, pp. 721–960.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wrigley, A., A Lutetian fauna at Southampton docks, Proc. Geol. Ass., 1934, vol. 45, pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Amitrov.

Additional information

Translated by G. Rautian

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amitrov, O.V. Taxonomic Composition of Gastropods from the Mandrikovka Beds of the Upper Eocene of Ukraine: Species List. Paleontol. J. 52, 1292–1333 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030118110023

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030118110023

Keywords:

Navigation