Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some Aspects of the Brachiopod–Brachiopod Relationships

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The brachiopod–brachiopod relationships are analyzed for the first time based on the original material and literary data. The oppression of brachiopods by each other in the dense settlement is considered as amensalism. The only type of brachiopod relationships that may be considered as parasitism are brachiopod settlements within each other’s shells. The through growing of spines and pedicle rhizoids into the brachiopod–host shell, immurement and weighting of shells in druses is considered as pseudoparasitism. New terms “endopseudoparasitism” and “ectopseudoparasitism” are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Afanasjeva, G.A., Cases of bilateral symmetry breaking in brachiopods, Morfogenez v individual’nom i istoricheskom razvitii: simmetriya i asimmetriya (Morphogenesis in Individual and Historical Development: Symmetry and Asymmetry), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2013, pp. 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angiolini, L., Campagna, M., Borlenghi, L., Grunt, T., Vachard, D., Vezzoli, G., Vuolo, I., Worthington, J., Nicora, A., and Zanchi, A., Brachiopods from the Cisuralian–Guadalupian of Darvaz, Tajikistan and implications for Permian stratigraphic correlations, Palaeoworld (2016). http://dx.doi.org/ doi 10.1016/j.palwor.2016.05.006

  3. Biologicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ (Biological Encyclopedic Dictionary), Gilyarov, M.S, Ed., Moscow: Sov. Entsikl., 1995.

  4. Bromley, R.G. and Surlyk, F., Borings produced by brachiopod pedicles, fossil and Recent, Lethaia, 1973, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, G.A. and Grant, R.E., Permian Brachiopods of West Texas III: (Part 2—Plates), Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiol., no. 19, City of Washington: Smithson. Inst. Press, 1975, pp. 1299–1921.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dedyu, I.I., Ekologicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ (Ecological Encyclopedic Dictionary), Kishinev: Gl. Red. Mold. Sov. Entsikl., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Filatova, Z.A., Quantitative census of the benthic fauna in the southwestern part of the Barents Sea Kolichestvennyi uchet donnoi fauny yugo-zapadnoi chasti Barentseva morya, Tr. Polyarn. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Morsk. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr. (PINRO), 1938, no. 2, pp. 3–58.

  8. Gilbert, S.F., Ecological developmental biology: environmental signals for normal animal development, Evol. Devel., 2012, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivanov, A.P., A contribution to the systematics and biology of the genus Spirifer and some brachiopods CII and CIII of the Moscow Province, Byull. Mosk. Ob-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1925, vol. 3, nos. 1–2, pp. 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ivanova, E.A., Usloviya sushchestvovaniya, obraz zhizni i usloviya razvitiya nekotorykh brakhiopod srednego i verkhnego karbona Podmoskovnoi kotloviny (Living Conditions, Life Habits, and Developmental History of Some Brachiopods from the Middle–Upper Carboniferous of the Moscow Syneclise), Tr. Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 21, Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lazăr, I., Panaiotu, C.E., Grigore, D., Sandy, M.R., and Peckmann, J., An unusual brachiopod assemblage in a Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) stromatactis mud-mound of the Eastern Carpathians (Hăghimaş Mountains), Romania, Facies, 2011, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 627–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pakhnevich, A.V., Izmenchivost’ i populyatsionnaya ekologiya brakhiopod: Izmenchivost’ rakovin i razmerno-vozrastnoi sostav populyatsii vysokoshirotnykh brakhiopod Severnogo polushariya (Variability and Population Ecology of Brachiopods: Variability of Shells and Size–Age Composition of Populations of High Latitude Brachiopods of the Northern Hemisphere), Saarbrücken: Lambert Acad. Publ., 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pietsch, T.W., Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes), Ichthyol. Res., 2005, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 207–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson, J.R., Ecology of articulated brachiopods, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H: Brachiopoda, Revised, Kaesler, R. L., Ed., Boulder CO–Lawrence KS: Geol. Soc. Am.–Univ. Kansas Press, 1997, vol. 1, pp. 441–462.

  15. Roger, J. and Fatton, E., Les organismes perforantes, Trav. Lab. Paléontol. Univ. Paris-Sud. Orsay, 1968, pp. 13–53.

  16. Santos, A., Mayoral, E., Villas, E., Herrera, Z., and Ortega, G., First record of Podichnus in orthide brachiopods from the Lower Ordovician (Tremadocian) of NW Argentina and its relation to the early use of an ethological strategy, Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2014, vol. 399, no. 1, pp. 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schemm-Gregory, M. and Sutton, M., First report of brachiopod–brachiopod endoparasitism, Lethaia, 2010, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 112–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sparks, D., Hoare, R.D., and Kesling, R.V., Epizoans on the Brachiopod Paraspirifer bownockeri (Stewart) from the Middle Devonian of Ohio, Pap. Paleontol., no. 23, Ann Arbor MI: Mus. Paleontol., Univ. Michigan, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taddei Ruggiero, E. and Bitner, M.A., Bioerosion on brachiopod shells—a Cenozoic perspective, Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 2008 (2007), vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 369–378.

  20. Vortsepneva, E., Tzetlin, A., Purschke, G., Mugue, N., Haß-Cordes, E., and Zhadan, A., The parasitic polychaete known as Asetocalamyzas laonicola (Calamyzidae) is in fact the dwarf male of the spionid Scolelepis laonicola (comb. nov.), Invertebr. Biol., 2008, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zezina, O.N., Ekologiya i rasprostranenie sovremennykh brakhiopod (Ecology and Distribution of Recent Brachiopoda), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhuravlev, V.S. and Pakhnevich, A.V., Representatives of the Superfamily Richthofenioidea (Brachiopoda: Productida) from the Gundara Formation (Permian) of Darvaz, PALEOSTRAT-2016. Godichn. sobr. (nauch. konfer.) sektsii paleontol. MOIP i Mosk. otdel. Paleontol. ob-va pri RAN. Moskva, 26–28 yanvarya 2016 g. Tez. dokl. (PALEOSTRAT-2016: Annual Meeting (Scientific Conference) of the Paleontological Section of the Moscow Society of Naturalists and the Moscow Division of the Paleontological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, January 26–28, 2016), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2016, pp. 32–33.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117647, Moscow, Russia

    V. S. Zhuravlev & A. V. Pakhnevich

Authors
  1. V. S. Zhuravlev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Pakhnevich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Pakhnevich.

Additional information

Translated by A. Madison

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuravlev, V.S., Pakhnevich, A.V. Some Aspects of the Brachiopod–Brachiopod Relationships. Paleontol. J. 52, 497–505 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030118050155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030118050155

Keywords:

Search

Navigation