Paleontological Journal

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 623–634 | Cite as

Revision of non-passeriform birds from Polgárdi (Hungary, Late Miocene): 2. Galliformes

Article

Abstract

A taxonomic revision of Galliformes (Aves) from the Upper Miocene of Polgárdi has confirmed the presence of five taxa. A large pheasant originally described as Pavo aesculapi phasianoides Jánossy, 1991 is referred to the genus Syrmaticus as a valid species, S. phasianoides (Jánossy, 1991), comb. nov. Small phasianids are represented in Polgárdi by four taxa: Mioryaba magyarica gen. et sp. nov., Eurobambusicola turolicus gen. et sp. nov., Plioperdix hungarica (Jánossy, 1991), and a form similar in size to Mioryaba magyarica, but having a more primitive structure of the tarsometatarsus and carpometacarpus.

Keywords

Aves Phasianidae Miocene Neogene Central Europe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballmann, P., Die Vögel aus der althurgidalen Spaltenfüllung von Wintershof (West) bei Eichstätt in Bayern, Zitteliana, 1969, vol. 1, pp. 5–60.Google Scholar
  2. Bedetti, C. and Pavia, M., Early Pleistocene birds from Pirro Nord (Puglia, southern Italy), Palaeontogr. Abt. A., 2013, vol. 298, pp. 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bochen-ski, Z. and Kurochkin, E.N., New data on Pliocene phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Moldavia and S. Ukraine, Acta Zool. Cracov., 1987, vol. 30, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
  4. Göhlich, U.B. and Mourer-Chauviré, C., Revision of the phasianids (Aves: Galliformes) from the Lower Miocene of Saint-Gerand-Le-Puy (Allier, France), Palaeontology, 2005, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1331–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Göhlich, U.B. and Pavia, M., A new species of Palaeortyx (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae) from the Neogene of Gargano, Italy, Oryctos, 2008, vol. 7, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
  6. Jánossy, D., Late Miocene bird remains from Polgárdi (W-Hungary), Aquila, 1991, vol. 98, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
  7. Kessler, E., New results with regard to the Neogene and Quaternary avifauna of the Carpathian Basin: Part II, Földt. Közl., 2009, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 251–271.Google Scholar
  8. Kessler, J., A Kárpát-medence madárvilágának slénytani kézikönyv, Könyvmühel: Miskolc, 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Kurochkin, E.N., Birds of Central Asia in the Pliocene, Tr. Sovm. Sovet.–Mongol. Paleontol. Eksped., 1985, vol. 26, pp. 1–119.Google Scholar
  10. Mayr, G., Variations in the hypotarsus morphology of birds and their evolutionary significance, Acta Zool., 2016, vol. 97, pp. 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mlíkovský, J., Cenozoic Birds of the World: Part 1. Europe, Praha: Ninox Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Mourer-Chauviré, C., The Galliformes (Aves) from the Phosphorites du Quercy (France): Systematics and biostratigraphy, Natur. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Cty. Sci. Ser., 1992, no. 36, pp. 67–95.Google Scholar
  13. Mourer-Chauviré, C. and Geraads, D., The Upper Pliocene avifauna of Ahl al Oughlam, Morocco: Systematics and biogeography, Rec. Austral. Mus., 2010, vol. 62, pp. 157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pavia, M. and Bedetti, C., Early Pleistocene fossil birds from Cava Sud, Soave (Verona, North-Eastern Italy), Paleornithol. Res., 2013, vol. OO (Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Göhlich, U.B. and Kroh, A., Eds.), 2013, pp. 171–183.Google Scholar
  15. Pavia, M., Göhlich, U.B., and Mourer-Chauviré, C., Description of the type-series of Palaeocryptonyx donnezani Depéret, 1892 (Aves: Phasianidae) with the selection of a lectotype, C. R. Palevol., 2012, vol. 11, pp. 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sánchez Marco, A., New Iberian Galliformes and reappraisal of some Pliocene and Pleistocene Eurasian taxa, J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 2009, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1148–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zelenkov, N.V., Phylogenetic analysis of some Neogene phasianid genera (Aves: Phasianidae), Paleontol. J., 2009, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 438–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zelenkov, N.V., Revision of non-passeriform birds from Polgárdi (Hungary, Late Miocene): 1. Anseriformes, Paleontol. J., 2016, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Neogene phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 1. Genus Tologuica gen. nov., Paleontol. J., 2009a, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Neogene phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 2. Genera Perdix, Plioperdix, and Bantamyx, Paleontol. J., 2009b, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 318–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Neogene phasianids (Aves: Phasianidae) of Central Asia: 3. Genera Lophogallus gen. nov. and Syrmaticus, Paleontol. J., 2010, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zelenkov, N.V. and Kurochkin, E.N., Class Aves, in Iskopaemye pozvonochnye Rossii I sopredelnykh territoryi. Iskopaemye reptilii i ptitsy. Chast’ 3 (Fossil Vertebrates of Russia and Adjacent Countries: Fossil Reptiles and Birds: Part 3), Kurochkin, E.N., Lopatin, A.V., and Zelenkov, N.V., Eds., Moscow: GEOS, 2015, pp. 86–290.Google Scholar
  23. Zelenkov, N.V. and Panteleyev, A.V., Three bird taxa (Aves: Anatidae, Phasianidae, Scolopacidae) from the Late Miocene of the Sea of Azov (southwestern Russia), Paläontol. Z., 2015, vol. 89, pp. 515–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Borissiak Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations