Abstract
Every aspect of biological orderliness is a result of evolution, which expresses the systemic reorganization of organismal body plan, along with the way of its ontogenetic formation. Phyletic changes in the developmental rates (heterochronies) experienced by the organism or its structures exemplify just a kind of such consequences. The current belief that heterochronies are the causes of evolutionary events is based on the assumption that evolution of ontogeny proceeds in the same way as the ontogeny itself, i.e., from a germ cell to adult state. This premise (termed here “the central dogma”) is the cornerstone of traditional ideas of the evolutionary mechanism, regardless of whether it is perceived in terms of gene mutations or “embryonic modes.” In fact, the directions of two transformations compared are opposite each other. An evolutionary change in the body plan results from reorganization of the developmental system, which comes in response to disturbance of stability of the system’s terminal (adult) state. Realized by selection, this change starts immediately from the terminal state and then spreads in generations towards early ontogenetic stages. Heterochronies show just the same dynamics of events irrespective of whether they reflect the acceleration or delay of development. Empirically, such course of evolutionary changes was grounded most evidently by Severtsov in the early version of his concept of the phylembryogenesis. The theoretical basis of the same regularity is provided by the Schmalhausen–Waddington’s theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberch, P., Ontogenesis and morphological diversification, Am. Zool., 1980, vol. 20, pp. 653–667.
Alberch, P., Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences, Syst. Zool., 1985, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 46–58.
Alberch, P., Gould, S., Oster, G., and Wake, D., Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny, Paleobiology, 1979, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 296–317.
Balfour, F.M., Address to the Department of Anatomy and Physiology of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, in The works of F.M. Balfour, Foster, M. and Sedgwick, A., Eds., London: Macmillan, 1885, vol. 1, pp. 698–713.
de Beer, G., Embryos and Ancestors, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.
Berg, L.S., Patterns in the formation of organic forms, in L.S. Berg. Trudy po teorii evolyutsii. 1922-1930 (L.S. Berg: Works on the Evolutionary Theory, 1922–1930), Leningrad: Nauka, 1977, pp. 312–387.
Conklin, E.C., The organization of cell-lineage of the ascidian egg, J. Acad. Natur. Sci. Philad., 1905, vol. 13, pp. 1–119.
Cope, E.D., The Origin of the Fittest, New York: McMillan, 1887.
Cope, E.D., The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution, Chicago: Open Court Publ. Co., 1904.
Darwin, Ch., Proiskhozhdenie vidov putem estestvennogo otbora (The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection), Moscow: Sel’khozgiz, 1952.
Darwin, F. and Seward, A.S., More Letters of Charles Darwin, London: John Murray, 1903, vol. 1.
Dobzhansky, Th., Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution, Am. Biol. Teacher., 1973, vol. 35, pp. 125–129.
Driesch, H., The Science and Philosophy of the Organism, London: Black, 1908, vols. 1 and 2.
Garstang, W., The theory of recapitulation: A critical restatement of the biogenetic law, J. Linn. Soc. Zool., 1922, vol. 35, pp. 81–101.
Garstang, W., The morphology of the Tunicata, and its bearing on the phylogeny of the Chordata, Quart. J. Microscop. Sci., 1928, vol. 75, pp. 51–187.
Gould, S.J., Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1977.
Gould, S.J., The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 2002.
Haeckel, E., Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1866, vol. 1.
Haeckel, E., Die Gastrula und die Eifurchung der Thiere, Jena. Z. Naturwiss., 1875, vol. 9, pp. 404–508.
Haldane, J.B.S., The time of action of genes, and its bearing on some evolutionary problems, Am. Natur., 1932, vol. 66, pp. 5–24.
Hall, B.K., Evolutionary Developmental Biology, 2nd ed., Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1998.
Hyatt, A., The agreement between the different periods in the life of the individual shell and the collective life of the tetrabranchiate cephalopods, Proc. Boston Soc. Natur. Hist., 1866, vol. 10, pp. 302–303.
Jägersten, G., Evolution of the Metazoan Life Cycle, London: Acad. Press, 1972.
McKinney, M.L., Heterochrony: Beyond words, Paleobiology, 1999, vol. 25, pp. 149–153.
McKinney, M.L. and McNamara, K.J., Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny, New York: Plenum Press, 1991.
McNamara, K.J., Inside evolution: 1992 presidential address, J. Roy. Soc. W. Austral., 1993, vol. 76, pp. 3–12.
McNamara, K.J. and McKinney, M.L., Heterochrony, disparity, and macroevolution, Paleobiology, 2005, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 17–26.
Mehnert, E., Biomechanik, erschlossen aus den Prinzipien der Organogenese, Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1898.
Müller, F., Witness for Darwin, in F. Myuller, E. Gekkel’. Osnovnoi biogeneticheskii zakon (F. Müller, E. Haeckel: The Main Biogenetic Law), Schmalhausen, I.I, Ed., Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940, pp. 61–166.
Raff, R.A., The Shape of Life, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1996.
Raff, R. and Kaufman, T., Embriony, geny i evolyutsiya (Embryos, Genes, and Evolution: The DevelopmentalGenetic Basis of Evolutionary Change), Moscow: Mir, 1986 [New York–London: Macmillan Publ. Co, 1983].
Reilly, S.M., Wiley, E.O., and Meinhardt, D.J., An integrative approach to heterochrony: The distinction between interspecific and intraspecific phenomena, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 1997, vol. 60, pp. 119–143.
Rice, S.H., The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: When a change in size or shape is not heterochrony, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, pp. 907–912.
Roux, W., Gesammelte Abhandlungen über Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, Leipzig: Engelmann, 1896, vols. 1 and 2.
Schmalhausen, I.I., Puti i zakonomernosti evolyutsionnogo protsessa (Pathways and Patterns of the Evolutionary Process), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940.
Schmalhausen, I.I., Organizm kak tseloe v individual’nom i istoricheskom razvitii (Organism As a Whole in Individual and Historical Development), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.
Severtsov, A.N., Etyudy po teorii evolyutsii (Etudes on the Evolutionary Theory), Berlin: Gosizdat RSFSR, 1922.
Severtsov, A.N., Morfologicheskie zakonomernosti evolyutsii (Morphological Patterns of Evolution), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1939.
Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary patterns of ontogeny, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1981, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 38–54.
Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and natural selection, Ontogenez, 1984, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–136.
Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary patterns of ontogeny, in Sovremennaya Paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Menner, V.V. and Makridin, V.P., Eds., Moscow: Nedra, 1988, vol. 2, pp. 169–209.
Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and lessons of evolutionism, Ontogenez, 2006, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 179–198.
Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary theory and scientific thinking, Paleontol. Zh., 2010, no. 6, pp. 3–17.
Shishkin, M.A., Historical changes in ontogeny as evidence of system transformation (on the question of the nature of heterochronies), in Morfogenez v individual’nom i istoricheskom razvitii: geterokhronii, geterotopii i allometriya (Morphogenesis in Individual and Historical Development: Heterochronies, Heterotopies, and Allometry), Moscow: Inst. Biol. Razvit. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014, pp. 46–49.
Smith, K.K., Heterochrony revisited: The evolution of developmental sequences, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2001, vol. 73, pp. 169–186.
Smith, K.K., Sequence heterochrony and the evolution of development, J. Morphol., 2002, vol. 252, pp. 82–97.
Stebbins, G.L., Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1974.
Waddington, C.H., The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion on Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology, London: Allen and Unwin, 1957.
Wake, D., Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic data, Geobios (Mém. Spéc.), 1989, no. 12, pp. 369–378.
Webster, M. and Zelditch, M.L., Evolutionary modifications of ontogeny: Heterochrony and beyond, Paleobiology, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 354–372.
Zelditch, M.L., Beyond Heterochrony: The Evolution of Development, New York: Wiley–Liss, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © M.A. Shishkin, 2016, published in Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 2016, No. 2, pp. 11–25.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shishkin, M.A. Evolution of ontogeny and nature of heterochronies. Paleontol. J. 50, 117–130 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030116020076
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030116020076