Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary theory: The current state

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern problems for the theory of evolution in Russia are only partly related to domestic realities (a legacy of the 1990s, changing priorities of education, and the clericalization of the society). The main drawback comes from the acceptance of a physicalist paradigm, in which testing evolutionary hypotheses is reduced to testing predictions derived from processes working at lower levels. Hypotheses are no longer tested by direct observation of the real world, which has somehow ceased to be regarded as a source of proof. Instead, hypotheses are thought to be correct if they are supported by more readily understood patterns at lower (molecular or genetic) levels. This substitution may explain the poor support for the epigenetic theory of evolution, although it agrees with observations much better than the currently dominant theoretical concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agadjanian, A.K., Genosystematics and morphogenesis of mammals, in Morfogenez v individual’nom i istoricheskom razvitii (Morphogenesis in Individual and Historical Development), Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2011, pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agadjanian, A.K. and Lopatin, A.V., Problems and contradictions of the modern system of mammals, in Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii. Mater. mezhdunar. soveshch. 1–4 fevralya 2011 g. (International Conference on the Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories, February 1–4, 2011), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Evol. Ekol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2011, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrov, E.B., Borodin, P.M., Ginzburg, V.P., et al., New simian process?, Izvestiya, 2006, March, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J., Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism, in Models in Paleobiology, Schopf, T.J.M., Ed., San Francisco: Freeman, 1972, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaneto, D., Herniou, E.A., Boschetti, C., et al., Evidence for independently evolving species in bdelloid rotifers, PLoS Biol., 2007, vol. 5, pp. 914–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Eldredge, N., Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered, Paleobiology, 1977, vol. 3, pp. 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., Plant speciation, 2nd ed., New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodnitskii, D.L., Dve teorii biologicheskoi evolyutsii (Two Theories of Biological Evolution), Krasnoyarsk: Inst. Lesa im. Sukacheva Sib Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodnitskii, D.L., Epigenetic theory of evolution as a possible basis for new evolutionary synthesis, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2001, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., Grundzuge eine Theorie der phylogenetische Systematic, Berlin: Deutsche Zentralverlag, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., Phylogenetic Systematics, Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostina, I.L., Rautian, A.S., and Rautian, G.S., Sravnitel’naya i evolyutsionnaya morfologiya okraski opereniya ptits po materialam aberrativnoi izmenchivosti iz fondov Gosudarstvennogo Darvinovskogo muzeya (Comparative and Evolutionary Morphology of Color of Avian Plumage Based on Materials of Aberrant Variation from the State Darwinian Museum), Moscow: Gos. Darvin. Muz., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyubishchev, A.A., On the form of natural system of organisms, in Lyubishchev A.A. Problemy formy, sistematiki i evolyutsii organizmov (Problems of the Shape, Taxonomy, and Evolution of Organisms), Moscow: Nauka, 1968, pp. 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge: Belknap Press Harvard Univ. Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., Populations, Species, and Evolution: An Abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge: Belknap Press Harvard Univ. Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponomarenko, A.G. and Rasnitsyn, A.P., On phenetic and phylogenetic systems, Zool. Zh., 1971, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A.P., Rates of evolution and evolutionary theory (a hypothesis for adaptive compromise), in Evolyutsiya i biotsenoticheskie krizisy (Evolution and Biocoenotic Crises), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A.P., Phylogenetics, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Moscow: Nedra, 1988, vol. 1, pp. 480–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A.P., Biodiversity contest announce by George Soros (preliminary results), Paleontol. Zh., 1993, no. 1, pp. 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A.P., Evolutionary process and methodology of systematics, Tr. Russk. Entomol. Ob-va, 2002, vol. 73, pp. 1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A. P., Ontology of evolution and methodology of taxonomy, Paleontol. J., 2006, vol. 40, suppl. 6, pp. S679–S737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A.P., Theoretical foundation of evolutionary biology, in Vvedenie v paleoentomologiyu (Introduction in Paleoentomology), Moscow: KMK, 2008, pp. 6–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A.P., Molecular phylogenetics, morphological cladistics, and fossils, Entomol. Rev., 2010, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 263–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn, A.P., When life did not think about death, Priroda (Moscow), 2012, no. 9, pp. 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautian, A.S., Paleontology as a source of information on patterns and factors of an evolution, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Moscow: Nedra, 1988, vol. 2, pp. 76–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautian, A.S., On the nature of genotype and heredity, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1993, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 132–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautian, A.S. and Rautian, G.S., Mosphological foundation of homological series in hereditary variation, using chromatic aberrations of Tetraonidae as an example, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1985, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabanov, D.A., What will be the third synthesis in the evolutionary theory? http://batrachos.com/Tretii_sintez. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and natural selection, Ontogenez, 1984, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and evolutionary theory, in Evolyutsiya i biotsenoticheckie kpizisy (Evolution and Biocoenotic Crises), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 76–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Evolution as epigenetic process, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Moscow: Hedpa, 1988a, vol. 1, pp. 142–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Patterns of evolution of ontogeny, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Moscow: Nedra, 1988b, vol. 1, pp. 169–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and lessons of evolutionism, Ontogenez, 2006, vol. 37, pp. 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary theory and scientific thinking, Paleontol. J., 2010, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 601–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin, M.A., Systemic Foundations of Morphogenesis and Their Manifestation in the Fossil Record, Paleontol. J., 2012, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvarts, I.I., Pokrovskii, A.V., and Ovchinnikova, N.A., Experimental study of the principle of founder, in Eksperimental’noe issledovanie vnutrividovoi izmenchivosti pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh (Experimental Study of Intraspecific Variation of Vertebrates), Sverdlovsk: Ural. Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1966, pp. 1–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • “United Russia” proposed an alternative of the Darwin’s theory for schoolchildren, http://24smi.org/news/7432-quotedinaia-rossiiaquot-predlo.html. 08.10.2012.

  • Vasil’ev, A.G., Epigenetic variability: Nonmetric threshold characters, phenes, and their compositions, in Fenetika prirodnykh populyatsii (Phenetics of Natural Populations), Moscow: Nauka, 1988, pp. 158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil’ev, A.G., Epigeneticheskie osnovy fenetiki: na puti k populyatsionnoi meronomii (Epigenetic Bases of Phenetics: Pathway to Population Meronomy), Yekaterinburg: Akademkniga, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil’ev, A.G., Phenogenetic variability and population meronomy, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2009, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zherikhin, V.V., Cladistics in palaeontology: Problems and constraints, in Amba Projects AM/PFCM98/1.99: Proceedings of the First International Palaeoentomological Conference, Moscow, 1998, Bratislava, 1998, pp. 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Rasnitsyn.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.P. Rasnitsyn, 2014, published in Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 2014, No. 1, pp. 3–8.

Modified report read on December 20, 2012 at the meeting dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the Orlov Paleontological Museum of the Borissiak Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasnitsyn, A.P. Evolutionary theory: The current state. Paleontol. J. 48, 1–6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030114010110

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030114010110

Keywords

Navigation