Skip to main content
Log in

Foliar seed-bearing organs of Paleozoic ginkgophytes and the early evolution of the Ginkgoales

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the Late Paleozoic phase of the evolution of the ginkgophytes (gymnosperms attributed to the order Ginkgoales). New genera and species of Permian gymnosperms are erected that are more or less confidently related to the Ginkgoales or belong to ancestral (for this order) pteridosperms with foliar seed-bearing organs: Cheirocladus longicheirus Naugolnykh, gen. et sp. nov. and Psygmophyllodendron uralensis Naugolnykh, gen. et sp. nov. A new family, Cheirocladaceae Naugolnykh, fam. nov., uniting gymnosperms with weakly modified foliar seed-bearing systems is proposed. The extended diagnosis of the family Psygmophyllaceae Zalessky emend. Naugolnykh, emend. nov. is provided. The extensive study of additional new material allowed the author to describe the morphology of Biarmopteris pulchra Zalessky (Cheirocladaceae), Psygmophyllum expansum (Brongniart) Schimper, and P. cuneifolium (Kutorga) Schimper (Psygmophyllaceae). Racemose aggregations of seeds of Karkenia sp. (Karkeniaceae), the oldest reliable record of Karkenia Archangelsky, are characterized. The typology of foliar seed-bearing organs of early ginkgophytes and morphogenetic transformations of the leaves of ginkgophytes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. M. Anderson and H. M. Anderson, Palaeoflora of Southern Africa. Prodromus of South African Megafloras: Devonian to Lower Cretaceous (A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Anderson and H. Anderson, Paleoflora of Southern Africa, Molteno Formation (Triassic), Vol. 2: Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium) (A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Anderson and H. Anderson, Heyday of the Gymnosperms: Systematics and Biodiversity of the Late Triassic Molteno Fructifications (Natl. Bot. Inst., Pretoria, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. N. Andrews, “Dichophyllum moorei and Certain Associated Seeds,” Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 28(4), 375–385 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O. I. Anisimova, “A New Genus Caucasia from the Middle Carboniferous of Northern Caucasia,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 2, 138–139 (1973).

  6. E. A. N. Arber, “On Psygmophyllum majus sp. nov. from the Lower Carboniferous Rocks of Newfoundland, together with a Revision of the Genus and Remarks on Its Affinities,” Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Ser. 2 7, 391–407 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Archangelsky, “Fossil Ginkgoales from the Tico Flora, Santa-Cruz Province, Argentina,” Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist., Geol. 10(5), 119–137 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Archangelsky and R. Cuneo, “Polyspermophyllum, a New Permian Gymnosperm from Argentina, with Considerations about the Dicranophyllales,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 63, 117–135 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Asama, “Permian Plants from Maiya, Japan: 1. Cathaysiopteris and Psygmophyllum,” Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus. Tokyo 10(2), 153–193 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. V. Babkov, “Contribution to the Geological and Petrographic Characterization of the Lower Kazanian Deposits of the Perm-Kungur Region: Issue on the Occasion of the 17th International Geological Congress,” Uch. Zap. Permsk. Univ., 15–66 (1937).

  11. U. Bajpai, “On Ginkgoites Leaves from the Early Permian of Rajmahal Hills, Bihar, India,” Ameghiniana (Rev. Asoc. Paleontol. Argent.) 28(1–2), 145–148 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Barthel, K. Mutze, and R. Simon, “Neue Funde fossiler Pflanzen aus dem Saale-Trog,” Wiss. Z. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 4, 475–485 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. W. Baxter and E. L. Hartman, “The Coal-Age Flora of Kansas. A Fossil Coniferophyte Wood,” Phytomorphology 4(3–4), 316–325 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. B. Beck, “Ginkgophyton (Psygmophyllum) with a Stem of Gymnospermic Structure,” Science 141, 431–433 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. B. Beck, “Current Status of the Progymnospermopsida,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 21, 5–23 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. A. Bell, “Flora of Pennsylvanian Pictou Group of New Brunswick,” Bull. Geol. Surv. Can. 87, 1–71 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Brongniart, Histoire des végétaux fossiles ou recherches botaniques et géologiques sur les végétaux renfermés dans les diverses couches du globe (G. Dufour et E. d’Ocagne, Paris, 1828).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Brongniart, “Végétaux,” in R. I. Murchison, E. Verneuil, and A. Keyserling, Géologie de la Russie d’Europe et des montagnes de l’Oural. Paléontologie (John Murray, London, Paris, 1845), Vol. 2. Part 3, pp. 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Broutin, “Ginkgophyllum boureaui, nouvelle espèce de ginkgophyta du Permien inférieur du Sud-Ouest de l’Espagne,” Paléobotanique recherches nouvelles sur l’évolution végétale (Bull. de la section des sciences. T. 8) (C.T.H.S., Paris, 1985), pp. 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Broutin, Étude paléobotanique et palynologique du passage Carbonifère-Permien dans le Sud-Ouest de la Péninsule Ibérique (CNRS, Paris, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. I. Burago, “On Floristic Links between the Western and Eastern Parts of Angaraland in the Permian,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 1, 94–103 (1976).

  22. V. I. Burago, “Contribution to the Morphology of the Leaf of the Genus Psygmophyllum,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 2, 128–136 (1982).

  23. T. A. Bykovskaya, “Fructification Ilfeldia with Leaves of the Pursongia Type in the Upper Carboniferous of the Tien Shan,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 3, 122–124 (1985).

  24. S. N. Cesari and M. Hünicken, “Velizia inconstans gen. et sp. nov., a New Gymnosperm from the Late Palaeozoic of Argentina,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 224(4–6), 121–129 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Crookall, “Fossil Plants of Carboniferous Rocks of Great Britain,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Great Br. Palaeontol. 4(Part 2), 1–216 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Cuneo, “Sobre la presencia de probables Ginkgoales en el Pérmico Inferior de Chubut, Argentina,” in Actas VII Simposio Argentino de Paleobotánica y Palinologiá (Buenos-Aires, 1987), pp. 47–50.

  27. R. Daber, “Versuche von Vergleichen des Chacassopteris-Blattes mit Ginkgo, Anisopteris, Diplopteridium und einigen Pteridospermen,” Geologie 21(9), 1108–1117 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Daber, “280 Millionen Jahre Ginkgo—Belegstücke zur Geschichte des Taxons Ginkgo L. aus den Sammlungen und Anlagen der Humboldt-Universität,” in 100 Jahre Arboretum (1879–1979) (Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, 1980), pp. 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. M. Del Fueyo and S. Archangelsky, “New Studies on Karkenia incurva Archang. from the Early Cretaceous of Argentina. Evolution of the Seed Cone in Ginkgoales,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 256, 111–122 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Del Tredici, “Ginkgos and Multituberculates: Evolutionary Interactions in the Tertiary,” Biosystems 22(4), 327–339 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Delevoryas, “Perspectives on the Origin of Cycads and Cycadeoids,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 37, 115–132 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. W. A. DiMichele, D. S. Chaney, W. H. Dixon, et al., “An Early Permian Coastal Flora from the Central Basin Platform of Gaines County, West Texas,” Palaios 15, 524–534 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. E. Dorf, “The Geological Distribution of the Ginkgo Family,” Bull. Wagner Free Inst. Sci. 33(1), 1–10 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Doweld, Prosyllabus tracheophytorum. Tentamen systematis plantarum vascularum (Tracheophyta) (Geos, Moscow, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. I. Eichwald, Lethaia Rossica (Paleontology of Russia). Flora of Grauwakka, Mountain-Mudstone, and Copper-Sandstone Formations (St.-Petersbourg, 1854).

  36. L. Emberger, “Sur les Ginkgoales et quelques rapprochements avec d’autres groupes systématiques,” Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 48(2), 361–367 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. Escapa and R. Cuneo, “Una nueva especie de Ginkgophyllum Saporta ex Neuburg en el Pérmico Temprano de Chubut, Argentina,” Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat., N. S. 5(2), 181–184 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. Florin, “Die fossilen Ginkgophyten von Franz-Josephland nebst Erörterungen über vermeintliche Cordaitales mesozoischen Alters. I. Spezieller Teil,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 81, 73–173 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Florin, “The Morphology of Trichopitys heteromorpha Saporta, a Seed-Plant of Paleozoic Age, and the Evolution of the Female Flowers in the Ginkgoinae,” Acta Horti Bergiani 15, 80–109 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  40. W. M. Fontaine and I. C. White, “The Permian or Upper Carboniferous Flora of West Virginia,” Philadelphia Geol. Surv. Rep., 1–142 (1880).

  41. D. Franceschi and C. Vozenin-Serra, “Origine du Ginkgo biloba L. Approche phylogénétique,” C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sciences de la vie 323, 583–592 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Frenguelli, “Las especies del género Zuberia en la Argentina,” An. Mus. La Plata, Sec. B, Paleobot. 2(1), 1–30 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fundamentals of Paleontology: Gymnosperms and Angiosperms (Gos. Nauchno-Tekh. Izd. Lit-ry Geol. Okhrane Nedr, Moscow, 1963) [in Russian].

  44. W. H. Gillespie and H. W. Pfefferkorn, “Taeniopterid Lamina on Phasmatocycas Megasporophylls (Cycadales) from the Lower Permian of Kansas, USA,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 49, 99–116 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ginkgo biloba—A Global Treasure from Biology to Medicine, Ed. by T. Hori et al. (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  46. S. G. Gorelova, “A New Representative of the Late Permian Ginkgoales,” in New Specie of Ancient Plants and Invertebrates of the USSR. Part 1 (Gos. Nauchno-Tekh. Izd. Lit-ry Geol. Okhrane Nedr, Moscow, 1960), pp. 103–104 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  47. W. Gothan and P. Kukuk, “Über das sogenannte “Psygmophyllum” delvali Cambier und Renier,” Sitzungber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 66–77 (1933).

  48. T. G. Halle, “Palaeozoic Plants from Central Shansi,” Palaeontol. Sin., Ser. A 2(1), 1–316 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  49. T. M. Harris and W. Millington, The Yorkshire Jurassic Flora. IV. 1. Ginkgoales (British Mus. [Nat. Hist.], London, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  50. O. A. Hoeg, “The Downtonian and Devonian Flora of Spitsbergen,” Norges Svalb. Ishavs Unders. Skrifter 83, 1–228 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  51. O. A. Hoeg, “Ordre incertae sedis des Palaeophyllales,” in Traité de Paléobotanique. Tome 2. Bryophyta, Lycophyta, Ed. by E. Boureau (Masson et Cie, Paris, 1967), pp. 362–399.

    Google Scholar 

  52. N. M. Kadlets and L. V. Romanovskaya, Catalogue of the Holotypes of the Species of Fauna and Flora Housed in the TsNIGR Museum. Issue 2. Part I. Paleozoic (Vses. Geol. Inst., Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  53. S. Kawasaki and E. Kon’no, “Flora of the Heian System in Korea, Pt 3,” Bull. Geol. Surv. Korea 6(3), 32–44 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  54. M. Kirchner and J. H. A. Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert, “Schmeissneria microstachys (Presl, 1833) Kirchner et Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert comb. nov. and Karkenia hauptmannii Kirchner et Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert, sp. nov., Plants with Ginkgoalean Affinities from the Liassic of Germany,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 83, 199–215 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. E. Kon’no, “The Upper Permian Flora from the Eastern Border of Northeast China,” Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ., Ser. 2 (Geol.) 39(3), 159–211 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  56. V. A. Krassilov, Mesozoic Flora of the Bureya River (Ginkgoales and Czekanowskiales) (Nauka, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  57. V. A. Krassilov, “Early Cretaceous Flora of Mongolia,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 181, 1–43 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  58. V. A. Krassilov, Origin and Early Evolution of the Flowering Plants (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  59. R. Krausel, “Die Ginkgophyten der Trias von Lunz in Nieder-Österreich und von Neuewelt bei Basel,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 87, 59–93 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  60. R. Krausel and F. Schaarschmidt, “Die Keuperflora von Neuewelt bei Basel. 4. Pterophyllum und Taeniopteriden,” Schweitzer. Palaeontol. Abh., No. 84, 5–64 (1966).

  61. S. S. Kutorga, “Beitrag zur Kenntniss der organischen Überreste des Kupfersandsteins am westlichen Abhange des Urals,” Verhandl. D.-K. Miner. Gesellsch. SPb., 24–34 (1838).

  62. Y. Lemoigne, “La flore fossile aux cours des temps géologiques. Introduction, 1-ère et 2-ème parties,” Geobios 1 (Spec. 10), 11–384 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  63. H. K. Maheshwari and U. Bajpai, “Ginkgophyte Leaves from the Permian Gondwana of the Rajmahal Basin, India,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 224(4–6), 131–149 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  64. P. K. Maithy, “Studies in the Glossopteris Flora of India-41. Gondwanophyton gen. nov. with a Revision of Allied Plant Fossils from the Lower Gondwana of India,” Palaeobotanist 21(3), 298–304 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  65. S. McLoughlin, “Permian Sphenophytes from the Collie and Perth Basins, Western Australia,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 75, 153–182 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. S. V. Meyen, “The Carboniferous and Permian Floras of Angaraland: A Synthesis,” Biol. Mem. 7, 1–109 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  67. S. V. Meyen, “Systematics of the Peltaspermaceous Pteridosperms and Their Position in the Phylogeny of Gymnosperms,” Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol. 88(1), 3–14 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  68. S. V. Meyen, “Basic Features of Gymnosperm Systematics and Phytogeny As Shown by the Fossil Record,” Bot. Rev. 50(1), 1–111 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. S. V. Meyen, Fundamentals of Palaeobotany (Chapman and Hall, London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  70. S. V. Meyen, Fundamentals of Paleobotany (Nedra, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  71. S. V. Meyen, “Gymnosperms of the Angara Flora,” in Origin and Evolution of Gymnosperms, Ed. by C. B. Beck (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1988), pp. 338–381.

    Google Scholar 

  72. S. V. Meyen, “Gymnosperms of the Angara Flora,” in Evolution and Systematics of Higher Plants according to the Data of Paleobotany (Nauka, Moscow, 1992), pp. 120–147 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  73. J. M. Millan, “Novas fructificaões na flora Glossopteris do Gondwana inferior do Brazil. Dolianitia gen. nov.,” Div. Geol. Min. Nat. Prest. Est. 140, 1–19 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  74. R. C. Moore, M. K. Elias, and N. D. Newell, “A “Permian” Flora from the Pennsylvanian Rocks of Kansas,” J. Geol. 44, 1–31 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. S. V. Naugolnykh, “Peltaspermaceous Pteridosperms from the Lower Permian of the Fore-Urals,” Occas. Publ. Earth Sci. Res. Inst. Univ. South Caroline 8B, 69–73 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  76. S. V. Naugolnykh, “A New Genus of Ginkgo-like Leaves from the Kungurian of the Urals Region,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 3, 106–116 (1995).

  77. S. V. Naugolnykh, Kungurian Flora of the Middle Cis-Urals: Proceedings of the Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Issue 509 (Geos, Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  78. S. V. Naugolnykh, “Paleobotany of the Upper Carboniferous/Lower Permian of the Southern Urals. Part 3. Generative Organs of Gymnosperms,” Permophiles 39, 19–23 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  79. S. V. Naugolnykh, “Fossil Flora of the Copper Sandstones (Upper Permian of the Urals Region),” VM-Novitates, News from V.I. Vernadsky Geol. Museum, No. 8, 1–48 (2002).

  80. S. V. Naugolnykh, “The Main Archetypes and Morphological Diversity of Paleozoic Ginkgophytes,” in Modern Problems of Paleofloristics, Paleophytogeography, and Phytostratigraphy. Proceedings of Int. Paleobot. Conf., Issue 1 (Geos, Moscow, 2005), pp. 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  81. V. G. Novokshonov, “Fossils Insects of Chekarda,” in Chekarda—A Locality of Permian Fossil Plants and Insects, Ed. by V. P. Ozhgibesov (Permsk. Gos. Univ., Perm’, 1998), pp. 25–54 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  82. J. Obrhel, “Vznik a vyvoj kapradorostu,” Zpr. Cs. Bot. Spol. 25(8), 3–30 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  83. P. K. Pal and A. Ghosh, “Platyphyllum bokaroensis sp. nov. from East Bokaro Coal-Field, India,” Geophytology 18(2), 219–220 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  84. D. D. Pant, “Reproductive Biology of the Glossopterids and Their Affinities,” Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr., Actuelle Bot. 134(2), 77–93 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  85. V. D. Prynada, Materials to the Knowledge of Mesozoic Flora of the Kolyma River Basin (Dal’stroi, Leningrad, 1938) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  86. W. Remy and R. Remy, “Die Flora des Perms im Trompia-Tal und die Grenze Saxon/Thuring in den Alpen,” Argumenta Palaeobot. 5, 57–90 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  87. W. Remy, R. Remy, G. A. Leisman, and H. Hass, “Der Nachweis von Callipteris flabellifera (Weiss, 1879) Zeiller 1898 in Kansas, U.S.A.,” Argumenta Palaeobot. 6, 1–36 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  88. G. Retallack, “Middle Triassic Megafossil Plants from Long Gully, near Otematata, North Otago, New Zealand,” J. R. Soc. New Zealand 11(3), 167–200 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  89. G. Retallack, “Triassic Fossil Plant Fragments from Shallow Marine Rocks of the Murihiku Supergroup, New Zealand,” J. R. Soc. New Zealand 15(1), 1–26 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  90. J. Rigby, “On Arberia White, and Some Related Lower Gondwana Female Fructifications,” Palaeontology 15, 108–120 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  91. D. L. Royer, L. J. Hickey, and S. L. Wing, “Ecological Conservatism in the “Living Fossil” Ginkgo,” Paleobiology 29(1), 84–104 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. V. A. Samylina, “Grenana—A New Genus of Pteridosperms from the Jurassic Deposits of Central Asia,” Bot. Zh. 75(6), 846–850 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  93. G. Saporta, “Sur la découverte de deux types nouveaux de conifères dans les schistes permiens de Lodève (Herault),” CR. Acad. Sci. Paris 80, 1017–1020 (1875).

    Google Scholar 

  94. G. Saporta, “Observations sur la nature des végétaux réunis dans le groupe des Noeggerathia,” CR. Acad. Sci. Paris 86, 746–749, 801–804, 869–873 (1878).

    Google Scholar 

  95. G. Saporta and A. F. Marion, L’évolution de règne végétal. Les Phanerogammes. T. 1 (Masson et Cie, Paris, 1885).

    Google Scholar 

  96. W. P. Schimper, Traité de paléontologie végétale ou la flore du monde primitif. T. 2 (Baillere et fils, Paris, 1870–1872).

    Google Scholar 

  97. J. Schmalhausen, “Beiträge zur Jura-Flora Russlands,” Mem. Acad. Imper. Sci. St-Peterbourg, Ser. 7 27(4), 1–96 (1879).

    Google Scholar 

  98. J. Schmalhausen, “Die Planzenreste der artinskien und permischen Ablagerungen im Osten des Europäischen Russlands,” Mém. Com. Géol. 2(4), 1–42 (1887).

    Google Scholar 

  99. H.-J. Schweitzer and M. Kirchner, “Die Rhaeto-Jurassischen Floren des Iran und Afghanistan: 8. Ginkgophyta,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 237, 11–58 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  100. A. C. Seward, Plants through the Ages: A Geological and Botanical Metrospect (Hafner, Cambridge, 1931; Akad. Nauk SSSR, Leningrad-Moscow, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  101. R. V. Sitholey, “On Psygmophyllum haydeni Seward,” J. Indian Bot. Soc. 22(2–4), 183–190 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  102. T. A. Sixtel, “Jurassic Flora of the Fan-Yagnob Coalfield,” Tr. Inst. Geol. Akad. Nauk Tadzh. SSR 11, 1–68 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  103. T. A. Sixtel, “Materials to the Stratigraphy of the Jurassic Beds of the Kok-Yagnak Coalfield,” Tr. Inst. Geol. Akad. Nauk Uzb. SSR, No. 2, Issue 7, 69–114 (1953).

  104. T. A. Sixtel, “A New Middle Carboniferous Trichopitys of Uzbekistan,” in New Species of Ancient Plants and Invertebrates of the USSR. Part 1 (Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, 1960), pp. 105–106 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  105. T. A. Sixtel, Yu. M. Kuzichkina, L. I. Savitskaya, et al., “Contribution to the History of the Development of Ginkgoales in Central Asia,” in Paleobotany of Uzbekistan (Fan, Tashkent, 1971), Vol. 2, pp. 62–116 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  106. T. A. Sixtel, L. I. Savitskaya, and T. A. Iskandarkhodzhaev, “Plants of the Middle Carboniferous, Upper Carboniferous, and Lower Permian of Fergana,” in Biostratigraphy of the Upper Paleozoic of the Mountain Margin of Southern Fergana (Fan, Tashkent, 1975), pp. 77–143 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  107. N. S. Snigirevskaya, “A Unique Mode of the Natural Propagation of Ginkgo biloba L.—The Key to the Problem of Its Survival,” Acta Paleobot. 34(2), 215–223 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  108. F. A. Stanislawski, “A New Genus Toretzia from the Upper Triassic of the Donets Basin and Its Relationship to the Genera of the Order Ginkgoales,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 1, 88–96 (1973).

  109. Sze Sin-jiang, Fossils Plants of China (Chinese Acad. Sci., Pekin, 1953) [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  110. A. L. Takhtajan, Higher Plants: I. From Psilophytes to Coniferophytes (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 1956) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  111. T. N. Taylor and E. L. Taylor, The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  112. W. A. Taylor, T. N. Taylor, and S. Archangelsky, “Comparative Ultrastructure of Fossil and Living Gymnosperm Cuticles,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 59(1–4), 145–151 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. H. Tralau, “The Phytogeographic Evolution of the Genus Ginkgo L.,” Botaniska Notiser 120, 409–422 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  114. L. Villar De Seoane, “Comparative Study between Ginkgoites tigrensis Archangelsky and Ginkgo biloba Linn. Leaves,” Palaeobotanist 46(3), 1–12 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  115. R. H. Wagner, N. J. Soper, and A. K. Higgins, “A Late Permian Flora of Pechora Affinity in North Greenland,” Grønland Geol. Unders. 198, 5–13 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  116. R. H. Wagner, S. Lausberg, and S. V. Naugolnykh, “The Permian Angara Flora from North Greenland: A Progress Report,” Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol. Mem., No. 19, 382–392 (2002).

  117. J. Wang and H. W. Pfefferkorn, “Nystroemia reniformis (Kawasaki) from the Early Permian of Dengfeng Coalfield, Henan, China,” in 7th Int. Organ. Paleobot. Conf., Bariloche, Argentina. Abst. (Arsa Gráfica, Bahía Blanca, 2004), pp. 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  118. J. Wang, H. W. Pfefferkorn, and L. Lujun, “Discovery of Organic Connection of Chiropteris Kurr and Nystroemia Halle from Early Permian of Western Henan, China,” Chinese Sci. Bull. 48(20), 2248–2252 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Wang Zi-Qiang, “Past Global Floristic Changes: The Permian Great Eurasian Floral Interchange,” Palaeontology 39(Part 1), 189–217 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Yao Zhao-qi, “Psygmophylloids of the Cathasia Flora,” Acta Palaeontol. Sin. 28(2), 171–191 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  121. M. D. Zalessky, “Observations sur les nouveaux specimens du Psygmophyllum expansum Brongniart et sur une nouvelle plante fossile Idelopteris elegans n. g. et sp.,” Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS, Cl. Sci. Phys.-Math., Ser. 7, No. 8, 717–727 (1929a).

  122. M. D. Zalessky, “Sur le Syniopteris nesterenkoi n. g. et sp. et la Syniopteris demetriana n. g. et sp. nouveaux végétaux permiens,” Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS, Cl. Sci. Phys.-Math., Ser. 7, No. 8, 729–736 (1929b).

  123. M. D. Zalessky, “Observations sur les végétaux nouveaux du terrain permien inférieur de l’Oural. I,” Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS, Cl. Sci. Phys.-Math., No. 2, 283–298 (1933).

  124. M. D. Zalessky, “Observations sur les végétaux nouveaux du terrain permien inférieur de l’Oural. II,” Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS, Cl. Sci. Math.-Nat., No. 7, 1093–1102 (1934a).

  125. M. D. Zalessky, “Observations sur les végétaux permiens du bassin de la Petchora. I,” Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS, Cl. Sci. Math.-Nat., Nos. 2–3, 241–290 (1934b).

  126. M. D. Zalessky, “Sur la distinction de l’étage Bardien dans le Permien de l’Oural et sur sa flore fossile,” Probl. Paleontol. 2–3, 37–101 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  127. M. D. Zalessky, “Végétaux Permiens du Bardien de l’Oural,” Probl. Paleontol. 5, 329–374 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Yu. M. Zalessky, “Permian Insects of the Sylva River Basin and Problems in the Evolution of the Class Insecta,” Probl. Paleontol. 5, 33–91 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Z. Zhou, “Phylogeny and Evolutionary Trends of Mesozoic Ginkgoaleans—A Preliminary Assessment,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 68, 203–216 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Z. Zhou, “Mesozoic Ginkgoacean Megafossils: A Systematic Review,” in Ginkgo biloba—A Global Treasure from Biology to Medicine, Ed. by T. Hori et al. (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1997), pp. 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Z. Zhou and B. Zhang, “Two New Ginkgoalean Female Reproductive Organs from the Middle Jurassic of Henan Province,” Kekue Tongbao Sci. Bull. 33(14), 1201–1203 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Z. Zhou and B. Zhang, “Middle Jurassic Ginkgo with Ovule-Bearing Organs from Henan, China,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 211(4–6), 113–133 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Z. Zhou and B. Zhang, “Baiera hallei Sze and Associated Ovule-Bearing Organs from the Middle Jurassic of Henan, China,” Palaeontogr. Abt. B 224(4–6), 151–169 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Z. Zhou, B. Zhang, Y. Wang, and G. Guignard, “A New Karkenia (Ginkgoales) from the Jurassic Yima Formation, Henan, China and Its Megaspore Membrane Ultrastructure,” Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 120, 91–105 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Naugolnykh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naugolnykh, S.V. Foliar seed-bearing organs of Paleozoic ginkgophytes and the early evolution of the Ginkgoales. Paleontol. J. 41, 815–859 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030107080011

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030107080011

Key words

Navigation