Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlocality, Bell’s Ansatz, and probability

  • Quantum Optics and Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics
  • Published:
Optics and Spectroscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantum mechanics lacks an intuitive interpretation, which is the cause of a generally formalistic approach to its use. This in turn has led to a certain insensitivity to the actual meaning of many words used in its description and interpretation. Herein, we analyze carefully the possible mathematical meanings of those terms used in analysis of EPR’s contention, that Quantum Mechanics is incomplete, as well as Bell’s work descendant therefrom. As a result, many inconsistencies and errors in contemporary discussions of nonlocality, as well as in Bell’s Ansatz with respect to the laws of probability, are identified. Evading these errors precludes serious conflicts between Quantum Mechanics and both Special Relativity and Philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Beller, Quantum Dialog (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Bell, The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Ed. by M. Bell, K. Gottfried, and M. Veltman (World Sci., Singapore, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. F. Kracklauer, in Foundations of Probability and Physics—3, Ed. by A. Khrennikov, AIP Conf. Proc. 750, 219 (2005).

  5. A. Afriat and F. Selleri, The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox (Plenum Press, New York, 1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (John Wiley & Sons., New York, 1950).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Jaynes, in Maximum Entropy and Baysian Methods, Ed. by J. Skilling (Kluwer Acad. Press, Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Perdijon, Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 16, 281–286 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. F. Kracklauer, Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 25(2), 193–208 (2000).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. N. F. Mott, Elements of Wave Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1960), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. F. Kracklauer, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opts. 6, S544 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. J. E. Moyal, Proc. Cambridge. Phil. Soc. 45, 99 (1947).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics (World Sci., Singapore, 1998).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. F. Kracklauer, Found. Phys. Lett. 12(2), 441 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Heisenberg, Z. Physik 38, 411 (1926).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. D. Mermin, J. Philosophy 78, 397 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Hasselbach, in Waves and Particles in Light and Matter, Ed. by A. van der Merwe and A. Garuccio (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), pp. 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. R. Popper, Die Naturwissenschaften 22, 804 (1934).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. H. Kim and Y. H. Shih, Found. Phys. 29, 1849 (1999); T. D. Angelidis, in Gravitation and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale, Ed. by R. L. Amoroso, et al. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002), pp. 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N. V. Evdokimov, D. N. Klyshko, V. P. Komolov, and V. A. Yarochkin, Physics-Uspekhi 39, 83 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. F. Kracklauer, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opts. 4, S121 (2002).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. S. L. Braunstein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Banaszek and K. Wódkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A 58(6), 4345 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. K. K. Wan, in Fundamental Aspects of Quantum Theory, NATO ASI Ser. B 144, Ed. by V. Gorini and A. Frigerio (Plenum, New York, 1998), pp. 451–452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. F. Kracklauer.

Additional information

The text was submitted by the author in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kracklauer, A.F. Nonlocality, Bell’s Ansatz, and probability. Opt. Spectrosc. 103, 451–460 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X07090147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X07090147

PACS numbers

Navigation