Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Method for the molecular cytogenetic visualization of fragile site FRAXA

  • Molecular Cell Biology
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome is one of the most common reasons for human hereditary mental retardation. It is associated with the expansion of CGG repeats in the 5'-untranslated region of the FMR1 gene, which results in the suppression of its expression and the development of the disease. At present, methods based on PCR and Southern blot analysis are used for diagnostics of the fragile X syndrome. The presence of a fragile site FRAXA on the X chromosome is typical for patients with this pathology. We developed a method of visualizing this site in cell cultures obtained from patients using the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and the combination of two probes. The method allows one to detect five types of signals on the X chromosome, three of which are normal, while two are associated with the emergence of fragile site FRAXA. An analysis of the distribution of all signal types in cell lines from healthy individuals and patients with fragile X syndrome demonstrated that the method allows one to determine differences between lines with a high statistical significance and that it is applicable to detecting cells that are carriers of the syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FXS:

fragile X syndrome

FdU:

fluorodeoxyuridine

FISH:

fluorescent in situ hybridization

References

  1. Martin J.P., Bell J. 1943. A pedigree of mental defect showing sex-linkage. J. Neurol. Psychiatry. 6, 154–157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Saldarriaga W., Tassone F., González-Teshima L.Y., Forero-Forero J.V., Ayala-Zapata S., Hagerman R. 2014. fragile X syndrome. Colombia Médica. 45, 190–198.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter J., Rivero-Arias O., Angelov A., Kim E., Fotheringham I., Leal J. 2014. Epidemiology of fragile X syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A. 164, 1648–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Hulst C., Kooy R.F. 2009. Fragile X syndrome: From molecular genetics to therapy. J. Med. Genet. 46, 577–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Monaghan K.G., Lyon E., Spector E. 2013. ACMG standards and guidelines for fragile X testing: A revision to the disease-specific supplements to the standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories of the American college of medical genetics and genomics. Genet. Med. 15, 575–586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallagher A., Hallahan D. 2012. Fragile X-associated disorders: A clinical overview. J. Neurol. 259, 401–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lokanga R.A., Entezam A., Kumari D., Yudkin D., Qin M., Smith C.B., Usdin K. 2013. Somatic expansion in mouse and human carriers of fragile X premutation alleles. Hum. Mutat. 34, 157–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biancalana V., Steinbach P., Stenhouse S. 2006. Draft best practice guidelines for molecular analysis in fragile X syndrome. Eur. Mol. Genet. Quality Network. http://www.emqn.org/emqn/digitalAssets/0/233_EMQN_guidelines_FRAX_2006.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Houdayer C., Lemonnier A., Gerard M., Chauve C., Tredano M., Billette de Villemeur T., Aymard P., Bonnefont J.P., Feldmann D. 1999. Improved fluorescent PCR-based assay for sizing CGG repeats at the FRAXA locus. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 37, 397–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saluto A., Brussino A., Tassone F., Arduino C., Cagnoli C., Pappi P., Hagerman P., Migone N., Brusco A. 2005. An enhanced polymerase chain reaction assay to detect pre- and full mutation alleles of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene. J. Mol. Diagn. 7, 605–612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Khaniani M.S., Kalitsis P., Burgess T., Slater H.R. 2008. An improved diagnostic PCR assay for identification of cryptic heterozygosity for CGG triplet repeat alleles in the fragile X gene (FMR1). Mol. Cytogenet. 1, 5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Filipovic-Sadic S., Sah S., Chen L., Krosting J., Sekinger E., Zhang W., Hagerman P.J., Stenzel T.T., Hadd A., Latham G.J., Tassone F. 2010. A novel FMR1 PCR method for the routine detection of low-abundance expanded alleles and full mutations in fragile X syndrome. Clin. Chem. 56, 399–408.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Seneca S., Lissens W., Endels K., Caljon B., Bonduelle M., Keymolen K., de Rademaeker M., Ullmann U., Haentjens P., Van Berkel K., Van Dooren S. 2012. Reliable and sensitive detection of fragile X (expanded) alleles in clinical prenatal DNA samples with a fast turnaround time. J. Mol. Diagn. 14, 560–568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tassone F., Pan R., Amiri K., Taylor A.K., Hagerman P.J. 2008. A rapid polymerase chain reaction-based screening method for identification of all expanded alleles of the fragile X (FMR1) gene in newborn and high-risk populations. J. Mol. Diagn. 10, 43–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tassone F. 2015. Advanced technologies for the molecular diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. Exp. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 15, 1465–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naumann A., Hochstein N., Weber S., Fanning E., Doerfler W. 2009. A distinct DNA methylation boundary in the 5' upstream sequence of the Fmr1 promoter binds nuclear proteins and is lost in fragile X syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 606–616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou Y., Law H.Y., Boehm C.D., Yoon C.S., Cutting G.R., Ng I.S.L., Chong S.S. 2004. Robust fragile X (CGG)n genotype classification using a methylation specific triple PCR assay. J. Med. Genet. 41, e45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coffee B., Keith K., Albizua I., Malone T., Mowrey J., Sherman S.L., Warren S.T. 2009. Incidence of fragile X syndrome by newborn screening for methylated FMR1 DNA. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 503–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Strelnikov V.V., Nemtsova M.V., Chesnokova G.G., Kuleshov N.P., Zaletaev D.V. 1999. Diagnosis of the Martin–Bell syndrome based on structural and functional alterations in the 5'-untranslated region of the FMR1 gene. Mol. Biol. (Moscow). 33 (2) 288–294.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lukusa T., Fryns J.P. 2008. Human chromosome fragility. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1779, 3–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yudkin D., Hayward B.E., Aladjem M.I., Kumari D., Usdin K. 2014. Chromosome fragility and the abnormal replication of the FMR1 locus in fragile X syndrome. Human Mol. Genetics. 23, 2940–2952.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutherland G.R., Baker E., Fratini A. 1985. Excess thymidine induced folate sensitive fragile sites. Am. J. Med. Genet. 22, 433–443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grasso M., Boon E.M.J., Filipovic-Sadic S., Van Bunderen P.A., Gennaro E., Cao R., Latham G.J., Hadd A.G., Coviello D.A. 2014. A novel methylation PCR that offers standardized determination of FMR1 methylation and CGG repeat length without southern blot analysis. J. Mol. Diagn. 16, 23–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith K.T., Nicholls R.D., Reines D. 2006. The gene encoding the fragile X RNA-binding protein is controlled by nuclear respiratory factor 2 and the CREB family of transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 1205–1215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sutherland G.R. 2003. Rare fragile sites. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 100, 77–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumari D., Somma V., Nakamura A.J., Bonner W.M., D’Ambrosio E., Usdin K. 2009. The role of DNA damage response pathways in chromosome fragility in fragile X syndrome. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 4385–4392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. V. Yudkin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © T.S. Bobokova, N.A. Lemskaya, I.S. Kolesnikova, D.V. Yudkin, 2017, published in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2017, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 704–709.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bobokova, T.S., Lemskaya, N.A., Kolesnikova, I.S. et al. Method for the molecular cytogenetic visualization of fragile site FRAXA. Mol Biol 51, 621–626 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893317040069

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893317040069

Keywords

Navigation