Skip to main content
Log in

Native NC2 selectively represses incorrect transcription initiation

  • Molecular Mechanisms of Biological Processes
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation depends on the appropriate set of positive and negative signals that provide correct gene expression. Studies in eukaryotic gene expression have shown NC2 to be a general repressor of transcription which blocks the interaction between TFIIB and TBP. However, during the last few years, NC2 has been found to bind the transcriptionally active promoters and interact with several positive transcription factors. These data suggested a controversial role of NC2 in transcription. Using in vitro transcription on a minimal LTR promoter of HIV-1, we show that removal of NC2 from HeLa nuclear extract increases the yield of transcripts, as well as unspecific transcription initiation in a template-amount-dependent manner. Fractions of HeLa nuclear extract containing NC2 can restore basal transcription repression and precise selection of the transcription initiation point. This points to a new role for NC2 as a repressor of inaccurate transcription initiation which allows specific transcription to take place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirn T.K., Zhao Y., Ge H., Bernstein R., Roeder R.G. 1995. TATA-binding protein residues implicated in a functional interplay between negative cofactor NC2 (Drl) and general factors TFIIA and TFIIB. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10976–10981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mermelstein F., Yeung K., Cao J., Inostroza J.A., Erdjument-Bromage H., Eagelson K., Landsman D., Levitt P., Tempst P., Reinberg D. 1996. Requirement of a corepressor for Dr 1-mediated repression of transcription. Genes Dev. 15, 1033–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goppelt A., Stelzer G., Lottspeich F., Meisterernst M. 1996. A mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription through specific binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes via heterodimeric histone fold domains. EMBO J. 15, 3105–3116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamada K., Shu F., Chen H., Malik S., Stelzer G., Roeder R.G., Meisterernst M., Burley S.K. 2001. Crystal structure of negative cofactor 2 recognizing the TBP-DNA transcription complex. Cell. 106, 71–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prelich G. 1997. Saccharomyces cerevisiae BUR6 encodes a DRAP1/NC2alpha homolog that has both positive and negative roles in transcription in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2057–2065.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gang Y., Prelich G. 2002. Direct stimulation of transcription by negative cofactor 2 (NC2) through TATA-binding protein (TBP). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99, 12727–12732.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Willy P.J., Kobayashi R., Kadonaga J.T. 2000. A basal transcription factor that activates or represses transcription. Science. 290, 982–985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Klejman M.P., Pereira L.A., van Zeeburg H.J., Gilfillan S., Meisterernst M., Tirnmers H.T. 2004. NC2alpha interacts with BTAF1 and stimulates its ATP-dependent association with TATA-binding protein. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 10072–10082.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Castaño E., Gross P., Wang Z., Roeder R.G., Oelgeschlager T. 2000. The C-terminal domain-phosphorylated IIO form of RNA polymerase II is associated with the transcription repressor NC2 (Drl/DRAP1) and is required for transcription activation in human nuclear extracts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97, 7184–7189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Denko N., Wernke-Dollries K., Johnson A.B., Hammond E., Chiang C.M., Barton M.C. 2003. Hypoxia actively represses transcription by inducing negative cofactor 2 (Drl/DrAPl) and blocking preinitiation complex assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 5744–5749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Iratni R., Yan Y.T., Chen C., Ding J., Zhang Y., Price S.M., Reinberg D., Shen M.M. 2002. Inhibition of excess nodal signaling during mouse gastrulation by the transcriptional corepressor DRAP1. Science. 298, 1996–1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Creton S., Svejstrup J.Q., Collart M.A. 2002. The NC2 alpha and beta subunits play different roles in vivo. Genes Dev. 16, 3265–3276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikeda K., Halle J.P., Stelzer G., Meisterernst M., Kawakami K. 1998. Involvement of negative cofactor NC2 in active repression by zinc finger-homeodomain transcription factor AREB6. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 10–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dignam J.D., Martin P.L., Shaslry B.S., Roeder R.G. 1983. Eukaryotic gene transcription with purified components. Meth. Enzymol. 101, 582–598.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Castano E., Flores R.D., Zapata L.C. 2005. An easy approach for the purification of native TFIIH. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 31, 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Inostroza J.A., Mermelstein F.H., Ha I., Lane W.S., Reinberg D. 1992. Drl, a TATA binding protein-associated phosphoprotein and inhibitor of class II gene transcription. Cell. 70, 477–489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published in Russian in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2006, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 284–288.

This article was translated by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castaño, E., Rodríguez-Zapata, L., Rodriguez, H.P. et al. Native NC2 selectively represses incorrect transcription initiation. Mol Biol 40, 246–250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893306020105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893306020105

Key words

Navigation