Abstract
The electronic structure of CfO2 is calculated in the fully relativistic cluster approximation of the discrete variation method (RDV). Theoretical X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum of valence electrons is obtained in the range of electron binding energies 0 -…~40 eV. It is shown that outer valence molecular orbitals (OVMOs) in the energy range 0 -…~15 eV are formed by atomic orbitals Cf 5f and Cf 6p. The inner valence molecular orbitals (IVMOs) in the energy range ~15 -…~40 eV are formed mainly by Cf 6p3/2 and O 2s AOs. Significant covalent effects in CfO2 are due to the strong overlap of AOs with the ligand′s orbitals such as Cf 6d as well as Cf 5f and Cf 6p. The structure of MOs formed by Cf 6d, 7s, and 7p AOs differs only slightly from those of dioxides of lighter actinides. These MOs, together with those containing O 2s and O 2p AOs, form a “rigid framework” where MOs containing An 5f AOs move. We suggest a theoretical scheme of MOs that allows understanding the nature of chemical bonding and the structure of the XPS spectrum of valence electrons in CfO2.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J. J. Katz, G. T. Seaborg, and L. R. Morss. The Chemistry of the Actinide Elements. London-New York: Chapman and Hall, 1986.
M. P. Mefodeva and N. N. Krot. Soedineniya transuranovykh elementov (Compounds of Transuranic Elements). Moscow: Nauka, 1987. [In Russian]
B. W. Veal, H. Diamond, and H. R. Hoekstra. Phys. Rev. B, 1977, 15(6), 2929. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.15.2929
X.-D. Wen, R. L. Martin, T. M. Henderson, and G. E. Scuseria. Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 1063. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300374y
L. Petit, A. Svane, Z. Szotek, W. M. Temmerman, and G. M. Stocks. Phys. Rev. B, 2010, 81, 045108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.045108
I. D. Prodan, G. E. Scuseria, and R. L. Martin. Phys. Rev. B, 2007, 76, 033101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.033101
A. Y. Teterin, M. V. Ryzhkov, Y. A. Teterin, L. Vukcevic, V. A. Terekhov, K. I. Maslakov, and K. E. Ivanov. Radiochemistry, 2009, 51, 560.
Yu. A. Teterin and A. Yu. Teterin. Radiochemistry, 2005, 47, 440.
Yu. A. Teterin, A. Yu. Teterin, K. E. Ivanov, M. V. Ryzhkov, K. I. Maslakov, St. N. Kalmykov, V. G. Petrov, and D. A. Enina. Phys. Rev. B, 2014, 89, 035102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.035102
Yu. A. Teterin, K. I. Maslakov, A. Yu. Teterin, K. E. Ivanov, M. V. Ryzhkov, V. G. Petrov, D. A. Enina, and St. N. Kalmykov. Phys. Rev. B, 2013, 87, 245108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245108
Y. A. Teterin, K. I. Maslakov, M. V. Ryzhkov, A. Y. Teterin, K. E. Ivanov, S. N. Kalmykov, and V. G. Petrov. Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Prot., 2015, 30(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP1502083T
R. D. Baybarz, R. G. Haire, and J. A. Fahey. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1972, 34, 557.
A. Rosen and D. E. Ellis. J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 62, 3039. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.430892
D. E. Ellis and G. L. Goodman. Int. J. Quant. Chem., 1984, 25, 185. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560250115
O. Gunnarsson and B. I. Lundqvist. Phys. Rev. B, 1976, 13, 4274. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.4274
P. Pyykko and H. Toivonen. Acta Acad. Abo., Ser. B, 1983, 43, 1-50.
D. A. Varshalovish, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii. Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum. Singapore: World Scientific, 1988.
Yu. A. Teterin and S. G. Gagarin. Russ. Chem. Rev., 1996, 65, 825.
Yu. A. Teterin and A. Yu. Teterin. Russ. Chem. Rev., 2004, 73, 541.
R. S. Mulliken. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1978, 29, 1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.29.100178.000245
P. J. Kelly, M. S. Brooks, and R. Allen. J. Phys., 1979, 40(C4), 184-186. DOI: 10.1051/jphyscol:1979458
V. A. Gubanov, A. Rosen, and D. E. Ellis. J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1979, 40, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(79)90090-8
A. Zaitsevskii, L. V. Skripnikov, and A. V. Titov. Mendeleev Commun., 2016, 26, 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2016.07.013
K. I. Maslakov, Yu. A. Teterin, A. J. Popel, A. Yu. Teterin, K. E. Ivanov, St. N. Kalmykov, V. G. Petrov, P. K. Petrov, and I. Farnan. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 448, 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.077
K. I. Maslakov, Yu. A. Teterin, M. V. Ryzhkov, A. J. Popel, A. Yu. Teterin, K. E. Ivanov, St. N. Kalmykov, V. G. Petrov, P. K. Petrov, and I. Farnan. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20(23), 16167. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01442f
M. B. Trzhaskovskaya and V. G. Yarzhemsky. Atom. Data Nucl. Data, 2018, 119, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2017.04.003
J. C. Slater and K.H. Johnson. Phys. Rev. B, 1972, 5, 844.
V. G. Yarzhemsky, A. Yu. Teterin, Yu. A. Teterin, and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya. Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Prot., 2012, 27, 103. https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP1202103Y
K. N. Huang, M. Aojogi, M. N. Chen, B. Graseman, and H. Mark. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 1976, 18, 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640X(76)90027-9
Funding
The reported study was funded by RFBR, project No. 20-03-00333.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Russian Text © The Author(s), 2021, published in Zhurnal Strukturnoi Khimii, 2021, Vol. 62, No. 12, pp. 1963-1974.https://doi.org/10.26902/JSC_id83848
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Putkov, A.E., Maslakov, K.I., Teterin, Y.A. et al. ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE OF DIOXIDE CfO2. J Struct Chem 62, 1846–1856 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476621120040
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476621120040