Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perception of approaching and withdrawing sound sources after exposure to broadband noise: The importance of spatial domain

  • Comparative and Ontogenic Physiology
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existence of space-specific differences in auditory aftereffects has been tested under short-term (5 s) exposure to broadband noise (20–20000 Hz). Adapting stimuli were emitted as constant-amplitude noise sequences. Test stimuli could be of constant and changing amplitude: increasing amplitude of noise pulses in a sequence mimicked an approaching sound source, whereas a decrease in amplitude was perceived as withdrawal. The experiments were done in an anechoic chamber. Auditory aftereffects were assessed under the following conditions: (a) adapting and test stimuli were emitted through a loudspeaker mounted at a distance of 1.1 m from the listener (i.e., subjectively near); (b) both stimuli were emitted from a distance of 4.5 m (subjectively far); (c) adapting and test stimuli were emitted from different distances. The results showed that the characteristics of perception of the imitated sound source motion were similar in proximity and remoteness, which was observed both in the control (without adaptation) and after adaptation to noise. In the absence of adaptation, the psychophysical curves were asymmetrical: the listeners reported approaching of test stimuli more often for both spatial domains. However, the overestimation of test stimuli as drawing closer was more pronounced when they were emitted from the distance of 1.1 m, i.e., from near the listener. After the adaptation to noise, the aftereffects showed spatial specificity and were observed only when adapting and test stimuli belonged to the same spatial domain. These aftereffects were similar in their pattern and strength both in proximity and remoteness: the listeners reported withdrawal of test stimuli more frequently as compared with the control. As a result of these aftereffects, the symmetry of psychometric curves was restored, and the estimation of the direction of sound source motion in the experiment became equiprobable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman, P.D., An Analysis of Cues to Auditory Depth Perception in Free Space, Psychol. Bull., 1963, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 302–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blauert, J., Spatial Hearing. The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization, Cambridge (USA): The MIT, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kozhevnikova, E.V., Auditory Estimation of Sound Remoteness, Sensorn. Sistemy, 1990, vol. 4, no. 2. pp. 198–208.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zahorik, P., Brungart, D.S., and Bronkhorst, A.W., Auditory Distance Perception in Humans: A Summary of Past and Present Research, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 2005, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 409–420.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zahorik, P. and Wightman, F.L., Loudness Constancy with Varying Sound Source Distance, Nat. Neurosci., 2001, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 78–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenblum, L.D., Carello, C., and Pastore, R.E., Relative Effectiveness of Three Stimulus Variables for Locating a Moving Sound Source, Perception, 1987, vol. 16, pp. 175–186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashmead, D.H., Davis, D., and Northington, A., The contribution of Listeners’ Approaching Motion to Auditory Distance Perception, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform., 1995, vol. 21, pp. 239–256.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graziano, M.S.A., Reiss, L.A.J., and Gross, C.G.A., Neuronal Representation of the Location of Nearby Sound, Nature, 1999, vol. 397, pp. 428–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kopčo, N., Huang, S., Belliveau, J.W., Raij, T., Tengshe, C., and Ahveninen, J., Neuronal Representations of Distance in Human Auditory Cortex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 2012, vol. 109, no. 27, pp. 11 019–11 024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brungart, D.S., Auditory Localization of Nearby Sources. III. Stimulus Effects, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1999, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 3589–3602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brungart, D.S. and Rabinowitz, W.M., Auditory Localization of Nearby Sources. Head-Related Transfer Functions, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1999, vol. 106, no. 3, Pt. 1, pp. 1465–1479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mathiak, K., Hertrich, I., Kincses, W.E., Riekker, A., Lutzenberger, W., and Ackermann, H., The Right Supratemporal Plane Hears the Distance of Objects: Neuromagnetic Correlates of Virtual Reality, Neuroreport, 2003, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 307–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seifritz, E., Neuhoff, J.G., Bilecen, D., Scheffler, K., Mustovic, H., Schächinger, H., Elefante, R., and Di Salle, F., Neural Processing of Auditory Looming in the Human Brain, Curr. Biol., 2002, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 2147–2151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Turlow, W.R. and Jack, C.E., Some Determinants of Localization-Adaptation Effects for Successive Auditory Stimuli, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1973, vol. 53, pp. 1573–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlile, W.D., Hyams, S., and Delaney, S., Systematic Distortions of Auditory Space Perception Following Prolonged Exposure to Broadband Noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 2001, vol. 110, pp. 416–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrenstein, W.H., Direction-Specific Acoustical Aftereffects, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1978, vol. 64,Suppl. 1, p. 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grantham, D.W. and Wightman, F.L., Auditory Motion Aftereffects, Percept. Psychophys., 1979, vol. 26, pp. 403–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grantham, D.W., Auditory Motion Aftereffects in the Horizontal Plane: the Effects of the Spectral Region, Spatial Sector and Spatial Richness, Acta Acustica, 1998, vol. 84, pp. 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dong, C.J., Swindale, N.V., Zakarauskas, P., Hayward, V., and Cynader, M.S., The Auditory Motion Aftereffect: Its Tuning and Specificity in the Spatial and Frequency Domains, Percept. Psychophys., 2000, vol. 62, pp. 1099–1111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elliott, L.L., Backward Masking: Monotic and Dichotic Conditions, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1962, vol. 34, pp. 1108–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Small, A.M., Loudness Perception of Signals of Monotonically Changing Sound Level, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1977, vol. 61, pp. 1293–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reinhardt-Rutland, A.H., Asymmetrical Perception of Changing Intensity in Short Tonal Stimuli: Duration of Stimulus, J. Gen. Psychol., 1996, vol. 123, pp. 115–122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinhardt-Rutland, A.H. and Ehrenstein, W.H., The Growing-Louder Effect in Short Dichotic Stimuli, Percept. Motor Skills, 1996, vol. 83, pp. 63–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reinhardt-Rutland, A.H., Perceptual asymmetries associated with Changing-Loudness Aftereffects, Percept. Psychophys., 2004, vol. 66, pp. 963–969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Neuhoff, J.G., Perceptual Bias for Rising Tones, Nature, 1998, vol. 395, pp. 123–124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neuhoff, J.G., An Adaptive Bias in the Perception of Looming Auditory Motion, Ecol. Psychol. 2001, vol. 13, pp. 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bach, D.R., Neuhoff, J.G., Perrig, W., and Seifritz, E., Looming Sound as Warning Signals: the Function of Motion Cues, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2009, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bach, D.R., Schächinger, H., Neuhoff, J.G., Esposito, F., Di Salle, F., Lehmann, C., Herdener, M., Scheffler, K., and Seifritz, E., Rising Sound Intensity: an Intrinsic Warning Cue Activating the Amygdale, Cereb. Cortex., 2008, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 145–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Von Békésy, G., The Moon Illusion and Similar Auditory Phenomena, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1949, vol. 62, pp. 540–552.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malinina, E.S. and Andreeva, I.G., Auditory Aftereffects of Approaching and Withdrawing Sound Sources: Dependence on the Trajectory and Location of Adapting Stimuli, J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol., 2013, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 316–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stumpf, E., Toronchuk, J.M., and Cynader, M.S., Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex Sensitive to Correlates of Auditory Motion in Three-Dimensional Space, Exp. Brain Res., 1992, vol. 88, pp. 158–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu, T., Liang, L., and Wang, X., Neural Representations of Temporally Asymmetric Stimuli in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Primates, J. Neurophysiol., 2001, vol. 85, pp. 2364–2380.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Middlebrooks, J.C., Individual Differences in External-Ear Transfer Functions Reduced by Scaling in Frequency, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1999a, vol. 106, pp. 1480–1492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Varyagina, O.V. and Radionova, E.A., Functional Asymmetry on Human Assessments of the Movement Trajectories of Fused Sound Images, Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol., 2003, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Radionova, E.A., Neurophysiological Analysis of Some Peculiarities of Human Lateralization of Sound Images in the Absence of Interaural Stimulation Differences, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 2006, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 447–456.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Radionova, E.A., Opyty po fiziologii slukha. Neirofiziologicheskie i psikhofizicheskie issledovaniya (Experiments on Physiology of Hearing. Neurophysiological and Psychophysical Studies). St. Petersburg: Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2003, 256 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia

    E. S. Malinina

Authors
  1. E. S. Malinina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Malinina.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.S. Malinina, 2014, published in Zhurnal Evolyutsionnoi Biokhimii i Fiziologii, 2014, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 59–68.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malinina, E.S. Perception of approaching and withdrawing sound sources after exposure to broadband noise: The importance of spatial domain. J Evol Biochem Phys 50, 66–76 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093014010095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093014010095

Key words

Search

Navigation