Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostics of Nanosystems with the Use of Ultrashort X-Ray Pulses: Theory and Experiment (Brief Review)

  • CONDENSED MATTER
  • Published:
JETP Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

X-ray diffraction analysis is one of the famous widely used methods to study the structure of matter. It is well known that the scattering of ultrashort X-ray pulses can be used in X-ray diffraction analysis. The scattering of such pulses by various multiatomic objects and nanosystems leads to diffraction patterns carrying information not only on the structure of an object but also on the dynamics of processes in this object. Currently, it is technically possible to fabricate intense sources of femto- and attosecond pulses. New theories including the specificity of the interaction of such pulses with matter are not necessarily applied in the X-ray diffraction analysis involving ultrashort pulses. The inclusion of this specificity should lead to a better use of capabilities of sources of ultrashort pulses and to new scientific results. Sources of X-ray ultrashort pulses, widely used methods and new theories of the X-ray diffraction analysis including the specificity of the interaction of such pulses with matter, and modern experiments involving ultrashort pulses are briefly reviewed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. C. Suryanarayana and N. M. Grant, X-Ray Diffraction: A Practical Approach (Plenum, New York, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Jones, Nature (London, U.K.) 505, 602 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. U. Pietsch, V. Holy, and T. Baumbach, High-Resolution X-Ray Scattering (Springer Science, New York, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Benediktovich, I. Feranchuk, and A. Ulyanenkov, Theoretical Concepts of X-Ray Nanoscale Analysis (Springer, Berlin, 2014).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Calegari, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, C. Vozzi, and M. Nisoli, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 062001 (2016).

  7. G. Dixit, O. Vendrell, and R. Santra, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 11636 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Peng, C. Marceau, and D. M. Villeneuve, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 144 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. M. Kraus, M. Zurch, S. K. Cushing, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 82 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders College, New York, 1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. R. W. James, The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-rays (Ox Bow, Woodbridge, CN, 1982).

  12. H. A. Hauptman, Rep. Prog. Phys. 54, 1427 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Schoenlein, T. Elsaesser, K. Holldack, Z. Huang, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, and M. Woerner, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 377, 20180384 (2019).

  14. G. V. Fetisov and G. V. Fetisov, Phys. Usp. 63, 2 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. M. Arkhipov, M. V. Arkhipov, A. A. Shimko, A. V. Pakhomov, and N. N. Rozanov, JETP Lett. 110, 15 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. M. Arkhipov, M. V. Arkhipov, A. V. Pakhomov, M. O. Zhukova, A. N. Tsypkin, and N. N. Rozanov, JETP Lett. 113, 242 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. R. M. Arkhipov, M. V. Arkhipov, I. Babushkin, A. V. Pakhomov, and N. N. Rozanov, Opt. Spectrosc. 128, 529 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. J. Madey, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 1906 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. A. G. Deacon, L. R. Elias, J. M. J. Madey, G. J. Ramian, H. A. Schwettman, and T. I. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 892 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, et al., Nat. Photon. 14, 30 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. K. Maroju, C. Grazioli, M. Di Fraia, et al., Nature (London, U.K.) 578, 386 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Mak, G. Shamuilov, P. Salen, D. Dunning, J. Hebling, Y. Kida, R. Kinjo, B. W. J. McNeil, T. Tanaka, N. Thompson, Z. Tibai, G. Toth, and V. Goryashko, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 025901 (2019).

  23. D. Dunning, B. W. J. Mcneil, and N. R. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 104801 (2013).

  24. N. S. Ginzburg, E. R. Kocharovskaya, A. S. Sergeev, and S. E. Fil’chenkov, JETP Lett. 113, 626 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. V. Ayvazyan, N. Baboi, J. Bahr, et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 37, 297 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. LSLS. https://lcls.slac.stanford.edu/.

  27. T. Ishikawa, H. Aoyagi, T. Asaka, et al., Nat. Photon. 6, 540 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Allaria, L. Badano, S. Bassanese, et al., J. Synchrotr. Radiat. 22, 485 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. I. S. Ko, H.-S. Kang, H. Heo, et al., Appl. Sci. 7, 479 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. J. Milne, T. Schietinger, M. Aiba, et al., Appl. Sci. 7, 720 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Altarelli, The European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Technical Design Report (DESY, Hamburg, Germany, 2006). https://www.xfel.eu/.

  32. J. Weisshaupt, V. Juve, S. Ku, M. Woerner, T. Elsaesser, S. Alisauskas, A. Pugzlys, and A. Baltuska, Nat. Photon. 8, 927 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Braun, K. Schmising, M. Kiel, N. Zhavoronkov, J. Dreyer, M. Bargheer, T. Elsaesser, C. Root, T. E. Schrader, P. Gilch, W. Zinth, and M. Woerner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 248301 (2007).

  34. M. Holtz, C. Hauf, A.-A. H. Salvador, R. Costard, M. Woerner, and T. Elsaesser, Phys. Rev. B 94, 104302 (2016).

  35. F. Zamponi, P. Rothhardt, J. Stingl, M. Woerner, and T. Elsaesser, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 5207 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Wiedemann, Particle Accelerator Physics II: Nonlinear and Higher-Order Beam Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 1999).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Kim, K. H. Kim, K. Y. Oang, J. H. Lee, K. Hong, H. Cho, N. Huse, R. W. Schoenlein, T. K. Kim, and H. Ihee, Chem. Commun. 52, 3734 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. Schick, M. Herzog, A. Bojahr, W. Leitenberger, A. Hertwig, R. Shayduk, and M. Bargheer, Struct. Dyn. 1, 064501 (2014).

  39. S. Wintz, V. Tiberkevich, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, J. Lindner, A. Erbe, A. Slavin, and J. Fassbender, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 948 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. A. A. Zholents and M. S. Zolotorev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 912 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. R. W. Schoenlein, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 287, 2237 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. K. Holldack, J. Bahrdt, A. Balzer, et al., J. Synchrotr. Radiat. 21, 1090 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R. A. Ganeev, Phys. Usp. 56, 772 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. W. Becker, S. Long, and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A 50, 1540 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. B. Li, K. Wang, X. Tang, Y. Chen, C. D. Lin, and C. Jin, New J. Phys. 23, 073051 (2021).

  48. J. Biegert, F. Calegari, N. Dudovich, F. Quere, and M. Vrakking, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 54, 070201 (2021).

  49. A. M. Zheltikov, Phys. Usp. 64, 370 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. J. P. Marangos, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 377 (2145), 20170481 (2019).

  51. K. M. Hoogeboom-Pot, J. N. Hernandez-Charpak, X. Gu, T. D. Frazer, E. H. Anderson, W. Chao, R. W. Falcone, R. Yang, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kap-teyn, and D. Nardi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 4846 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. D. Rupp, N. Monserud, B. Langbehn, et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 493 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. J. T. Moody, A. Tremaine, and P. Musumeci, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 021305 (2016).

  54. J. Duris, P. Musumeci, M. Babzien, et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 4928 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. I. Gadjev, N. Sudar, M. Babzien, et al., Sci. Rep. 9, 532 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ch. Kittel, Quantum Theory of Solids (Wiley, New York, 1963).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. G. Taylor, Acta Crystallogr., D 59, 1881 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. G. Taylor, Acta Crystallogr., D 66, 325 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. A. L. Patterson, Zeitschr. Kristallogr. 90, 517 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  60. D. W. Green, V. M. Ingram, and M. F. Perutz, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 225, 287 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. M. G. Rossmann and D. M. Blow, Acta Crystallogr. 15, 24 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. B.-Ch. Wang, Methods Enzymol. 115, 90 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. B. N. Wardleworth, EMBO J. 21, 4654 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. E. Dodson, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 59, 1958 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. R. Neutze, R. Wouts, D. van der Spoelet, E. Weckert, and J. Hajdu, Nature (London, U.K.) 406, 752 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Z. Jurek, G. Oszlanyi, and G. Faigel, Europhys. Lett. 65, 491 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. H. N. Chapman, P. Fromme, A. Barty, et al., Nature (London, U.K.) 470, 73 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. H. N. Chapman, A. Barty, M. J. Bogan, et al., Nat. Phys. 2, 839 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. EuXFEL. https://www.xfel.eu/.

  70. S. Boutet, L. Lomb, G. J. Williams, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 337, 362 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. L. M. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2: The Classical Theory of Fields (Nauka, Moscow, 1988; Pergamon, Oxford, 1975).

  72. D. N. Makarov Opt. Express 27, 31989 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. V. A. Astapenko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 112, 193 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. V. A. Astapenko and E. V. Sakhno, Appl. Phys. B 126, 23 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. F. B. Rosmej, V. A. Astapenko, V. S. Lisitsa, X. Li, and E. S. Khramov, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 59, 189 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. V. A. Astapenko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 130, 56 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. F. B. Rosmej, V. A. Astapenko, and E. S. Khramov, Matter Radiat. Extremes 6, 034001 (2021).

  78. V. A. Astapenko, F. B. Rosmej, and E. S. Khramov, A-toms 8, 41 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. D. N. Makarov, M. K. Eseev, and K. A. Makarova, Opt. Lett. 44, 3042 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. B. M. Karnakov, V. D. Mur, S. V. Popruzhenko, and V. S. Popov, Phys. Usp. 58, 3 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. F. B. Rosmej, V. A. Astapenko, and V. S. Lisitsa, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50, 235601 (2017).

  82. D. N. Makarov and V. I. Matveev, JETP Lett. 103, 415 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. S. Matsuyama, T. Inoue, J. Yamada, et al., Sci. Rep. 8, 1 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. CoReLS. https://www.ibs.re.kr/eng/sub02_03_05.do.

  85. A. M. Dykhne and G. L. Yudin, Sov. Phys. Usp. 21, 549 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. S. Blanes, F. Casas, J. A. Oteo, and J. Ros, Phys. Rep. 470, 151 (2009).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  87. V. I. Matveev, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 97, 915 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. D. N. Makarov and V. I. Matveev, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 117, 784 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. D. N. Makarov and V. I. Matveev, JETP Lett. 101, 603 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. V. I. Matveev and D. N. Makarov, JETP Lett. 103, 286 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. D. N. Makarov and V. I. Matveev, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 125, 189 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. D. Dmitrovski, E. A. Solovev, and J. S. Briggs, Phys. Rev. A 72, 043411 (2005).

  93. N. N. Rosanov, Opt. Spectrosc. 124, 72 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  94. R. M. Arkhipov, A. V. Pakhomov, M. V. Arkhipov, I. Babushkin, A. Demircan, U. Morgner, and N. N. Rosanov, Opt. Lett. 44, 1202 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 4: Quantum Electrodynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1989; Pergamon, Oxford, 1982).

  96. A. M. Zheltikov, Phys. Usp. 60, 1087 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. M. Pardy, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42, 99 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. C. H. R. Ooi, W. L. Ho, and A. D. Bandrauk, Sci. Rep. 7, 6739 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. D. N. Makarov and V. I. Matveev, JETP Lett. 103, 756 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. N. E. Henriksen and K. B. Moller, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 558 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. M. K. Eseev, A. A. Goshev, and D. N. Makarov, Nanomaterials 10, 1355 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. M. K. Eseev, A. A. Goshev, K. A. Makarova, and D. N. Makarov, Sci. Rep. 11, 3571 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. F. Salvat, J. D. Martnez, R. Mayol, and J. Parellada, Phys. Rev. A 36, 467 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  105. D. N. Makarov, V. I. Matveev, and K. A. Makarova, Russ. Phys. J. 61, 19 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. S. R. Leone, C. W. McCurdy, J. Burgdorfer, et al., Nat. Photon. 8, 162 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. K. Bennett, M. Kowalewski, J. R. Rouxel, and S. Mukamel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 6538 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. K. B. Moller and N. E. Henriksen, Struct. Bond. 142, 185 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. S. Tanaka, V. Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. A 63, 63405 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  110. F. Morales, M. Richter, S. Patchkovskii, and O. Smirnova, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 16906 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  111. G. Dixit, J. M. Slowik, and R. Santra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 137403 (2013).

  112. D. N. Makarov and V. I. Matveev, JETP Lett. 99, 258 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  113. S. Pandey, R. Bean, T. Sato, et al., Nat. Methods 17, 73 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. E. Mizohata, T. Nakane, Y. Fukuda, E. Nango, and S. Iwata, Biophys. Rev. 10, 209 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. C. Sanchez-Cano, R. A. Alvarez-Puebla, J. M. Abendroth, et al., ACS Nano 15, 3754 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. M. Minitti, J. Budarz, A. Kirrander, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 255501 (2015).

  117. E. T. Karamatskos, S. Raabe, T. Mullins, A. Trabattoni, P. Stammer, G. Goldsztejn, R. R. Johansen, K. Dlugolecki, H. Stapelfeldt, M. J. J. Vrakking, S. Trippel, A. Rouzee, and J. Kupper, Nat. Commun. 10, 3364 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  118. Y. Jiang, L. C. Liu, and A. Sarracini, Nat. Commun. 11, 1530 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  119. Z.-H. Loh, G. Doumy, C. Arnold, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 367, 179 (2020).

  120. B. Langbehn, K. Sander, Ye. Ovcharenko, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 255301 (2018).

  121. I. Barke, H. Hartmann, D. Rupp, L. Fluckiger, M. Sa-uppe, M. Adolph, S. Schorb, C. Bostedt, R. Treusch, C. Peltz, S. Bartling, T. Fennel, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, and T. Möller, Nat. Commun. 6, 6187 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  122. A. Madsen, J. Hallmann, G. Ansaldi, et al., J. Synchrotr. Radiat. 28, 637 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. R. Gort, K. Buhlmann, G. Saerens, S. Daster, A. Vaterlaus, and Y. Acremann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 112404 (2020).

  124. G. Mills, R. Bean, and A. P. Mancuso, Appl. Sci. 10, 3642 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. K. Pande, C. D. M. Hutchison, G. Groenhof, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 352, 725 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  126. T. R. M. Barends, L. Foucar, A. Ardevol, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 350, 445 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  127. M. Schmidt, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1401 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. J. Tenboer, S. Basu, N. Zatsepin, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 346, 1242 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  129. H. Liu and W. Lee, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 3421 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. T. W. Kim, S. J. Lee, J. Jo, J. G. Kim, H. Ki, C. W. Kim, K. H. Cho, J. Choi, J. H. Lee, M. Wulff, Y. M. Rhee, and H. Ihee, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 14996 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. C. Gisriel, J. Coe, R. Letrun, et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 5021 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  132. J. N. Clark, L. Beitra, G. Xiong, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 341, 56 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  133. J. Miao, T. Ishikawa, I. K. Robinson, andM. M. Murnane, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 348, 530 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. M. I. McMahon, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/abef26

  135. E. E. McBride, A. Krygier, A. Ehnes, et al., Nat. Phys. 15, 89 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Zs. Jenei, H.-P. Liermann, R. Husband, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 065114 (2019).

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 20-12-50310), by the Council of the President of the Russian Federation for State Support of Young Scientists and Leading Scientific Schools (project no. MD-4260.2021.1.2), and by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (state assignment no. 0793-2020-0005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern (Arctic) Federal University, 163002, Arkhangelsk, Russia

    M. K. Eseev, V. I. Matveev & D. N. Makarov

Authors
  1. M. K. Eseev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. I. Matveev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. N. Makarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. N. Makarov.

Additional information

Translated by R. Tyapaev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eseev, M.K., Matveev, V.I. & Makarov, D.N. Diagnostics of Nanosystems with the Use of Ultrashort X-Ray Pulses: Theory and Experiment (Brief Review). Jetp Lett. 114, 387–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364021190061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364021190061

Search

Navigation