Skip to main content
Log in

Running mass m s at low scale from the heavy-light meson decay constants

  • Fields, Particles, and Nuclei
  • Published:
JETP Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that a 25(20)% difference between the decay constants \(f_{D_s } \) (\(f_{B_s} \)) and f D (f B ) occurs due to large differences in the pole masses of the s and d(u) quarks. The values η D = \(f_{D_s } \)/f D ∼ 1.23(15), recently observed in the CLEO experiment, and η B = \(f_{B_s } \)/f B ∼ 1.20, obtained in unquenched lattice QCD, can be reached only if, in the relativistic Hamiltonian the running mass, m s at low scale is m s (∼0.5 GeV) = 170–200 MeV. Our results follow from the analytical expression for the pseudoscalar decay constant f P based on the path-integral representation of the meson Green’s function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rep. 429, 243 (2006), and references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005); P. Colangelo, E. De Fazio, and R. Ferrandes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2083 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. A. Simonov and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114013 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. DiPierro and E. Eichten, Phys. Rev. D 64, 114004 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. M. Badalian, B. L. G. Bakker, and Yu. A. Simonov, Phys. Rev. D 75, 116001 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. Badalian, A. I. Veselov, and B. L. G. Bakker, Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 1367 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. M. Badalian and B. L. G. Bakker, Phys. Rev. D 66, 034025 (2002); A. M. Badalian, B. L. G. Bakker, and Yu. A. Simonov, Phys. Rev. D 66, 034026 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. G. Chetyrkin and A. Khodjamiran, Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 721 (2006); S. Narison, Phys. Rev. D 74, 034013 (2006); Phys. Lett. B 605, 319 (2005); E. Gamiz, M. Jamin, A. Pich, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 011803 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Gockler et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 054508 (2006), and references therein.

  12. M. Artuso et al. (CLEO Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 251801 (2005); hep-ex/0508057; G. Bonvicini et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 112004 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Artuso et al. (CLEO Collab.), arXiv:0704.0629; T. K. Pedlar et al. (CLEO Collab.), arXiv:0704.0437.

  14. K. Ikado et al. (BELLE Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 251802 (2006); hep-ex/0604018.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collab.), hep-ex/0607094, hepex/0608019; L. A. Corwin (BaBar Collab.), hepex/0611019.

  16. G. Albiendi et al. (OPAL Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 516, 236 (2001); A. Heister et al. (ALEPH Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 528, 1 (2002); hep-ex/0201024; M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 610, 183 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. G. Wang, W. M. Yang, and S. L. Wan, Nucl. Phys. A 744, 156 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Cvetič, C. S. Kim, G.-L. Wang, and W. Namgung, Phys. Lett. B 596, 84 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Lett. B 635, 93 (2006); Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 803 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Narison, hep-ph/0202200; Phys. Lett. B 520, 115 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Aubin, C. Bernard, C. De Tar, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 122002 (2005); hep-lat/0506030; C. Aubin et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 114501 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Gray, M. Wingate, C. T. H. Davies, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 212001 (2005); hep-lat/0507015; M. Wingate, C. T. H. Davies, A. Gray, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 162001 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Yu. Dubin, A. B. Kaidalov, and Yu. A. Simonov, Yad. Fiz. 56(12), 213 (1993) [Phys. At. Nucl. 56, 1745 (1993)]; hep-ph/9311344; Phys. Lett. B 323, 41 (1994); E. L. Gubankova and A. Yu. Dubin, Phys. Lett. B 334, 180 (1994); Yu. A. Simonov, hep-ph/9911237.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu. S. Kalashnikova, A. V. Nefediev, and Yu. A. Simonov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 014037 (2001).

  25. Yu. A. Simonov and J. A. Tjon, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 300, 54 (2002), and references therein.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Y. Yndurain, The Theory of Quark and Gluon Interactions, 4th ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2006), p. 81.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Badalian.

Additional information

The text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badalian, A.M., Bakker, B.L.G. Running mass m s at low scale from the heavy-light meson decay constants. Jetp Lett. 86, 634–636 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364007220043

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364007220043

PACS numbers

Navigation