Abstract—
We have carried out a comparative study of the catalytic activity of nanostructured M–Ru (M = Pt, Pd, Rh) bimetallic catalysts supported on detonation nanodiamond (DND) for methanol steam reforming (MSR) and ethanol steam reforming (ESR) processes in a conventional and a membrane reactor. The catalysts have been characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and BET measurements. In the ESR process, the highest hydrogen yield is ensured by the Pt–Ru/DND catalyst, whereas the Ru–Rh/DND catalyst exhibits the highest activity for the MSR reaction. Our results demonstrate that, if the processes in question are run in a membrane reactor with a Pd–Ru membrane, there is a stable hydrogen flow, free of CO and other impurities, in the permeate zone even at temperatures on the order of 400°C.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Stenina, I.A., Safronova, E.Yu., Levchenko, A.V., Dobrovol’skii, Yu.A., and Yaroslavtsev, A.B., Low-temperature fuel cells: outlook for application in energy storage systems and materials for their development, Therm. Eng., 2016, no. 6, pp. 385–398.
Basile, A., Iulianelli, A., Longo, T., Liguori, S., and Falco, M., Pd-based selective membrane state-of the-art, Membrane Reactors for Hydrogen Production Processes, Marrelli, L. , Eds., New York: Springer, 2011, chapter 2, pp. 21–55.
Basov, N.L., Ermilova, M.M., Orekhova, N.V., and Yaroslavtsev, A.B., Membrane catalysis in dehydrogenation and hydrogen production processes, Usp. Khim., 2013, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 352–368.
Piskin, F. and Öztürk, T., Combinatorial screening of Pd–Ag–Ni membranes for hydrogen separation, J. Membr. Sci., 2017, vol. 524, pp. 631–636.
Barbir, F., PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.
Olah, G.A., Goeppert, A., and Surya Prakash, G.K., Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy, Weinheim: Wiley–VCH, 2009, 2nd ed.
Palo, R.A., Dagle, D.R., and Holladay, J.D., Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production, Chem. Rev., 2007, vol. 107, pp. 3992–4021.
Frusteri, F. and Bonura, G., Hydrogen production by reforming of bio-alcohols, Compendium of Hydrogen Energy. Hydrogen Production and Purification, Subramani, V. et al., Eds., Cambridge: Woodhead, 2015.
Chitsazana, S., Sepehria, S., Garbarinoa, G., Carnascialic, M.M., and Busca, G., Steam reforming of biomass-derived organics: interactions of different mixture components on Ni/Al2O3 based catalysts, Appl. Catal., A, 2016, vol. 187, pp. 386–398.
Tsodikov, M.V., Fedotov, A.S., Antonov, D.O., Uvarov, V.I., Bychkov, V.Yu., and Luck, F.C., Hydrogen and syngas production by dry reforming of fermentation products on porous ceramic membrane-catalytic converters, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, vol. 41, pp. 2424–2431.
Connolly, D., Mathiesen, B.V., and Ridjan, I., A comparison between renewable transport fuels that can supplement or replace biofuels in a 100% renewable energy system, Energy, 2014, vol. 73, pp. 110–125.
Lytkina, A.A., Orekhova, N.V., and Yaroslavtsev, A.B., Catalysts for the steam reforming and electrochemical oxidation of methanol, Inorg. Mater., 2018, vol. 54, no. 13, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168518130034
Sharma, Y.C., Kumar, A., Prasad, R., and Upadhyay, S.N., Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2017, vol. 74, pp. 89–103.
Liu, X., Men, Y., Wang, J., He, R., and Wang, Y., Remarkable support effect on the reactivity of Pt/In2O3/MOx catalysts for methanol steam reforming, J. Power Sources, 2017, vol. 364, pp. 341–350.
Kulakova, I.I., Surface chemistry of nanodiamonds, Phys. Solid State, 2004, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 636–643.
Makarshin, L.L. and Parmon, V.N., Microchannel catalytic systems for hydrogen energy development, Ross. Khim. Zh., 2006, vol. 50, pp. 19–25.
Iulianelli, A., Ribeirinha, P., Mendes, A., and Basile, A., Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen generation via conventional and membrane reactors: a review, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2014, vol. 24, pp. 355–368.
Ievlev, V.M., Dontsov, A.I., Belonogov, E.K., Kannykin, S.V., and Solntsev, K.A., α ⇆ β phase transformations in rolled foil of the Pd–57 at % Cu solid solution, Inorg. Mater., 2017, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1163–1169.
Mironova, E.Yu., Lytkina, A.A., Ermilova, M.M., Efimov, M.N., Zemtsov, L.M., Orekhova, N.V., Karpacheva, G.P., Bondarenko, G.N., Muraviev, D.N., and Yaroslavtsev, A.B., Ethanol and methanol steam reforming on transition metal catalysts supported on detonation synthesis nanodiamonds for hydrogen production, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, vol. 40, pp. 3557–3565.
Sharma, R., Kumar, A., and Upadhyay, R.K., Performance comparison of methanol steam reforming integrated to Pd–Ag membrane: membrane reformer vs. membrane separator, Separation Purificat. Technol., 2017, vol. 183, pp. 194–203.
Espinal, R., Anzola, A., Adrover, E., Roig, M., Chimentao, R., Medina, F., Lopez, E., Borio, D., and Liorca, J., Durable ethanol steam reforming in a catalytic membrane reactor at moderate temperature over cobalt hydrotalcite, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 10 902–10 919.
Barrios, C.E., Bosco, V., Baltanas, M.A., and Bonivardi, A.L., Hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming: catalytic performance of supported-Pd on zinc–cerium oxides nanocomposites, Appl. Catal., B, 2015, vol. 179, pp. 262–275.
Iulianelli, A., Liguori, S., Vita, A., Italiano, C., Fabiano, C., Huang, Y., and Basile, A., The on coming energy vector: hydrogen production in Pd-composite membrane reactor via bioethanol reforming over Ni/CeO2 catalyst, Catal. Today, 2016, vol. 259, pp. 368–375.
Rahimpour, M.R., Samimi, F., Babapoor, A., Tohidian, T., and Mohebi, S., Palladium membrane applications in reaction systems for hydrogen separation and purification: a review, Chem. Eng. Process., 2017, vol. 121, pp. 24–49.
Spallina, V., Matturro, G., Ruocco, C., Meloni, E., Palma, V., Fernandez, E., Melendez, J., Pacheco Tanaka, A.D., Viviente Sole, J.L., and van Sint Annaland, M., Direct route ethanol to pure hydrogen through autothermal reforming in a membrane reactor: experimental demonstration, reactor modeling and design, Energy, 2018, vol. 143, pp. 666–681.
Efimov, M.N., Mironova, E.Yu., Dzidziguri, E.L., and Bondarenko, G.N., Formation of nanoparticles of platinum group metal alloys in composites based on nanodiamonds, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2014, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1739–1744.
Novikova, S.A., Yurkov, G.Yu., and Yaroslavtsev, A.B., Synthesis and transport properties of membrane materials with incorporated metal nanoparticles, Mendeleev Commun., 2010, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 89–91.
Bilal, M. and Jackson, S.D., Ethanol steam reforming over Pt/Al2O3 and Rh/Al2O3 catalysts: the effect of impurities on selectivity and catalyst deactivation, Appl. Catal., A, 2017, no. 529, pp. 98–107.
Bosko, M.L., Ferreira, N., Catena, A., Moreno, M.S., and Cornaglia, L., Catalytic behavior of Ru nanoparticles supported on carbon fibers for the ethanol steam reforming reaction, Catal. Commun., 2018, vol. 114, pp. 19–23.
Bondarenko, G.N., Ermilova, M.M., Efimov, M.N., Zemtsov, L.M., Karpacheva, G.P., Mironova, E.Yu., Orekhova, N.V., Rodionov, A.S., and Yaroslavtsev, A.B., In situ IR-spectroscopy study of ethanol steam reforming in the presence of Pt–Ru/DND nanocatalysts, Nanotechnol. Russ., 2017, vol. 12, nos. 5–6, pp. 315–325.
Gasteiger, H.A., Markovic, N., Ross, P.N., and Cairs, E.J., CO electrooxidation on well-characterized Pt–Ru alloys, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, vol. 98, pp. 617–625.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In our studies, we used equipment at the Novel Petrochemical Processes, Polymer Composites, and Adhesives Shared Research Facilities Center, Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 17-08-00811.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by O. Tsarev
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lytkina, A.A., Mironova, E.Y., Orekhova, N.V. et al. Ru-Containing Catalysts for Methanol and Ethanol Steam Reforming in Conventional and Membrane Reactors. Inorg Mater 55, 547–555 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168519060104
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168519060104