Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of Ionospheric Anomalies in Relation to Earthquakes during High and Low Solar Activity Periods in Years 2002 and 2021

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction between lithosphere and atmosphere allows us to recognize the effects of tectonic activity on the ionosphere layer. This indicates that TEC (Total Electron Content) anomalies in the ionosphere can be a precursor to earthquakes. Within the scope of this study, ionosphere changes in pre- and post- earthquake time series of two earthquakes with magnitudes of 7.9 Mw at solar maximum times which is in solar cycle 23, 2002 and 8.2 Mw at solar minimum times which is in solar cycle 25, 2021 were investigated. TEC changes in ionosphere were calculated using GPS (Global Positioning System) data of IGS (International GNSS Service) stations located within and outside the earthquake preparation area. Anomaly values in TEC changes were computed by applying the moving median method based on the interquartile range to time series. To determine whether the anomalies were caused by space weather conditions, the indices of solar activity (F10.7), geomagnetic storm (Kp), geomagnetic field (B) and disturbance storm time (Dst) were evaluated, and correlation coefficients (ρ) between them and TEC anomalies were calculated. As a result of the study, it was observed that TEC values and anomalies in the earthquake which occurred during the solar maximum time were quite higher than those in the earthquake which took place during the solar minimum time. TEC anomalies which happened independently of space weather conditions prior to earthquakes were accepted as earthquake precursors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

REFERENCES

  1. Adil, M.A., Pulinets, S.A., Şentürk, E., Abbasi, A.R., and Budnikov, P., GNSS atmosphere seismology for equatorial earthquakes: A case study from Central America, GPS Solutions, 2022, vol. 26, p. 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basciftci, F. and Bulbul, S., Investigation of ionospheric TEC changes potentially related to Seferihisar-Izmir earthquake (30 October 2020, Mw 6.6), Bull. Geophys. Oceanogr., 2022, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruevich, E.A., Bruevich, V.V., and Yakunina, G.V., Changed relation between solar 10.7-cm radio flux and some activity indices which describe the radiation at different attitudes of atmosphere during cycles 21–23, J. Astrophys. Astron., 2014, vol. 35, pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dach, R., Lutz, S., Walser, P., and Fridez, P., Eds., Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.72297.

  5. Dobrovolsky, I.P., Zubkov, S.I., and Miachkin, V.I., Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones, Pure Appl. Geophys., 1979, vol. 117, pp. 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Freund, F., Charge generation and propagation in igneous rocks, J. Geodyn., 2002, vol. 33, nos. 4–5, pp. 543–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. https://cddis.nasa.gov/index.html. Accessed May 1, 2022.

  8. https://spdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html. Accessed May 1, 2022.

  9. Jin, R., Jin, S., and Feng, G., M_DCB: Matlab code for estimation GNSS satellite and receiver differential code biases, GPS Solutions, 2012, vol. 16, pp. 541–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leonard, R.S. and Barnes, R.A., Jr., Observation of ionospheric disturbances following the Alaska earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 1965, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1250–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Z., Gao, Y., and Skone, S., A study of smoothed TEC precision inferred from GPS measurements, Earth Planets Space, 2005, vol. 57, pp. 999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J.Y., Chen, Y.I., Chuo, Y.J., and Chen, C.S., A statistical investigation of preearthquake ionospheric anomaly, J. Geophys. Res., 2006, vol. 111, A05304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, J.Y., Chen, Y.I., Chen, C.H., Liu, C.Y., Chen, C.Y., Nishihashi, M., Li, J.Z., Xia, Y.Q., Oyama, K.I., Hattori, K., and Lin, C.H., Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed before the 12 May 2008 M w 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 2009, vol. 114, pp. 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Özsöz, İ. and Pamukçu Ankaya, O., Detection and interpretation of precursory magnetic signals preceding October 30, 2020 Samos earthquake, Turk. J. Earth. Sci., 2021, vol. 30, pp. 748–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pulinets, S.A. and Ouzounov, D., Lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling (LAIC) model, An unified concept for earthquake precursors validation, J. Asian Earth Sci., 2010, vol. 41, pp. 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pulinets, S.A., Legen’ka, A.D., and Alekseev, V.A., Pre-earthquakes effects and their possible mechanisms, in Dusty and Dirty Plasmas, Noise, and Chaos in Space and in the Laboratory, Kikuchi, H., Ed., New York: Springer, 1994, pp. 545–557.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pulinets, S.A., Ouzounov, D.P., Karelin, A.V., and Davidenko, D.V., Physical bases of the generation of short-term earthquake precursors: A complex model of ionization-induced geophysical processes in the lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere–magnetosphere system, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2015, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 540–558.

  18. Pulinets, S., Ouzounov, D., Karelin, A., and Davidenko, D., Lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere–magnetosphere coupling: A concept for pre-earthquake signals generation, in Pre-Earthquake Processes: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Earthquake Prediction Studies, John Wiley and Sons, 2018, pp. 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schnepf, N.R., Minami, T., Toh, H., and Nair, M.C., Magnetic signatures of the 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2022, vol. 49, e2022GL098454.

  20. Ulukavak, M. and Inyurt, S., Detection of possible ionospheric precursor caused by Papua New Guinea earthquake (Mw 7.5), Environ. Monit. Assess., 2020, vol. 192, no. 3, p. 190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie, T., Chen, B., Wu, L., Dai, W., Kuang, C., and Miao, Z., Detecting seismo-ionospheric anomalies possibly associated with the 2019 Ridgecrest (California) earthquakes by GNSS, CSES, and Swarm observations, J. Geophys. Res.: Space, 2021, vol. 126, no. 9, e2020JA028761.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research grew out of a master’s thesis titled “Detection of Ionospheric Anomalies with GNSS and Investigation as an Earthquake Precursor” completed at Konya Technical University’s Department of Geomatics Engineering.

GPS data for the study were obtained from the NASA/CDDIS (National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Crustal Dynamics Data Information System) website, and data on space climate conditions were obtained from the NASA/GSFC OMNIWEB service website. The authors are grateful to these institutions for sharing their scientific data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey

    İrem Köz &  Serkan Doğanalp

Authors
  1. İrem Köz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Serkan Doğanalp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to İrem Köz or Serkan Doğanalp.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

İrem Köz, Serkan Doğanalp Investigation of Ionospheric Anomalies in Relation to Earthquakes during High and Low Solar Activity Periods in Years 2002 and 2021. Geomagn. Aeron. 63, 93–104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222600552

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222600552

Search

Navigation