Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of TEC and Range Error using Low-latitude GPS Data during January to April 2022 Solar Flare Events

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of solar, geomagnetic, and ionospheric anomalies on satellite communication are inextricable. Range Error (RE) is the most common fault that is faced by the navigational receivers during solar flares. Since RE always depends on the Total Electron Content (TEC) available across the satellite ray path, a prediction model capable of predicting the TEC in advance will be an excellent deterrent during adverse space weather conditions. In this research, Cokriging based Surrogate Model (COKSM) is constructed for predicting the TEC variations that occurred during the month of January 2022 to April 2022 over Hyderabad region. The input data used in the construction of the model includes F10.7 radio flux, Sunspot number (SSN), Geomagnetic index Kp and Ap along with Vertical TEC (VTEC) data collected from Hyderabad station located in 17.31° N latitude and 78.55° E longitude. The data is collected in hourly averaged resolution for a period of 120 days covering January to April 2022. The variations in Ionospheric TEC due to solar flares and geomagnetic anomalies that occurred during the selected observation dates are principally analyzed in order to evaluate the prediction capability of the COKSM program during adverse conditions. The performance of the model is evaluated using metrics like Root Mean Square Percentage error (RMSPE), Correlation Coefficient (ρ), CHI-Squared goodness of fit test and R-squared. The results that are plotted as a linear regression scatter plot clearly shows that with very small residuals the proposed prediction model is performing well for TEC prediction. The overall RE predicted by the model is within the scale of 1–12 meters. The error parameters calculated between true TEC and predicted TEC is found out to be in the scale of 0.88 to 5.06% for RMSPE, 0.9308 to 0.9981 for correlation coefficient, 4.97 to 107.94 (TECU) for chi squared and 0.78 to 0.98 (TECU) for R squared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

REFERENCES

  1. Dabbakuti, J.R.K.K., Peesapati, R., Panda, S.K., and Thummala, S., Modeling and analysis of ionospheric TEC variability from GPS–TEC measurements using SSA model during 24th solar cycle, Acta Astronaut., 2021, vol. 178, pp. 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Devireddy, K., Narsetty, S., Ramavath, A.K., and Perumalla, N.K., Validation of the IRI-2016 model with Indian NavIC data for future navigation applications, IET Radar, Sonar Navig., 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1049/rsn2.12013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heki, K. and Fujimoto, T., Atmospheric modes excited by the 2021 August eruption of the Fukutoku-Okanoba volcano, Izu–Bonin Arc, observed as harmonic TEC oscillations by QZSS, Earth Planets Space, 2022, vol. 74, p. 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01587-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jamjareegulgarn, P., Ansari, K., and Ameer, A., Empirical orthogonal function modelling of total electron content over Nepal and comparison with global ionospheric models, Acta Astronaut., 2020, vol. 177, pp. 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.07.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jimoh, O.E., Yesufu, T.K., and Ariyibi, E.A., Investigation of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms over a low latitude station, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, Acta Geophys., 2016, vol. 64, pp. 772–795. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalaee, M.J., Memarian, M.H., and Nekoie, Z., An investigation of the global TEC behavior from 1999 to 2017 variations and deviations, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2021, vol. 61, pp. 1240–1250. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221080119

  7. Kiruthiga, S., Mythili, S., Mukesh, R. et al., Analysis of TEC values predicted by OKSM amongst low, mid and high latitude GPS stations during X 9.3 solar flare, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2021, vol. 366, p. 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-021-03986-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, J.Y., Lin, C.H., Tsai, H.F., and Liou, Y.A., Ionospheric solar flare effects monitored by the ground-based GPS receivers: Theory and observation, J. Geophys., 2004, vol. 109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009931

  9. Liu, J.Y., Lin, C.Y., Chen, Y.I., et al., The source detection of 28 September 2018 Sulawesi tsunami by using ionospheric GNSS total electron content disturbance. Geosci. Lett., 2020, vol. 7, p. 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00160-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mukesh, R., Karthikeyan, V., Soma, P., et al. Cokriging based statistical approximation model for forecasting ionospheric VTEC during high solar activity and storm days, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2019, vol. 364, p. 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-019-3612-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mukesh, R., Karthikeyan, V., Soma, P., et al., Ordinary kriging- and cokriging-based surrogate model for ionospheric TEC prediction using NavIC/GPS data, Acta Geophys., 2020, vol. 68, pp. 1529–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-020-00473-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Obiegbuna, D.C., Okeke, F.N., Okpala, K.C., et al., Effects of full and partial halo geomagnetic storms on an East African low latitude station, Astrophys. Space Sci., 367, 2022, vol. 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-022-04055-4

  13. Omondi, G.E., Baki, P., and Ndinya, B.O., Total electron content and scintillations over Maseno, Kenya, during high solar activity year, Acta Geophys., 2019, vol. 67, pp. 1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00354-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parmar, S., Dalal, U., and Pathak, K., Analyzing impact of major solar flares on ionospheric TEC with RTISM model using IRNSS receiver, at SVNIT, Surat, India, IET Commun., 2019, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 2946– 2955. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2018.5140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prajapati, M., Rawat, A., and Sharma, S., Characterization of amplitude scintillation and distribution of positioning error for IRNSS/GPS/SBAS receiver, Acta Geophys., 2021, vol. 69, pp. 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-020-00507-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajana, S.S.K., Shrungeshwara, T.S., Vivek, C.G., Panda, S.K., and Jade, S., Evaluation of long-term variability of ionospheric total electron content from IRI-2016 model over the Indian sub-continent with a latitudinal chain of dual-frequency geodetic GPS observations during 2002 to 2019, Adv. Space Res., 2022, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 2111–2125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reddybattula, K.D., Panda, S.K., Sharma, S.K., Singh, A.K., Kurnala, K., Sri Haritha, C., and Wuyyuru, S., Anomaly effects of 6–10 September 2017 solar flares on ionospheric total electron content over Saudi Arabian low latitudes, Acta Astronaut., 2020, vol. 177, pp. 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma, S.K., Singh, A.K., Panda, S.K., and Ansari, K., GPS derived ionospheric TEC variability with different solar indices over Saudi Arab region, Acta Astronaut., 2020, vol. 174, pp. 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shubin, V.N. and Gulyaeva, T.L., Global mapping of total electron content from GNSS observations for updating IRI-Plas model, Adv. Space Res., 2022, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sivavaraprasad, G., Ratnam, D.V., Padmaja, R.S., et al., Detection of ionospheric anomalies during intense space weather over a low-latitude GNSS station, Acta Geod. Geophys., 2017, vol. 52, pp. 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0190-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Şentürk, E. and Çepni, M.S., Ionospheric temporal variations over the region of Turkey: A study based on long-time TEC observations, Acta Geod. Geophys., 2018, vol. 53, pp. 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-018-0233-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsagouri, I., Koutroumbas, K., and Elias, P., A new short-term forecasting model for the total electron content storm time disturbances, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2018, vol. 8, no. A33. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018019

  23. Wan, X., Xiong, C., Gao, S., et al., The night-time ionospheric response and occurrence of equatorial plasma irregularities during geomagnetic storms: A case study, Satell. Navig., 2021, vol. 2, p. 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-021-00055-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yarrakula, M., Prabakaran, N., and Dabbakuti, J.R.K.K., Modeling and prediction of TEC based on multivariate analysis and kernel-based extreme learning machine, Astrophys. Space Sci., 2022, vol. 367, p. 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-022-04062-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kiruthiga.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiruthiga, S., Mythili, S., Vijay, M. et al. Prediction of TEC and Range Error using Low-latitude GPS Data during January to April 2022 Solar Flare Events. Geomagn. Aeron. 63, 17–29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222600515

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222600515

Keywords:

Navigation