Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing the Effects of Geomagnetic Storms on the F2-region Ionosphere in South Pacific Region

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geomagnetic storm effects on the F2-region ionospheric parameters namely, foF2 (critical frequency of the F2-region), and h'F (virtual height of the F-region) in the South Pacific region are studied in this research. The storms were selected based on their intensity measured by the Dst-index. The moderate storms are within −50 nT < Dst < −100 nT, intense storms within −100 nT > Dst > −250 nT and super storms within Dst ≤ −250 nT. Two moderate, two intense and two super geomagnetic storms were selected for this study where, foF2 and h'F data were analysed before the storm, during the storm and after the storm at selected equatorial and low latitude stations in the South Pacific Region. The variations in the foF2 and h'F parameters for the F2-region were mainly due to prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs). The decrease in the foF2 during sudden storm commencement and the main phase onset of the storm was mainly due to PPEFs effect which lasts for few hours and later the DDEFs are main drivers for the negative and positive ionospheric trends in the recovery phase of the storm. The geomagnetic storms used in this study and the ionosonde stations in the South Pacific region were never studied before, hence, this study will be useful for the wider scientific communities and all the organizations or people who use ionosphere for communications, report space weather and satellite applications. The constant monitoring of ionosphere before, during and after the geomagnetic storms will help all the forementioned organizations and communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Astafyeva, E., Zakharenkova, I., and Alken, P., Prompt penetration electric fields and the extreme topside ionospheric response to the June 22–23, 2015 geomagnetic storm as seen by the Swarm constellation, Earth, Planets Space, 2016, vol. 68, p. 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0526-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, Y. and Liu, L., Le, H., Zhang, H., and Zhang, R., Responding trends of ionospheric F2-layer to weaker geomagnetic activities, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2022, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2022005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Danilov, A.D. and Laštovička, J., Effects of geomagnetic storms on the ionosphere and atmosphere, Int. J. Geomagn. Aeron., 2001, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fejer, B.G. and Scherlies, L., Empirical models of storm time equatorial zonal electric fields, J. Geophys. Res., 1997, vol. 102, no. A11, pp. 24 047–24 056.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goel, M.K., Singh, S.S., and Rao, B.C.N., Postsunset rise of F layer height in the equatorial region and its relation to the F layer dynamo polarization fields, J. Geophys. Res., 1990, vol. 95, no. A5, pp. 6237–6246. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA095iA05p06237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez, W.D., Joselyn, J.A., Kamide, Y., Kroehl, H.W., Rostoker, G., Tsurutani, B.T., and Vasyliunas, V.M., What is a geomagnetic storm?, J. Geophys. Res., 1994, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 5771–5792.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Habarulema, J.B., Katamzi, Z.T., Sibanda, P., and Matamba, T.M., Assessing ionospheric response during some strong storms in solar cycle 24 using various data sources, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2017, vol. 122, pp.1064–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  8. INGV Ionospheric Yearbook, Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 2013.

  9. Klimenko, M.V., Klimenko, V.V., Zakharenkova, I.E., Ratovsky, K.G., Korenkova, N.A., Yasyukevich, Y.V., and Cherniak, I.V., Similarity and differences in morphology and mechanisms of the foF2 and TEC disturbances during the geomagnetic storms on 26–30 September 2011, Ann. Geophys., 2017, vol. 35, pp. 923–938.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuai, J., Liu, L., Liu, J., Zhao, B., Chen, Y., Le, H., and Wan, W., The long-duration positive storm effects in the equatorial ionosphere over Jicamarca, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2015, vol. 120, pp. 1311–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, E.A. and Kumar, S., Geomagnetic storm effect on F2-region Ionosphere during 2012 at low- and mid-latitude stations in the Southern Hemisphere, Atmosphere, 2022, vol. 13, p. 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, S. and Kumar, V.V., Ionospheric response to the St. Patrick’s Day space weather events in March 2012, 2013, and 2015 at southern low and middle latitudes, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2019, vol. 124, pp. 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar, S., Chandra, H., and Sharma, S., Geomagnetic storms and their ionospheric effects observed at the equatorial anomaly crest in the Indian Region, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2005, vol. 67, pp. 581–594.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lakshmi, D.R., Veenadhari, B., Dabas, R.S., and Reddy, B.M., Sudden post-midnight decrease in equatorial F-region electron densities associated with severe magnetic storms, Ann. Geophys., 1997, vol. 15, pp. 306–313.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, C.H., Richmond, A.D., Heelis, R.A., Bailey, G.J., Lu, G., Liu, J.Y., and Su, S.-Y., Theoretical study of the low- and midlatitude ionospheric electron density enhancement during the October 2003 superstorm: Relative importance of the neutral wind and the electric field, J. Geophys. Res., 2005, vol. 110, p. A12312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, G. and Shen, H., A severe negative response of the ionosphere to the intense geomagnetic storm on March 17, 2015 observed at mid- and low-latitude stations in the China zone, Adv. Space Res., 2017, vol. 59, pp. 2301–2312.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mikhailov, A.V., Skoblin, M.G., and Forster, M., Daytime F2-layer positive storm effect at middle and lower latitudes, Ann. Geophys., 1995, vol. 13, pp. 532–540.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Negreti, P.M., d, pp., Paula, E.R.d., and Candido, C.M.N., Total electron content responses to HILDCAAs and geomagnetic storms over South America, Ann. Geophys., 2017, vol. 35, pp. 1309–1326. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-1309-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Piggott, W.R. and Rawer, K., U.R.S.I. Handbook of Ionogram Interpretation and Reduction, 1978.

  20. Prölss, G.W., Ionospheric F-region storms, in Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics, Volland, H., Ed., Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC, 1995, vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sahai, Y., Fagundes, P.R., Becker-Guedes, F., Bolzan, M.J.A., Abalde, J.R., Pillat, V.G., and Bittencourt, J.A., Effects of the major geomagnetic storms of October 2003 on the equatorial and low-latitude F region in two longitudinal sectors, J. Geophys. Res., 2005, vol. 110, no. A12.

  22. Scherliess, L. and Fejer, B.G., Storm time dependence of equatorial disturbance dynamo zonal electric fields, J. Geophys. Res., 1997, vol. 102, no. A11, pp. 24037–24046.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharan, A. and Kumar, S., Long-term trends of the F2-region at mid-latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2021, vol. 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105683

  24. Singh, R. and Sripathi, S., Ionospheric response to 22–23 June 2015 storm as investigated using ground-based ionosondes and GPS receivers over India, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2017, vol. 122. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024460

  25. Sobral, J.H.A., Abdu, M.A., Gonzalez, W.D., Tsurutani, B.T., Batista, I.S., and Gonzalez, A.L.C.D., Effects of intense storms and substorms on the equatorial ionosphere/thermosphere system in the American sector from ground-based and satellite data, J. Geophys. Res., 1997, vol. 102, pp. 14305–14314.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sobral, J.H.A., Abdu, M.A., Yamashita, C.S., Gonzalez, W.D., and Gonzalez, A.C.D., Batista, I.S., and Tsurutani, B.T., Responses of the low-latitude ionosphere to very intense geomagnetic storms, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2000, vol. 63, pp. 965–974.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tang, J., Gao, X., Yang, D., Zhong, Z., Huo, X., and Wu, X., Local persistent ionospheric positive responses to the geomagnetic storm in August 2018 using BDS-GEO satellites over low-latitude regions in Eastern Hemisphere, Remote Sens., 2022, vol. 14, p. 2272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsurutani, B.T., Verkhoglyadova, O.P., Mannucci, A.J., Saito, A., Araki, T., Yumoto, K., and Vasyliunas, V.M., Prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and their ionospheric effects during the great magnetic storm of 30–31 October 2003, J. Geophys. Res., 2008, vol. 113, p. A05311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012879

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author is thankful to Professor Sushil Kumar of The University of the South Pacific, Fiji for his guidance and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashneel Sharan.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashneel Sharan Analyzing the Effects of Geomagnetic Storms on the F2-region Ionosphere in South Pacific Region. Geomagn. Aeron. 62, 802–814 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222060147

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793222060147

Keywords:

Navigation