Abstract
There are two empirical relationships between amplitudes and lengths of branches of the 11-year cycles of solar activity. The first one relates the amplitude of the given cycle to the length of its ascending branch (“the Waldmeier rule”, WR), the second one binds it to the full length of the previous cycle from minimum to minimum (“the length-to-next-amplitude rule”, LNAR). We show that the WR and LNAR are independent rules and both requires a physical explanation. We demonstrate that these rules can be used for testing of consistency of sunspot number series. We use the two rules to evaluate the amplitude (136 ± 36) and moment of maximum (2025.7 ± 0.7) of the forthcoming cycle 25.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Cameron, R. and Schüssler, M., Solar cycle prediction using precursors and flux transport models, Astrophys. J., 2007, vol. 659, pp. 801–811.
Charbonneau, P. and Dikpati, M., Stochastic fluctuations in a Babcock–Leighton model of the solar cycle, Astrophys. J., 2000, vol. 543, pp. 1027–1043.
Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M., and Cliver, E.W., Revisiting the sunspot number, Space Sci. Rev., 2014, vol. 186, pp. 35–103. http://www.sidc.be/silso/datafiles.
Dicke, R.H., Is there a chronometer hidden deep in the Sun?, Nature, 1978, vol. 276, pp. 676–680.
Friis-Christensen, E. and Lassen, K., Length of the solar cycle: An indicator of solar activity closely associated with climate, Science, 1991, vol. 254, pp. 698–700.
Gnevyshev, M.N. and Ohl, A.I., On 22-year cycle of the solar activity, Astron. Zh., 1948, vol. 25, pp. 18–20.
Hathaway, D.H., The solar cycle, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 2015, vol. 12, pp. 4–87.
Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., and Reichmann, E.J., The shape of the sunspot cycle, Sol. Phys., 1994, vol. 151, pp. 177–190.
Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., and Reichmann, E.J., A synthesis of solar cycle prediction techniques, J. Geophys. Res., 1999, vol. 104, pp. 22375–22388.
Hoyng, P., Helicity fluctuations in mean field: An explanation for the variability of the solar cycle? Astron. Astrophys., 1993, vol. 272, pp. 321–339.
Nagovitsyn, Yu.A., A nonlinear mathematical model for the solar cyclicity and prospects for reconstructing the solar activity in the past, Astron. Lett., 1997, vol. 23, pp. 742–748.
Petrovay, K., Solar cycle prediction, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 2020, vol. 17, id 2.
Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Schüssler, M., and Fligge, M., Search for a relationship between solar cycle amplitude and length, Astron. Astrophys., 2002, vol. 396, pp. 1029–1035.
Waldmeier, M., Neue Eigenschaften der Sonnenfleckenkurve, Astron. Mitt. Eidgenössischen Sternwarte Zürich, 1935, vol. 14, pp. 105–130.
Funding
The work was partially supported by the grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research no. 19-02-00088 and the State Order.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanov, V.G. Two Links between Parameters of 11-year Cycle of Solar Activity. Geomagn. Aeron. 61, 1029–1034 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221070069
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221070069